在一项针对无家可归的重症精神病患者的住房技能培训试点项目中测试一揽子实施方案。

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2024-03-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895241236679
Sonya Gabrielian, Alison B Hamilton, Lillian Gelberg, Ella R Koosis, Lauren Hoffmann, David M Carlson, Alexander S Young
{"title":"在一项针对无家可归的重症精神病患者的住房技能培训试点项目中测试一揽子实施方案。","authors":"Sonya Gabrielian, Alison B Hamilton, Lillian Gelberg, Ella R Koosis, Lauren Hoffmann, David M Carlson, Alexander S Young","doi":"10.1177/26334895241236679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based practices (EBPs) improve housing and health for persons who have experienced homelessness with serious mental illness (PEH-SMI) but are challenging to implement. We tested a strategy to support pilot implementation of a 12-session housing skills training intervention for PEH-SMI, tailored from effective social skills training interventions. We aimed to optimize the implementation strategy and intervention prior to an implementation trial.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We provided training and technical assistance to nine providers to support pilot implementation of this intervention to six groups of PEH-SMI (<i>n</i> = 35) engaged in VA Greater Los Angeles' homeless services. We used scales and semi-structured interviews with 14 PEH-SMI and all interventionists to inform implementation strategy adaptations, identify factors that impacted implementation, and assess perceptions of the intervention. Attendance was tracked and we observed a random sample of each interventionist's groups to assess treatment fidelity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventionists perceived the implementation strategy and the intervention favorably. However, interventionists often lacked physical space, staff, and resources (e.g., computers) to conduct the intervention. Interventionists found the content valuable for participants and a few suggested that group engagement should be a prerequisite for obtaining housing services. PEH-SMI were interested in the intervention's content and receptive to the group-based format. Participants attended a mean of 4 ± 3/12 groups; all groups observed had acceptable fidelity. Problems with intervention retention were described, suggesting challenges maintaining group participation when participants transitioned between VA homeless services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To support the implementation of an EBP for PEH-SMI in homeless programs, these data suggest the value of training/technical assistance and strategies that enhance program-level buy-in to address resource concerns. Intervention adaptations, e.g., using a drop-in, open group format, in community-based settings that are easily accessible to PEH-SMI, may also increase adoption. This project was registered as \"Improving Housing Outcomes for Homeless Veterans\" Trial registration NCT03646149, registered 8/24/2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"26334895241236679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing an implementation package in a housing skills training pilot for homeless-experienced persons with serious mental illness.\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Gabrielian, Alison B Hamilton, Lillian Gelberg, Ella R Koosis, Lauren Hoffmann, David M Carlson, Alexander S Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26334895241236679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based practices (EBPs) improve housing and health for persons who have experienced homelessness with serious mental illness (PEH-SMI) but are challenging to implement. We tested a strategy to support pilot implementation of a 12-session housing skills training intervention for PEH-SMI, tailored from effective social skills training interventions. We aimed to optimize the implementation strategy and intervention prior to an implementation trial.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We provided training and technical assistance to nine providers to support pilot implementation of this intervention to six groups of PEH-SMI (<i>n</i> = 35) engaged in VA Greater Los Angeles' homeless services. We used scales and semi-structured interviews with 14 PEH-SMI and all interventionists to inform implementation strategy adaptations, identify factors that impacted implementation, and assess perceptions of the intervention. Attendance was tracked and we observed a random sample of each interventionist's groups to assess treatment fidelity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventionists perceived the implementation strategy and the intervention favorably. However, interventionists often lacked physical space, staff, and resources (e.g., computers) to conduct the intervention. Interventionists found the content valuable for participants and a few suggested that group engagement should be a prerequisite for obtaining housing services. PEH-SMI were interested in the intervention's content and receptive to the group-based format. Participants attended a mean of 4 ± 3/12 groups; all groups observed had acceptable fidelity. Problems with intervention retention were described, suggesting challenges maintaining group participation when participants transitioned between VA homeless services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To support the implementation of an EBP for PEH-SMI in homeless programs, these data suggest the value of training/technical assistance and strategies that enhance program-level buy-in to address resource concerns. Intervention adaptations, e.g., using a drop-in, open group format, in community-based settings that are easily accessible to PEH-SMI, may also increase adoption. This project was registered as \\\"Improving Housing Outcomes for Homeless Veterans\\\" Trial registration NCT03646149, registered 8/24/2018.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"26334895241236679\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916471/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241236679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241236679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:循证实践(EBPs)可以改善患有严重精神疾病的无家可归者(PEH-SMI)的住房和健康状况,但实施起来却很困难。我们测试了一种策略,以支持针对 PEH-SMI 的 12 节住房技能培训干预措施的试点实施,该干预措施是根据有效的社交技能培训干预措施量身定制的。我们的目标是在实施试验之前优化实施策略和干预措施:我们为九家服务提供商提供了培训和技术援助,以支持对参与退伍军人事务部大洛杉矶地区无家可归者服务的六组 PEH-SMI (n = 35)试点实施该干预措施。我们对 14 名 PEH-SMI 和所有干预人员进行了量表和半结构化访谈,以了解实施策略的调整情况,确定影响实施的因素,并评估对干预的看法。我们对干预人员的出勤情况进行了跟踪,并对每个干预人员的小组进行了随机抽样观察,以评估治疗的忠实性:结果:干预者对实施策略和干预措施的看法良好。然而,干预者往往缺乏开展干预的实际空间、人员和资源(如电脑)。干预者认为干预内容对参与者很有价值,有几位干预者建议将参与小组活动作为获得住房服务的先决条件。PEH-SMI 对干预内容很感兴趣,并乐于接受以小组为基础的形式。参与者平均参加了 4 ± 3/12 个小组;观察到的所有小组都具有可接受的忠实性。据介绍,在保持干预效果方面存在问题,这表明当参与者在退伍军人事务部无家可归者服务机构之间转换时,要保持小组参与是有困难的:为了支持在无家可归者计划中实施 PEH-SMI 的 EBP,这些数据表明培训/技术援助和战略的价值,这些战略能增强计划层面的认同,从而解决资源问题。对干预措施进行调整,例如在 PEH-SMI 易于接触到的社区环境中采用随到随学、开放式小组的形式,也可能会提高干预措施的采用率。本项目注册名为 "改善无家可归退伍军人的住房结果",试验注册号为 NCT03646149,注册日期为 2018 年 8 月 24 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing an implementation package in a housing skills training pilot for homeless-experienced persons with serious mental illness.

Background: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) improve housing and health for persons who have experienced homelessness with serious mental illness (PEH-SMI) but are challenging to implement. We tested a strategy to support pilot implementation of a 12-session housing skills training intervention for PEH-SMI, tailored from effective social skills training interventions. We aimed to optimize the implementation strategy and intervention prior to an implementation trial.

Method: We provided training and technical assistance to nine providers to support pilot implementation of this intervention to six groups of PEH-SMI (n = 35) engaged in VA Greater Los Angeles' homeless services. We used scales and semi-structured interviews with 14 PEH-SMI and all interventionists to inform implementation strategy adaptations, identify factors that impacted implementation, and assess perceptions of the intervention. Attendance was tracked and we observed a random sample of each interventionist's groups to assess treatment fidelity.

Results: Interventionists perceived the implementation strategy and the intervention favorably. However, interventionists often lacked physical space, staff, and resources (e.g., computers) to conduct the intervention. Interventionists found the content valuable for participants and a few suggested that group engagement should be a prerequisite for obtaining housing services. PEH-SMI were interested in the intervention's content and receptive to the group-based format. Participants attended a mean of 4 ± 3/12 groups; all groups observed had acceptable fidelity. Problems with intervention retention were described, suggesting challenges maintaining group participation when participants transitioned between VA homeless services.

Conclusions: To support the implementation of an EBP for PEH-SMI in homeless programs, these data suggest the value of training/technical assistance and strategies that enhance program-level buy-in to address resource concerns. Intervention adaptations, e.g., using a drop-in, open group format, in community-based settings that are easily accessible to PEH-SMI, may also increase adoption. This project was registered as "Improving Housing Outcomes for Homeless Veterans" Trial registration NCT03646149, registered 8/24/2018.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a pilot implementation of a digital cognitive behavioral therapy platform for isolated older adults in county mental health services. Calculating power for multilevel implementation trials in mental health: Meaningful effect sizes, intraclass correlation coefficients, and proportions of variance explained by covariates. Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners. Are we being equitable enough? Lessons learned from sites lost in an implementation trial. Examining implementation determinants of a culturally grounded, school-based prevention curriculum in rural Hawai'i: A test development and validation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1