利益相关者对基础设施项目延误看法的异质性:孟加拉国的情况

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1108/ecam-04-2023-0330
Md. Mohaimenul Islam Sourav, Mohammed Russedul Islam, Sheikh Mohibur Rahman, Md. Istiak Jahan
{"title":"利益相关者对基础设施项目延误看法的异质性:孟加拉国的情况","authors":"Md. Mohaimenul Islam Sourav, Mohammed Russedul Islam, Sheikh Mohibur Rahman, Md. Istiak Jahan","doi":"10.1108/ecam-04-2023-0330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In Bangladesh (BD), delays in infrastructure are common. Many previous studies have explored the causes of infrastructure delays. However, this study investigated the causes of delays by taking responses from the stakeholders who are responsible for planning, design, funding, approval and implementation. There are few studies that have related infrastructure project delays to heterogeneity in stakeholders’ perceptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A structural equation (SE) model is developed with 350 normally distributed data points to understand the heterogeneity in stakeholders’ perceptions regarding delays in infrastructure projects in BD. Additionally, the relative importance index (RII) approach is used to assess the responses, validating the SE model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study finds that among the three latent variables, “Project itself related delay” has more influence on delays in infrastructure projects. Among the observed variables under the “project itself related delay” latent variable, “DPP approval process” has the most significance. From the heterogeneity analysis, the study found differences in responses among the stakeholders from “the Engineering Department,” “the Planning Office” and “the Construction Firm/Industry.” An important class of stakeholders believes that their stage is not being delayed and that other stages require attention.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The data sample is 350. More data can improve the accuracy of the findings. Most of the respondents are civil engineers (74%) and represent the owner of the project. Sample data from more stakeholders’ will enhance the accuracy of the result.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study addresses the requirements of Bangladeshi project stakeholders and how their interactions cause delays in projects. Furthermore, the opinions of other stakeholders are taken into consideration when determining the specific factors of individual stakeholders that are causing delays. Practically, the distance between stakeholders should be reduced. A project manager can play a role in this regard. Initiatives should be taken on how to complete the project quickly by eliminating the requirements discussed among the stakeholders and bureaucratic complications. Instead of placing blame on one another, stakeholders should take the initiative to figure out how to work together to finish the project on schedule. The Planning Commission’s approval of the Development Project Proposal (DPP) and Revised Development Project Proposal (RDPP) should be obtained as soon as possible by owner stakeholders. In order to avoid frequently changing the DPP, owners should also exercise greater caution when choosing contractors. Contractor stakeholders should use efficient and proper manpower and equipment so that unexpected delays are not created during the execution of work. Since the role of the contractor stakeholder is the most important among the three types of stakeholders, the contractor should raise awareness and urge the owners to get the RDPP approved quickly.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The findings from the study can help mitigate delays in infrastructure projects in BD, taking into account the perceptions of various stakeholders.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":11888,"journal":{"name":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity in stakeholder's perceptions on delays in infrastructure projects: scenario of Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Md. Mohaimenul Islam Sourav, Mohammed Russedul Islam, Sheikh Mohibur Rahman, Md. Istiak Jahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ecam-04-2023-0330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>In Bangladesh (BD), delays in infrastructure are common. Many previous studies have explored the causes of infrastructure delays. However, this study investigated the causes of delays by taking responses from the stakeholders who are responsible for planning, design, funding, approval and implementation. There are few studies that have related infrastructure project delays to heterogeneity in stakeholders’ perceptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A structural equation (SE) model is developed with 350 normally distributed data points to understand the heterogeneity in stakeholders’ perceptions regarding delays in infrastructure projects in BD. Additionally, the relative importance index (RII) approach is used to assess the responses, validating the SE model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The study finds that among the three latent variables, “Project itself related delay” has more influence on delays in infrastructure projects. Among the observed variables under the “project itself related delay” latent variable, “DPP approval process” has the most significance. From the heterogeneity analysis, the study found differences in responses among the stakeholders from “the Engineering Department,” “the Planning Office” and “the Construction Firm/Industry.” An important class of stakeholders believes that their stage is not being delayed and that other stages require attention.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The data sample is 350. More data can improve the accuracy of the findings. Most of the respondents are civil engineers (74%) and represent the owner of the project. Sample data from more stakeholders’ will enhance the accuracy of the result.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This study addresses the requirements of Bangladeshi project stakeholders and how their interactions cause delays in projects. Furthermore, the opinions of other stakeholders are taken into consideration when determining the specific factors of individual stakeholders that are causing delays. Practically, the distance between stakeholders should be reduced. A project manager can play a role in this regard. Initiatives should be taken on how to complete the project quickly by eliminating the requirements discussed among the stakeholders and bureaucratic complications. Instead of placing blame on one another, stakeholders should take the initiative to figure out how to work together to finish the project on schedule. The Planning Commission’s approval of the Development Project Proposal (DPP) and Revised Development Project Proposal (RDPP) should be obtained as soon as possible by owner stakeholders. In order to avoid frequently changing the DPP, owners should also exercise greater caution when choosing contractors. Contractor stakeholders should use efficient and proper manpower and equipment so that unexpected delays are not created during the execution of work. Since the role of the contractor stakeholder is the most important among the three types of stakeholders, the contractor should raise awareness and urge the owners to get the RDPP approved quickly.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The findings from the study can help mitigate delays in infrastructure projects in BD, taking into account the perceptions of various stakeholders.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":11888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-04-2023-0330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-04-2023-0330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在孟加拉国(BD),基础设施的延误很常见。以前的许多研究都探讨过基础设施延误的原因。然而,本研究通过听取负责规划、设计、筹资、审批和实施的利益相关者的意见,对延误的原因进行了调查。设计/方法/途径 利用 350 个正态分布数据点建立了一个结构方程(SE)模型,以了解利益相关者对英国发展部基础设施项目延误的看法的异质性。研究发现,在三个潜在变量中,"项目本身相关延误 "对基础设施项目延误的影响更大。在 "项目本身相关延误 "潜变量下的观察变量中,"DPP 审批流程 "的意义最大。从异质性分析中,研究发现来自 "工程部"、"规划办公室 "和 "建筑公司/行业 "的利益相关者的反应存在差异。一类重要的利益相关者认为,他们所处的阶段没有被延误,其他阶段需要关注。更多的数据可以提高研究结果的准确性。大多数受访者是土木工程师(74%),代表项目业主。本研究探讨了孟加拉国项目利益相关者的要求,以及他们之间的互动如何导致项目延误。此外,在确定个别利益相关者造成延误的具体因素时,也考虑了其他利益相关者的意见。实际上,利益相关者之间的距离应该缩短。项目经理可以在这方面发挥作用。应采取主动行动,消除利益相关者之间讨论的要求和官僚主义的复杂性,从而快速完成项目。利益相关者不应相互指责,而应主动想办法共同合作,如期完成项目。业主利益相关者应尽快获得规划委员会对开发项目建议书(DPP)和修订开发项目建议书(RDPP)的批准。为避免频繁更改发展项目建议书,业主在选择承包商时也应更加谨慎。承包商利益相关者应使用高效、适当的人力和设备,以免在施工过程中出现意外延误。由于承包商利益相关者在三类利益相关者中扮演着最重要的角色,因此承包商应提高认识,敦促业主尽快批准区域发展计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heterogeneity in stakeholder's perceptions on delays in infrastructure projects: scenario of Bangladesh

Purpose

In Bangladesh (BD), delays in infrastructure are common. Many previous studies have explored the causes of infrastructure delays. However, this study investigated the causes of delays by taking responses from the stakeholders who are responsible for planning, design, funding, approval and implementation. There are few studies that have related infrastructure project delays to heterogeneity in stakeholders’ perceptions.

Design/methodology/approach

A structural equation (SE) model is developed with 350 normally distributed data points to understand the heterogeneity in stakeholders’ perceptions regarding delays in infrastructure projects in BD. Additionally, the relative importance index (RII) approach is used to assess the responses, validating the SE model.

Findings

The study finds that among the three latent variables, “Project itself related delay” has more influence on delays in infrastructure projects. Among the observed variables under the “project itself related delay” latent variable, “DPP approval process” has the most significance. From the heterogeneity analysis, the study found differences in responses among the stakeholders from “the Engineering Department,” “the Planning Office” and “the Construction Firm/Industry.” An important class of stakeholders believes that their stage is not being delayed and that other stages require attention.

Research limitations/implications

The data sample is 350. More data can improve the accuracy of the findings. Most of the respondents are civil engineers (74%) and represent the owner of the project. Sample data from more stakeholders’ will enhance the accuracy of the result.

Practical implications

This study addresses the requirements of Bangladeshi project stakeholders and how their interactions cause delays in projects. Furthermore, the opinions of other stakeholders are taken into consideration when determining the specific factors of individual stakeholders that are causing delays. Practically, the distance between stakeholders should be reduced. A project manager can play a role in this regard. Initiatives should be taken on how to complete the project quickly by eliminating the requirements discussed among the stakeholders and bureaucratic complications. Instead of placing blame on one another, stakeholders should take the initiative to figure out how to work together to finish the project on schedule. The Planning Commission’s approval of the Development Project Proposal (DPP) and Revised Development Project Proposal (RDPP) should be obtained as soon as possible by owner stakeholders. In order to avoid frequently changing the DPP, owners should also exercise greater caution when choosing contractors. Contractor stakeholders should use efficient and proper manpower and equipment so that unexpected delays are not created during the execution of work. Since the role of the contractor stakeholder is the most important among the three types of stakeholders, the contractor should raise awareness and urge the owners to get the RDPP approved quickly.

Originality/value

The findings from the study can help mitigate delays in infrastructure projects in BD, taking into account the perceptions of various stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Business, Management and Accounting-General Business,Management and Accounting
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
19.50%
发文量
226
期刊介绍: ECAM publishes original peer-reviewed research papers, case studies, technical notes, book reviews, features, discussions and other contemporary articles that advance research and practice in engineering, construction and architectural management. In particular, ECAM seeks to advance integrated design and construction practices, project lifecycle management, and sustainable construction. The journal’s scope covers all aspects of architectural design, design management, construction/project management, engineering management of major infrastructure projects, and the operation and management of constructed facilities. ECAM also addresses the technological, process, economic/business, environmental/sustainability, political, and social/human developments that influence the construction project delivery process. ECAM strives to establish strong theoretical and empirical debates in the above areas of engineering, architecture, and construction research. Papers should be heavily integrated with the existing and current body of knowledge within the field and develop explicit and novel contributions. Acknowledging the global character of the field, we welcome papers on regional studies but encourage authors to position the work within the broader international context by reviewing and comparing findings from their regional study with studies conducted in other regions or countries whenever possible.
期刊最新文献
Production-oriented approach for optimal mass-customisation of floor panel layouts in cross-laminated timber (CLT) buildings A decision-support system for choosing between traditional and alternative project delivery methods for bundled projects Traversing the complexity of digital construction and beyond through soft skills: experiences of Malaysian architects Blockchain-enhanced computer vision approach for remote safety inspection in construction A novel approach for integrating BIM and green building rating systems in the construction projects design phase
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1