采取非药物干预措施,减少重症监护室中的人身限制。

G. Via-Clavero , M. Acevedo Nuevo , D. Gil-Castillejos , J.J. Rodríguez Mondéjar , D. Alonso Crespo
{"title":"采取非药物干预措施,减少重症监护室中的人身限制。","authors":"G. Via-Clavero ,&nbsp;M. Acevedo Nuevo ,&nbsp;D. Gil-Castillejos ,&nbsp;J.J. Rodríguez Mondéjar ,&nbsp;D. Alonso Crespo","doi":"10.1016/j.enfie.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Physical restraint use in critical care units is a frequent low-value care practice influenced by numerous factors creating a local culture. The translation of evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice is scarce so, the analysis of interventions to de-adopt this practice is needed. This update aims to describe and identify nonpharmacological interventions that contribute to minimising the use of physical restraints in adult critically ill patients. Interventions are classified into two groups: those that include education alone and those that combine training with one or more components (multicomponent interventions). These components include less restrictive restraint alternatives, use of physical and cognitive stimulation, decision support tools, institutional multidisciplinary committees, and team involvement. The heterogeneity in the design of the programmes and the low quality of the evidence of the interventions do not allow us to establish recommendations on their effectiveness. However, multicomponent interventions including training, physical and cognitive stimulation of the patient and a culture change of professionals and the organisations towards making restraints visible might be the most effective. The implementation of these programmes should underpin on a prior analysis of each local context to design the most effective-tailored combination of interventions to help reduce or eliminate them from clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93991,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria intensiva","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages e8-e16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce physical restraints in critical care units\",\"authors\":\"G. Via-Clavero ,&nbsp;M. Acevedo Nuevo ,&nbsp;D. Gil-Castillejos ,&nbsp;J.J. Rodríguez Mondéjar ,&nbsp;D. Alonso Crespo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfie.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Physical restraint use in critical care units is a frequent low-value care practice influenced by numerous factors creating a local culture. The translation of evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice is scarce so, the analysis of interventions to de-adopt this practice is needed. This update aims to describe and identify nonpharmacological interventions that contribute to minimising the use of physical restraints in adult critically ill patients. Interventions are classified into two groups: those that include education alone and those that combine training with one or more components (multicomponent interventions). These components include less restrictive restraint alternatives, use of physical and cognitive stimulation, decision support tools, institutional multidisciplinary committees, and team involvement. The heterogeneity in the design of the programmes and the low quality of the evidence of the interventions do not allow us to establish recommendations on their effectiveness. However, multicomponent interventions including training, physical and cognitive stimulation of the patient and a culture change of professionals and the organisations towards making restraints visible might be the most effective. The implementation of these programmes should underpin on a prior analysis of each local context to design the most effective-tailored combination of interventions to help reduce or eliminate them from clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria intensiva\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages e8-e16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984024000132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529984024000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在重症监护病房中使用物理约束是一种常见的低价值护理实践,受到许多因素的影响,形成了一种地方文化。将以证据为基础的建议转化为临床实践的案例很少,因此需要对干预措施进行分析,以消除这种做法。本次更新旨在描述和识别有助于尽量减少对成年重症患者使用物理约束的非药物干预措施。干预措施分为两类:仅包括教育的干预措施和将培训与一个或多个组成部分相结合的干预措施(多组成部分干预措施)。这些组成部分包括限制性较小的约束替代方法、使用物理和认知刺激、决策支持工具、机构多学科委员会和团队参与。由于这些方案的设计不尽相同,而且干预措施的证据质量不高,因此我们无法就其有效性提出建议。然而,包括培训、对患者进行身体和认知刺激以及改变专业人员和组织的文化,使限制措施明显可见在内的多成分干预措施可能是最有效的。这些计划的实施应基于对每个地方情况的事先分析,以设计出最有效的干预措施组合,帮助减少或消除临床实践中的束缚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-pharmacological interventions to reduce physical restraints in critical care units

Physical restraint use in critical care units is a frequent low-value care practice influenced by numerous factors creating a local culture. The translation of evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice is scarce so, the analysis of interventions to de-adopt this practice is needed. This update aims to describe and identify nonpharmacological interventions that contribute to minimising the use of physical restraints in adult critically ill patients. Interventions are classified into two groups: those that include education alone and those that combine training with one or more components (multicomponent interventions). These components include less restrictive restraint alternatives, use of physical and cognitive stimulation, decision support tools, institutional multidisciplinary committees, and team involvement. The heterogeneity in the design of the programmes and the low quality of the evidence of the interventions do not allow us to establish recommendations on their effectiveness. However, multicomponent interventions including training, physical and cognitive stimulation of the patient and a culture change of professionals and the organisations towards making restraints visible might be the most effective. The implementation of these programmes should underpin on a prior analysis of each local context to design the most effective-tailored combination of interventions to help reduce or eliminate them from clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electrophisiological monitoring of pain in non-communicative critically ill patients Nurses' role in spiritual care for patients and families in intensive care units: A scoping review Experience of an advanced practice nurse in an intensive care unit Quality of work life and intention to rotate in intensive care nurses. Cross-sectional study Parent experiences of child loss in a paediatric intensive care unit on human connection and compassionate care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1