外包自有品牌产品供应链中的信息和销售模式战略

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT International Transactions in Operational Research Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1111/itor.13448
Fa Wang, Jing Chen, Hui Yang, Fei Sun
{"title":"外包自有品牌产品供应链中的信息和销售模式战略","authors":"Fa Wang,&nbsp;Jing Chen,&nbsp;Hui Yang,&nbsp;Fei Sun","doi":"10.1111/itor.13448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the interplay between the information strategy of an e-commerce platform and the selling mode strategy of a manufacturer within a co-opetitive supply chain, as well as the identification of the optimal supply chain strategy. We develop a supply chain model where a platform outsources production of its private label product to a manufacturer, who also sells its national brand product through the platform. The platform must decide whether to acquire consumer quality preference information at a cost and share it with the manufacturer, while the manufacturer needs to choose between the reselling mode or the agency selling mode for its national brand product. The two driving effects (<i>competition-intensification effect</i> and <i>mode differentiation effect</i>) are identified. Our findings show that the platform will acquire and share information when the acquisition cost is sufficiently low, leading to the “<i>competition-intensification effect</i>.” Additionally, the manufacturer prefers the agency selling mode when cost-quality efficiency is low, and the reselling mode otherwise, driven by the “<i>mode differentiation effect</i>.” In cases where information sharing is absent, the manufacturer is more likely to choose the agency selling mode. Interestingly, when the cost-quality efficiency of the manufacturer's product is moderate and the information acquisition cost is low, the “<i>competition-intensification effect</i>” and the “<i>mode differentiation effect</i>” offset each other, resulting in the expansion of the region where the manufacturer chooses the reselling mode due to the platform's information-sharing strategy. As a result, this enhances a cooperative relationship between the manufacturer and the platform. We also derive the optimal supply chain strategy, providing insights into both the manufacturer's selling mode and the platform's information strategies in online retailing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49176,"journal":{"name":"International Transactions in Operational Research","volume":"31 5","pages":"3280-3317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information and selling mode strategies in a supply chain with an outsourced private label product\",\"authors\":\"Fa Wang,&nbsp;Jing Chen,&nbsp;Hui Yang,&nbsp;Fei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/itor.13448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper examines the interplay between the information strategy of an e-commerce platform and the selling mode strategy of a manufacturer within a co-opetitive supply chain, as well as the identification of the optimal supply chain strategy. We develop a supply chain model where a platform outsources production of its private label product to a manufacturer, who also sells its national brand product through the platform. The platform must decide whether to acquire consumer quality preference information at a cost and share it with the manufacturer, while the manufacturer needs to choose between the reselling mode or the agency selling mode for its national brand product. The two driving effects (<i>competition-intensification effect</i> and <i>mode differentiation effect</i>) are identified. Our findings show that the platform will acquire and share information when the acquisition cost is sufficiently low, leading to the “<i>competition-intensification effect</i>.” Additionally, the manufacturer prefers the agency selling mode when cost-quality efficiency is low, and the reselling mode otherwise, driven by the “<i>mode differentiation effect</i>.” In cases where information sharing is absent, the manufacturer is more likely to choose the agency selling mode. Interestingly, when the cost-quality efficiency of the manufacturer's product is moderate and the information acquisition cost is low, the “<i>competition-intensification effect</i>” and the “<i>mode differentiation effect</i>” offset each other, resulting in the expansion of the region where the manufacturer chooses the reselling mode due to the platform's information-sharing strategy. As a result, this enhances a cooperative relationship between the manufacturer and the platform. We also derive the optimal supply chain strategy, providing insights into both the manufacturer's selling mode and the platform's information strategies in online retailing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Transactions in Operational Research\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"3280-3317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Transactions in Operational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/itor.13448\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Transactions in Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/itor.13448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在合作型供应链中,电子商务平台的信息战略与制造商的销售模式战略之间的相互作用,以及最优供应链战略的确定。我们建立了一个供应链模型,在该模型中,平台将其自有品牌产品的生产外包给制造商,制造商也通过平台销售其国家品牌产品。平台必须决定是否有偿获取消费者的质量偏好信息并与制造商共享,而制造商则需要在其国家品牌产品的转售模式和代理销售模式之间做出选择。我们发现了两种驱动效应(竞争加剧效应和模式分化效应)。我们的研究结果表明,当获取成本足够低时,平台会获取和共享信息,从而产生 "竞争强化效应"。此外,在 "模式分化效应 "的驱动下,当成本-质量效率较低时,制造商倾向于代理销售模式,反之则倾向于转售模式。在缺乏信息共享的情况下,制造商更倾向于选择代理销售模式。有趣的是,当制造商的产品性价比适中、信息获取成本较低时,"竞争加剧效应 "与 "模式分化效应 "相互抵消,导致制造商因平台的信息共享策略而选择转售模式的区域扩大。因此,这增强了制造商与平台之间的合作关系。我们还推导出了最优供应链策略,为网络零售中制造商的销售模式和平台的信息策略提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information and selling mode strategies in a supply chain with an outsourced private label product

This paper examines the interplay between the information strategy of an e-commerce platform and the selling mode strategy of a manufacturer within a co-opetitive supply chain, as well as the identification of the optimal supply chain strategy. We develop a supply chain model where a platform outsources production of its private label product to a manufacturer, who also sells its national brand product through the platform. The platform must decide whether to acquire consumer quality preference information at a cost and share it with the manufacturer, while the manufacturer needs to choose between the reselling mode or the agency selling mode for its national brand product. The two driving effects (competition-intensification effect and mode differentiation effect) are identified. Our findings show that the platform will acquire and share information when the acquisition cost is sufficiently low, leading to the “competition-intensification effect.” Additionally, the manufacturer prefers the agency selling mode when cost-quality efficiency is low, and the reselling mode otherwise, driven by the “mode differentiation effect.” In cases where information sharing is absent, the manufacturer is more likely to choose the agency selling mode. Interestingly, when the cost-quality efficiency of the manufacturer's product is moderate and the information acquisition cost is low, the “competition-intensification effect” and the “mode differentiation effect” offset each other, resulting in the expansion of the region where the manufacturer chooses the reselling mode due to the platform's information-sharing strategy. As a result, this enhances a cooperative relationship between the manufacturer and the platform. We also derive the optimal supply chain strategy, providing insights into both the manufacturer's selling mode and the platform's information strategies in online retailing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Transactions in Operational Research
International Transactions in Operational Research OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Transactions in Operational Research (ITOR) aims to advance the understanding and practice of Operational Research (OR) and Management Science internationally. Its scope includes: International problems, such as those of fisheries management, environmental issues, and global competitiveness International work done by major OR figures Studies of worldwide interest from nations with emerging OR communities National or regional OR work which has the potential for application in other nations Technical developments of international interest Specific organizational examples that can be applied in other countries National and international presentations of transnational interest Broadly relevant professional issues, such as those of ethics and practice Applications relevant to global industries, such as operations management, manufacturing, and logistics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Special Issue on “Managing Supply Chain Resilience in the Digital Economy Era” Special Issue on “Sharing Platforms for Sustainability: Exploring Strategies, Trade-offs, and Applications” Special Issue on “Optimizing Port and Maritime Logistics: Advances for Sustainable and Efficient Operations” Special issue on “Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1