胃肠胰神经内分泌癌的分子特征:与肺神经内分泌癌和消化道腺癌的比较分析。

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Chinese Journal of Cancer Research Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09
Jianwei Zhang, Hanxiao Chen, Junli Zhang, Sha Wang, Yanfang Guan, Wenguang Gu, Jie Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Xicheng Wang, Zhihao Lu, Jun Zhou, Zhi Peng, Yu Sun, Yang Shao, Lin Shen, Minglei Zhuo, Ming Lu
{"title":"胃肠胰神经内分泌癌的分子特征:与肺神经内分泌癌和消化道腺癌的比较分析。","authors":"Jianwei Zhang, Hanxiao Chen, Junli Zhang, Sha Wang, Yanfang Guan, Wenguang Gu, Jie Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Xicheng Wang, Zhihao Lu, Jun Zhou, Zhi Peng, Yu Sun, Yang Shao, Lin Shen, Minglei Zhuo, Ming Lu","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, <i>KRAS</i>, <i>RB1</i>, <i>TERT</i>, <i>IL7R</i>, and <i>CTNNB1</i> were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( <i>TERT</i> amplification), colorectal NEC ( <i>KRAS</i> mutation), and bile tract NEC ( <i>ARID1A</i> mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were <i>KEAP1</i> and <i>CDH1</i>. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested <i>RB1</i>, <i>APC</i>, and <i>KRAS</i> as significant genes. The <i>TP53</i>/ <i>RB1</i> mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months <i>vs.</i> 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9882,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"90-102"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A comparative analysis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma and digestive adenocarcinomas.\",\"authors\":\"Jianwei Zhang, Hanxiao Chen, Junli Zhang, Sha Wang, Yanfang Guan, Wenguang Gu, Jie Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Xicheng Wang, Zhihao Lu, Jun Zhou, Zhi Peng, Yu Sun, Yang Shao, Lin Shen, Minglei Zhuo, Ming Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, <i>KRAS</i>, <i>RB1</i>, <i>TERT</i>, <i>IL7R</i>, and <i>CTNNB1</i> were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( <i>TERT</i> amplification), colorectal NEC ( <i>KRAS</i> mutation), and bile tract NEC ( <i>ARID1A</i> mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were <i>KEAP1</i> and <i>CDH1</i>. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested <i>RB1</i>, <i>APC</i>, and <i>KRAS</i> as significant genes. The <i>TP53</i>/ <i>RB1</i> mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months <i>vs.</i> 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"90-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.01.09","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于胃肠胰腺(GEP)神经内分泌癌(NEC)的治疗是否应遵循小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的指南,一直存在争议。我们的目的是确定 GEPNEC 与其对应癌的遗传差异:我们招募了 GEPNEC 患者作为主要队列,肺部 NEC 和消化道腺癌作为对比队列。所有患者均接受了新一代测序(NGS)。比较分析了GEPNEC与肺NEC(LNEC)、GEPNEC与腺癌之间不同的基因改变,从而得出了显著的基因:我们共招募了 257 例患者,其中包括 99 例 GEPNEC、57 例 LNEC 和 101 例消化道腺癌。在基因突变中,发现 KRAS、RB1、TERT、IL7R 和 CTNNB1 在 GEPNEC 和 LNEC 样本中具有不同的基因改变。每个部位的特定基因也得到了揭示:胃网状细胞癌(TERT扩增)、结直肠网状细胞癌(KRAS突变)和胆道网状细胞癌(ARID1A突变)。小细胞 NEC(SCNEC)和大细胞 NEC(LCNEC)之间的基因差异是 KEAP1 和 CDH1。消化道腺癌也与 GEPNEC 进行了比较,结果表明 RB1、APC 和 KRAS 是重要的基因。TP53/RB1突变模式与一线疗效相关。在22.2%的患者中发现了GEPNEC的可能靶向基因和生物标志物,这些患者在接受靶向治疗后无进展生存期(PFS)更长[12.5个月 vs. 3.0个月,HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75),P=0.006]:这项研究表明,与LNEC和腺癌相比,GEPNEC的基因有显著的差异,而且这些差异在临床上很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Molecular features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A comparative analysis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma and digestive adenocarcinomas.

Objective: There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart.

Methods: We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes.

Results: We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, KRAS, RB1, TERT, IL7R, and CTNNB1 were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( TERT amplification), colorectal NEC ( KRAS mutation), and bile tract NEC ( ARID1A mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were KEAP1 and CDH1. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested RB1, APC, and KRAS as significant genes. The TP53/ RB1 mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months vs. 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006].

Conclusions: This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
1726
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Cancer Research (CJCR; Print ISSN: 1000-9604; Online ISSN:1993-0631) is published by AME Publishing Company in association with Chinese Anti-Cancer Association.It was launched in March 1995 as a quarterly publication and is now published bi-monthly since February 2013. CJCR is published bi-monthly in English, and is an international journal devoted to the life sciences and medical sciences. It publishes peer-reviewed original articles of basic investigations and clinical observations, reviews and brief communications providing a forum for the recent experimental and clinical advances in cancer research. This journal is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), PubMed/PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, SciSearch, Chemistry Abstracts (CA), the Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, Chinainfo, CNKI, CSCI, etc.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence efficiently predicts gastric lesions, Helicobacter pylori infection and lymph node metastasis upon endoscopic images. Deep learning-based automatic pipeline system for predicting lateral cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma using computed tomography: A multi-center study. Effect of visceral obesity on outcomes of fluorescence-guided lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Post hoc analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial. Epidemiology of biliary tract cancer in China: A narrative review. Non-small cell lung cancer organoids: Advances and challenges in current applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1