与澳大利亚不同地区老年人术后谵妄护理相关的围手术期知识、自我效能和临床实践。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Australian Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1111/ajr.13097
Ezinne O. Igwe PhD, Jessica Nealon PhD, Pauline O'Shaughnessy PhD, Callum Ormonde MBBS, Victoria Traynor PhD
{"title":"与澳大利亚不同地区老年人术后谵妄护理相关的围手术期知识、自我效能和临床实践。","authors":"Ezinne O. Igwe PhD,&nbsp;Jessica Nealon PhD,&nbsp;Pauline O'Shaughnessy PhD,&nbsp;Callum Ormonde MBBS,&nbsp;Victoria Traynor PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In older people undergoing surgery, there is a lower tolerance for complications. This highlights the need for documented clinical practices on proper prevention, pre-screening and management of complications such as postoperative delirium (POD). Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines exist for delirium management; however, the management of delirium in clinical settings differs widely.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to develop an understanding of the knowledge, components of self-efficacy (confidence/competence), and clinical practice related to POD care among preoperative and recovery nurses across different types of geographical locations in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A 27-item online survey was sent out to professional associations focused on perioperative care across Australia. The participants included practicing registered nurses specialising in perioperative care. The main outcome measures were Knowledge, confidence/competence and clinical practice relating to POD care in older patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Respondents were categorised into two groups—major cities and rural and remote. Mean age was 46.3 years for respondents in Australian major cities and 49.5 for the comparison group. There was a statistically significant difference between Australian major cities and ‘rural and remote’ in confidence in detecting hyperactive delirium, 25.2% versus 11.7% respectively as well as managing hyperactive delirium, 13.8% versus 1.7%, respectively. Similar results were also observed on hypoactive delirium. Respondents from both groups did not mirror the ideal situation in managing a hyperactive delirium.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Results from this study are inconclusive and there is no clear-cut observation in clinical practice or knowledge between the two geographical categories in this study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The absence of a distinct strategy with POD prevention highlights the need for a uniform approach and consensus on POD prevention and management in older people. This can be achieved by creating more awareness and education through professional development related to POD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative knowledge, self-efficacy and clinical practices related to postoperative delirium care in older people across geographical regions in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Ezinne O. Igwe PhD,&nbsp;Jessica Nealon PhD,&nbsp;Pauline O'Shaughnessy PhD,&nbsp;Callum Ormonde MBBS,&nbsp;Victoria Traynor PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.13097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>In older people undergoing surgery, there is a lower tolerance for complications. This highlights the need for documented clinical practices on proper prevention, pre-screening and management of complications such as postoperative delirium (POD). Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines exist for delirium management; however, the management of delirium in clinical settings differs widely.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to develop an understanding of the knowledge, components of self-efficacy (confidence/competence), and clinical practice related to POD care among preoperative and recovery nurses across different types of geographical locations in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A 27-item online survey was sent out to professional associations focused on perioperative care across Australia. The participants included practicing registered nurses specialising in perioperative care. The main outcome measures were Knowledge, confidence/competence and clinical practice relating to POD care in older patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Respondents were categorised into two groups—major cities and rural and remote. Mean age was 46.3 years for respondents in Australian major cities and 49.5 for the comparison group. There was a statistically significant difference between Australian major cities and ‘rural and remote’ in confidence in detecting hyperactive delirium, 25.2% versus 11.7% respectively as well as managing hyperactive delirium, 13.8% versus 1.7%, respectively. Similar results were also observed on hypoactive delirium. Respondents from both groups did not mirror the ideal situation in managing a hyperactive delirium.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results from this study are inconclusive and there is no clear-cut observation in clinical practice or knowledge between the two geographical categories in this study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The absence of a distinct strategy with POD prevention highlights the need for a uniform approach and consensus on POD prevention and management in older people. This can be achieved by creating more awareness and education through professional development related to POD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13097\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13097\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言接受手术的老年人对并发症的耐受力较低。这凸显了对术后谵妄(POD)等并发症的正确预防、预检和管理的临床实践记录的必要性。目前已有基于证据的谵妄管理临床实践指南,但临床环境中对谵妄的管理却大相径庭:本研究旨在了解澳大利亚不同地理位置的术前和恢复期护士对 POD 护理的相关知识、自我效能(信心/能力)和临床实践:设计:向澳大利亚各地专注于围术期护理的专业协会发送了一份包含 27 个项目的在线调查。参与者包括专门从事围手术期护理的执业注册护士。主要结果指标为老年患者 POD 护理的相关知识、信心/能力和临床实践:受访者分为两组--大城市和农村及偏远地区。澳大利亚大城市受访者的平均年龄为 46.3 岁,对比组为 49.5 岁。澳大利亚大城市与 "农村和偏远地区 "的受访者在发现多动谵妄的信心方面存在显著差异(分别为 25.2% 对 11.7%),在处理多动谵妄的信心方面也存在显著差异(分别为 13.8% 对 1.7%)。在低能谵妄方面也观察到了类似的结果。两组受访者在处理多动谵妄时都没有反映出理想的情况:讨论:本研究的结果尚无定论,在临床实践或知识方面,本研究中的两个地域类别之间没有明显的差异:结论:缺乏预防 POD 的独特策略凸显了在老年人 POD 预防和管理方面采取统一方法和达成共识的必要性。要做到这一点,就必须通过与 POD 相关的专业发展,提高人们对 POD 的认识并加强教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative knowledge, self-efficacy and clinical practices related to postoperative delirium care in older people across geographical regions in Australia

Introduction

In older people undergoing surgery, there is a lower tolerance for complications. This highlights the need for documented clinical practices on proper prevention, pre-screening and management of complications such as postoperative delirium (POD). Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines exist for delirium management; however, the management of delirium in clinical settings differs widely.

Objective

This study aims to develop an understanding of the knowledge, components of self-efficacy (confidence/competence), and clinical practice related to POD care among preoperative and recovery nurses across different types of geographical locations in Australia.

Design

A 27-item online survey was sent out to professional associations focused on perioperative care across Australia. The participants included practicing registered nurses specialising in perioperative care. The main outcome measures were Knowledge, confidence/competence and clinical practice relating to POD care in older patients.

Findings

Respondents were categorised into two groups—major cities and rural and remote. Mean age was 46.3 years for respondents in Australian major cities and 49.5 for the comparison group. There was a statistically significant difference between Australian major cities and ‘rural and remote’ in confidence in detecting hyperactive delirium, 25.2% versus 11.7% respectively as well as managing hyperactive delirium, 13.8% versus 1.7%, respectively. Similar results were also observed on hypoactive delirium. Respondents from both groups did not mirror the ideal situation in managing a hyperactive delirium.

Discussion

Results from this study are inconclusive and there is no clear-cut observation in clinical practice or knowledge between the two geographical categories in this study.

Conclusion

The absence of a distinct strategy with POD prevention highlights the need for a uniform approach and consensus on POD prevention and management in older people. This can be achieved by creating more awareness and education through professional development related to POD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
How First Nations peoples living in the Torres Strait and Northern Peninsula Area describe and discuss social and emotional well-being. Growing the peer workforce in rural mental health and social and emotional well-being services: A scoping review of the literature. Understanding the professional factors that impact the retention of pathology workers in regional, rural and remote Australia. Issue Information Evaluation of nurse practitioners' extended scope of practice in a regional hospital emergency department in tropical Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1