Supplemental Oxygen Concentrations and the Use of Suction to Mitigate Risk of Oral Surgical Fires Using a Laboratory Model.

Purpose: Intraoral oxygen pooling during dental sedation, especially using supplemental oxygen, is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous perioperative fire. The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the effectiveness of intraoral suctioning for reducing oxygen pooling to safe levels during a simulated dental procedure. Methods: Phase one: Twenty trials were completed for each of the three suctioning devices: high-volume evacuation (HVE), fixed tip saliva ejector (SE), and Yankauer suction (YS). Phase two: Twenty trials were completed for each of three suctioning scenarios: no suctioning and continuous suctioning for the HVE and SE. Results: In phase one, the slope for change (decrease) in oxygen during suction was significantly larger for SE than HVE (P<0.001) and YS (P<0.001), but for HVE and YS were not significantly different. Mean oxygen levels during suction were significantly higher for SE than HVE (P<0.001) and YS (P<0.001). In phase two, oxygen increased faster for no suction than for SE and HVE (P<0.001) and increased faster for SE than HVE (P<0.001). Mean oxygen levels were significantly lower for HVE than for SE (P<0.001) and no suction (P<0.001), and significantly lower for SE than no suction (P<0.001). Conclusion: All three devices were effective for reducing intraoral oxygen concentration to acceptable levels during the procedure. The HVE was the most effective suction device for rapidly evacuating pooled intraoral oxygen.