年轻女性对在常规初级保健期间接受遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险筛查的看法。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2024.01.004
Mady Head MS, LCGC , Betty Cohn MBE , Karen J. Wernli PhD, MS , Lorella Palazzo PhD , Kelly Ehrlich MS , Abigail Matson BA , Sarah Knerr PhD, MPH
{"title":"年轻女性对在常规初级保健期间接受遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险筛查的看法。","authors":"Mady Head MS, LCGC ,&nbsp;Betty Cohn MBE ,&nbsp;Karen J. Wernli PhD, MS ,&nbsp;Lorella Palazzo PhD ,&nbsp;Kelly Ehrlich MS ,&nbsp;Abigail Matson BA ,&nbsp;Sarah Knerr PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening women to identify individuals eligible for genetic counseling based on <em>a priori</em> hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) risk (i.e., risk assessment). However, risk assessment has not been widely integrated into primary care. This qualitative study explored young women's views on implementing routine HBOC risk assessment with a focus on equity and patient-centeredness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted group discussions with young women (aged 21–40 years) receiving care in an integrated health care system. Discussion groups occurred in two phases and used a modified deliberative approach that included a didactic component and prioritized developing consensus. Twenty women participated in one of three initial small group discussions (phase one). All 20 were invited to participate in a subsequent large group discussion (phase two), and 15 of them attended.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Key themes and recommendations were as follows. Risk assessment should be accessible, contextualized, and destigmatized to encourage participation and reduce anxiety, particularly for women who do not know their family history. Providers conducting risk assessments must be equipped to address women's informational needs, relieve emotionality, and plan next steps after positive screens. Finally, to minimize differential screening uptake, health care systems must prioritize equity in program design and contribute to external educational and outreach efforts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Young women see pragmatic opportunities for health systems to optimize HBOC screening implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young Women's Perspectives on Being Screened for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk During Routine Primary Care\",\"authors\":\"Mady Head MS, LCGC ,&nbsp;Betty Cohn MBE ,&nbsp;Karen J. Wernli PhD, MS ,&nbsp;Lorella Palazzo PhD ,&nbsp;Kelly Ehrlich MS ,&nbsp;Abigail Matson BA ,&nbsp;Sarah Knerr PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2024.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening women to identify individuals eligible for genetic counseling based on <em>a priori</em> hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) risk (i.e., risk assessment). However, risk assessment has not been widely integrated into primary care. This qualitative study explored young women's views on implementing routine HBOC risk assessment with a focus on equity and patient-centeredness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted group discussions with young women (aged 21–40 years) receiving care in an integrated health care system. Discussion groups occurred in two phases and used a modified deliberative approach that included a didactic component and prioritized developing consensus. Twenty women participated in one of three initial small group discussions (phase one). All 20 were invited to participate in a subsequent large group discussion (phase two), and 15 of them attended.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Key themes and recommendations were as follows. Risk assessment should be accessible, contextualized, and destigmatized to encourage participation and reduce anxiety, particularly for women who do not know their family history. Providers conducting risk assessments must be equipped to address women's informational needs, relieve emotionality, and plan next steps after positive screens. Finally, to minimize differential screening uptake, health care systems must prioritize equity in program design and contribute to external educational and outreach efforts.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Young women see pragmatic opportunities for health systems to optimize HBOC screening implementation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724000045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724000045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国预防服务工作组建议对妇女进行筛查,根据先验遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)风险(即风险评估)确定符合遗传咨询条件的个体。然而,风险评估尚未广泛纳入初级保健。本定性研究探讨了年轻女性对实施常规 HBOC 风险评估的看法,重点关注公平性和以患者为中心:我们与在综合医疗系统接受治疗的年轻女性(21-40 岁)进行了小组讨论。讨论小组分两个阶段进行,采用了一种经过修改的审议方法,其中包括说教部分,并优先考虑达成共识。20 名妇女参加了最初三个小组讨论中的一个(第一阶段)。所有 20 人都被邀请参加随后的大组讨论(第二阶段),其中 15 人参加了讨论:主要议题和建议如下风险评估应便于参与、符合实际情况并消除耻辱感,以鼓励参与并减少焦虑,尤其是对不了解其家族史的妇女而言。进行风险评估的医疗服务提供者必须具备满足妇女信息需求、缓解情绪以及在筛查结果呈阳性后计划下一步行动的能力。最后,为了最大限度地减少筛查接受率的差异,医疗保健系统必须在项目设计中优先考虑公平性,并为外部教育和外联工作做出贡献:结论:年轻女性为医疗系统优化 HBOC 筛查的实施提供了切实可行的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Young Women's Perspectives on Being Screened for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk During Routine Primary Care

Purpose

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening women to identify individuals eligible for genetic counseling based on a priori hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) risk (i.e., risk assessment). However, risk assessment has not been widely integrated into primary care. This qualitative study explored young women's views on implementing routine HBOC risk assessment with a focus on equity and patient-centeredness.

Methods

We conducted group discussions with young women (aged 21–40 years) receiving care in an integrated health care system. Discussion groups occurred in two phases and used a modified deliberative approach that included a didactic component and prioritized developing consensus. Twenty women participated in one of three initial small group discussions (phase one). All 20 were invited to participate in a subsequent large group discussion (phase two), and 15 of them attended.

Findings

Key themes and recommendations were as follows. Risk assessment should be accessible, contextualized, and destigmatized to encourage participation and reduce anxiety, particularly for women who do not know their family history. Providers conducting risk assessments must be equipped to address women's informational needs, relieve emotionality, and plan next steps after positive screens. Finally, to minimize differential screening uptake, health care systems must prioritize equity in program design and contribute to external educational and outreach efforts.

Conclusion

Young women see pragmatic opportunities for health systems to optimize HBOC screening implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America. Women's Health Care Delivery and Coordination After Transitioning From One Electronic Health Record to Another: Perspectives From Staff in the Veterans Health Administration. Protective Factors Associated With Lower Likelihood of Injection Drug Use and Experiencing Overdose Among Incarcerated Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1