Miguel Faria , Mónica Teixeira , Maria João Pinto , Paulo Sargento
{"title":"针灸对癌症疼痛的疗效:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Miguel Faria , Mónica Teixeira , Maria João Pinto , Paulo Sargento","doi":"10.1016/j.joim.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain associated with cancer is one of the greatest causes of reduced quality of life in patients. Acupuncture is one of the treatments used to address this issue, with the great advantage of having little or no side effects, especially when compared with pharmacological pain-killers.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy of acupuncture for cancer pain.</p></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><p>Six electronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scielo, b-On and Scopus) were searched for relevant articles about pain relief in cancer patients from their beginning until 2022 using MeSH terms such as “acupuncture,” “electroacupuncture,” “ear acupuncture,” “acupuncture analgesia,” ‘‘oncological pain,” and “cancer pain.”</p></div><div><h3>Inclusion criteria</h3><p>Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where acupuncture was compared with no treatment, placebo acupuncture or usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Data extraction and analysis</h3><p>Three independent reviewers participated in data extraction and evaluation of risk of bias, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analog scale, numeric rating scale, or brief pain inventory. Secondary outcomes also assessed were quality of life, functionality, xerostomia, pain interference, and analgesic consumption. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1124 participants were included in the meta-analysis, with the majority of the studies presenting a low or unclear risk of bias. Acupuncture was more effective in reducing pain than no treatment (SMD = –0.90, 95 % CI [–1.68, –0.12]), sham acupuncture (SMD = –1.10, 95 % CI [–1.59, –0.61]) or usual care (SMD = –1.16, 95 % CI [–1.38, –0.93]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that acupuncture may be an effective intervention to reduce pain associated with cancer. Despite some limitations due to the low quality and small sample size of some included studies, as well as the different types and stages of cancer, acupuncture might provide an effective and safe treatment to reduce cancer pain.</p><p>Please cite this article as: Faria M, Teixeira M, Pinto MJ, Sargento P. Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>J Integr Med</em>. 2024; 22(3): 235–244.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 235-244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Faria , Mónica Teixeira , Maria João Pinto , Paulo Sargento\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joim.2024.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain associated with cancer is one of the greatest causes of reduced quality of life in patients. Acupuncture is one of the treatments used to address this issue, with the great advantage of having little or no side effects, especially when compared with pharmacological pain-killers.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy of acupuncture for cancer pain.</p></div><div><h3>Search strategy</h3><p>Six electronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scielo, b-On and Scopus) were searched for relevant articles about pain relief in cancer patients from their beginning until 2022 using MeSH terms such as “acupuncture,” “electroacupuncture,” “ear acupuncture,” “acupuncture analgesia,” ‘‘oncological pain,” and “cancer pain.”</p></div><div><h3>Inclusion criteria</h3><p>Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where acupuncture was compared with no treatment, placebo acupuncture or usual care.</p></div><div><h3>Data extraction and analysis</h3><p>Three independent reviewers participated in data extraction and evaluation of risk of bias, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analog scale, numeric rating scale, or brief pain inventory. Secondary outcomes also assessed were quality of life, functionality, xerostomia, pain interference, and analgesic consumption. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1124 participants were included in the meta-analysis, with the majority of the studies presenting a low or unclear risk of bias. Acupuncture was more effective in reducing pain than no treatment (SMD = –0.90, 95 % CI [–1.68, –0.12]), sham acupuncture (SMD = –1.10, 95 % CI [–1.59, –0.61]) or usual care (SMD = –1.16, 95 % CI [–1.38, –0.93]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that acupuncture may be an effective intervention to reduce pain associated with cancer. Despite some limitations due to the low quality and small sample size of some included studies, as well as the different types and stages of cancer, acupuncture might provide an effective and safe treatment to reduce cancer pain.</p><p>Please cite this article as: Faria M, Teixeira M, Pinto MJ, Sargento P. Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>J Integr Med</em>. 2024; 22(3): 235–244.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 235-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095496424000268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Medicine-Jim","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095496424000268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与癌症相关的疼痛是导致患者生活质量下降的最大原因之一。针灸是解决这一问题的治疗方法之一,其最大的优点是几乎没有副作用,尤其是与药物止痛药相比。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估针灸治疗癌症疼痛疗效的现有证据。荟萃分析纳入了 16 项研究,共有 1124 人参与,其中大部分研究的偏倚风险较低或不明确。与不治疗(SMD = -0.90,95% CI [-1.68,-0.12])、假针灸(SMD =-1.10,95% CI [-1.59,-0.61])或常规护理(SMD =-1.16,95% CI [-1.38,-0.93])相比,针灸能更有效地减轻疼痛。这项研究结果表明,针灸可能是减少癌症相关疼痛的有效干预措施。尽管由于部分纳入研究的质量较低和样本量较小,以及癌症的不同类型和阶段而存在一些局限性,但针灸可能是一种有效且安全的减轻癌症疼痛的治疗方法。
Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Pain associated with cancer is one of the greatest causes of reduced quality of life in patients. Acupuncture is one of the treatments used to address this issue, with the great advantage of having little or no side effects, especially when compared with pharmacological pain-killers.
Objective
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the efficacy of acupuncture for cancer pain.
Search strategy
Six electronic databases (PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scielo, b-On and Scopus) were searched for relevant articles about pain relief in cancer patients from their beginning until 2022 using MeSH terms such as “acupuncture,” “electroacupuncture,” “ear acupuncture,” “acupuncture analgesia,” ‘‘oncological pain,” and “cancer pain.”
Inclusion criteria
Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where acupuncture was compared with no treatment, placebo acupuncture or usual care.
Data extraction and analysis
Three independent reviewers participated in data extraction and evaluation of risk of bias, and a meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analog scale, numeric rating scale, or brief pain inventory. Secondary outcomes also assessed were quality of life, functionality, xerostomia, pain interference, and analgesic consumption. Results were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results
Sixteen RCTs with a total of 1124 participants were included in the meta-analysis, with the majority of the studies presenting a low or unclear risk of bias. Acupuncture was more effective in reducing pain than no treatment (SMD = –0.90, 95 % CI [–1.68, –0.12]), sham acupuncture (SMD = –1.10, 95 % CI [–1.59, –0.61]) or usual care (SMD = –1.16, 95 % CI [–1.38, –0.93]).
Conclusion
The results of this study suggest that acupuncture may be an effective intervention to reduce pain associated with cancer. Despite some limitations due to the low quality and small sample size of some included studies, as well as the different types and stages of cancer, acupuncture might provide an effective and safe treatment to reduce cancer pain.
Please cite this article as: Faria M, Teixeira M, Pinto MJ, Sargento P. Efficacy of acupuncture on cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(3): 235–244.
期刊介绍:
The predecessor of JIM is the Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine (Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao). With this new, English-language publication, we are committed to make JIM an international platform for publishing high-quality papers on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and an open forum in which the different professions and international scholarly communities can exchange views, share research and their clinical experience, discuss CAM education, and confer about issues and problems in our various disciplines and in CAM as a whole in order to promote integrative medicine.
JIM is indexed/abstracted in: MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Embase, Chemical Abstracts (CA), CAB Abstracts, EBSCO, WPRIM, JST China, Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI).
JIM Editorial Office uses ThomsonReuters ScholarOne Manuscripts as submitting and review system (submission link: http://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/jcim-en).
JIM is published bimonthly. Manuscripts submitted to JIM should be written in English. Article types include but are not limited to randomized controlled and pragmatic trials, translational and patient-centered effectiveness outcome studies, case series and reports, clinical trial protocols, preclinical and basic science studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, papers on methodology and CAM history or education, conference proceedings, editorials, commentaries, short communications, book reviews, and letters to the editor.
Our purpose is to publish a prestigious international journal for studies in integrative medicine. To achieve this aim, we seek to publish high-quality papers on any aspects of integrative medicine, such as acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurveda medicine, herbal medicine, homeopathy, nutrition, chiropractic, mind-body medicine, taichi, qigong, meditation, and any other modalities of CAM; our commitment to international scope ensures that research and progress from all regions of the world are widely covered. These ensure that articles published in JIM have the maximum exposure to the international scholarly community.
JIM can help its authors let their papers reach the widest possible range of readers, and let all those who share an interest in their research field be concerned with their study.