多学科团队(PET 代码)对急性无症状肺血栓栓塞症患者预后的影响

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista clinica espanola Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rce.2024.01.004
S. González , M. Najarro , W. Briceño , C. Rodríguez , D. Barrios , R. Morillo , A. Olavarría , A. Lietor , V. Gómez del Olmo , Á. Osorio , Á. Sánchez-Recalde , A. Muriel , D. Jiménez
{"title":"多学科团队(PET 代码)对急性无症状肺血栓栓塞症患者预后的影响","authors":"S. González ,&nbsp;M. Najarro ,&nbsp;W. Briceño ,&nbsp;C. Rodríguez ,&nbsp;D. Barrios ,&nbsp;R. Morillo ,&nbsp;A. Olavarría ,&nbsp;A. Lietor ,&nbsp;V. Gómez del Olmo ,&nbsp;Á. Osorio ,&nbsp;Á. Sánchez-Recalde ,&nbsp;A. Muriel ,&nbsp;D. Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The effect of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) lacks clarity. We therefore aimed at evaluating the effect of a PERT team on short-term mortality among patients with acute PE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute symptomatic PE enrolled in a single-center registry between 2007 and 2022. We used propensity score matching to compare treatment effects for patients with similar predicted probabilities of receiving management by the PERT team. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following the diagnosis of PE. The secondary outcome was 30-day PE-related mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 2,902 eligible patients who had acute symptomatic PE, 223 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7%-8.7%) were managed by the PERT team. Two hundred and seven patients who were treated by the PERT were matched with 207 patients who were not. Matched pairs did not show a statistically significant lower all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63-1.89) or PE-related death (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.47-3.62) for PERT management compared with no PERT management through 30 days after diagnosis of PE.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results suggest that multidisciplinary care of patients with acute symptomatic PE by a PERT team is not associated with a significant reduction in short-term all-cause or PE-related mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efecto de un equipo multidisciplinar (código TEP) en el pronóstico de los pacientes con tromboembolia de pulmón aguda sintomática\",\"authors\":\"S. González ,&nbsp;M. Najarro ,&nbsp;W. Briceño ,&nbsp;C. Rodríguez ,&nbsp;D. Barrios ,&nbsp;R. Morillo ,&nbsp;A. Olavarría ,&nbsp;A. Lietor ,&nbsp;V. Gómez del Olmo ,&nbsp;Á. Osorio ,&nbsp;Á. Sánchez-Recalde ,&nbsp;A. Muriel ,&nbsp;D. Jiménez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rce.2024.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The effect of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) lacks clarity. We therefore aimed at evaluating the effect of a PERT team on short-term mortality among patients with acute PE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute symptomatic PE enrolled in a single-center registry between 2007 and 2022. We used propensity score matching to compare treatment effects for patients with similar predicted probabilities of receiving management by the PERT team. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following the diagnosis of PE. The secondary outcome was 30-day PE-related mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 2,902 eligible patients who had acute symptomatic PE, 223 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7%-8.7%) were managed by the PERT team. Two hundred and seven patients who were treated by the PERT were matched with 207 patients who were not. Matched pairs did not show a statistically significant lower all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63-1.89) or PE-related death (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.47-3.62) for PERT management compared with no PERT management through 30 days after diagnosis of PE.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results suggest that multidisciplinary care of patients with acute symptomatic PE by a PERT team is not associated with a significant reduction in short-term all-cause or PE-related mortality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524000213\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524000213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肺栓塞应对小组(PERT)对急性无症状肺栓塞(PE)患者短期预后的影响尚不明确。因此,我们旨在评估肺栓塞应对小组对急性肺栓塞患者短期死亡率的影响。方法我们回顾性分析了 2007 年至 2022 年间在单中心登记处登记的连续急性症状性肺栓塞患者。我们使用倾向评分匹配法比较了接受 PERT 团队治疗的预测概率相似的患者的治疗效果。主要结果是确诊 PE 后 30 天内的全因死亡率。结果 在 2902 名符合条件的急性症状 PE 患者中,有 223 人(7.7%;95% 置信区间 [CI],6.7%-8.7%)接受了 PERT 团队的治疗。接受 PERT 治疗的 277 名患者与未接受 PERT 治疗的 207 名患者进行了配对。与诊断 PE 后 30 天内未接受 PERT 治疗的患者相比,接受 PERT 治疗的患者全因死亡(几率比 [OR],1.09;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.63-1.89)或 PE 相关死亡(OR,1.30;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.47-3.62)均无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efecto de un equipo multidisciplinar (código TEP) en el pronóstico de los pacientes con tromboembolia de pulmón aguda sintomática

Background

The effect of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) in the short-term prognosis of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) lacks clarity. We therefore aimed at evaluating the effect of a PERT team on short-term mortality among patients with acute PE.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with acute symptomatic PE enrolled in a single-center registry between 2007 and 2022. We used propensity score matching to compare treatment effects for patients with similar predicted probabilities of receiving management by the PERT team. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days following the diagnosis of PE. The secondary outcome was 30-day PE-related mortality.

Results

Of the 2,902 eligible patients who had acute symptomatic PE, 223 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7%-8.7%) were managed by the PERT team. Two hundred and seven patients who were treated by the PERT were matched with 207 patients who were not. Matched pairs did not show a statistically significant lower all-cause (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63-1.89) or PE-related death (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.47-3.62) for PERT management compared with no PERT management through 30 days after diagnosis of PE.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that multidisciplinary care of patients with acute symptomatic PE by a PERT team is not associated with a significant reduction in short-term all-cause or PE-related mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista clinica espanola
Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
73
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.
期刊最新文献
Incidencia de embolia pulmonar relacionada con el embarazo en España 2016-2021: un estudio observacional retrospectivo de base poblacional Retraso diagnóstico y oportunidades perdidas en la detección precoz de la fibrilación auricular: estudio transversal Anemia de la inflamación y metabolismo del hierro en las enfermedades crónicas Resultados de la implementación del proyecto DP-TRANSFERS en Cataluña: un método traslacional para mejorar el cribado y la prevención de la diabetes en atención primaria El receptor soluble para productos finales de glicación avanzada se correlacionó positivamente con la lesión renal con la enfermedad coronaria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1