{"title":"Alexander Kling 和 Johannes F. Lehmann 编著的《卡夫卡的时代》(评论)","authors":"Ruth V. Gross","doi":"10.1353/oas.2024.a921909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Kafkas Zeiten</em> ed. by Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ruth V. Gross </li> </ul> Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann, eds., <em>Kafkas Zeiten</em>. Forschungen der Deutschen Kafka-Gesellschaft 7. Edited by Agnes Bidmon und Harald Neumeyer. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2023. 378 pp. <p>The edited volume <em>Kafkas Zeiten</em>, a compilation of the papers presented at the eighth meeting of the Deutsche Kafka-Gesellschaft that took place, partially at the University of Bonn and partially on Zoom, from September 30 to October 2, 2021, joins the vast number of anthologized studies dealing with Kafka’s texts. It includes seventeen papers and ends with reviews of eight books dealing with Kafka that appeared between 2020 and 2022. The subject of the conference, and thus the title of the volume, points in two distinct directions: (1) to the times in which Kafka lived and wrote; and (2) to the way we experience time as an irregular and imprecise concept in many of Kafka’s texts. In other words, the subject of this book conjoins examinations of time in Kafka’s texts with the culture of modernism and its perspectives on time. The powerful new technologies that transformed the way people thought <strong>[End Page 121]</strong> about time and space and created much of the disorientation in modernism and its art forms have been a recurring subject in Kafka studies. This volume foregrounds that theme.</p> <p>Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann, the co-editors, co-authored the first chapter explaining their intention for the volume. Titled “Aus den Fugen,” it reminds us that time in Kafka’s texts is not a reliable measurement but is instead often an impediment to action. Comparing the concepts of space and time as mutually relevant conditions of modernist texts, especially Kafkan texts, the authors present examples to demonstrate how they work together, how accelerated time necessarily brings about a shrinkage in space. They also point out that in Kafka’s world structural elements that we associate with time, like routine or repetition, are often brought to a “standstill” by an important but often ordinary event, like Gregor’s awakening out of “restless” dreams in <em>Die Verwandlung</em>.</p> <p>A volume like this offers commentary on various texts, and readers will most likely not read the book from cover to cover but rather approach the volume by selecting certain essays that might appeal to their own interests in one or several particular works of Kafka. In my own case, I was drawn to the essays on works that I often teach or have written about, such as Anne Fuchs on “Posthumane Figurationen von Beschleunigung: Tempo und Bewegungseuphorie in Kafkas ‘Betrachtung’”; Rolf J. Goebel’s “Zeit und Klang: Kafkas auditive Atmosphären”; Lea Liese’s “Philiströses Zeitempfinden und Raubtier-Kapitalismus: Kafkas Arbeitstiere (‘Ein Bericht für eine Akademie,’ ‘Der Bau’)”; David Fuchs on “Hungerkunst als Zeitkunst: Zur Darstellungsproblematik ästhetischer Performanz in Franz Kafkas ‘Ein Hungerkünstler’”; and Kyung-Ho Cha’s “Die Zeit als medialer Aktant in Franz Kafkas ‘Eine alltägliche Verwirrung.’” Only the last was a disappointment and failed to provide new insights. The author’s lack of research into key investigations of that specific posthumous Kafkan text—among them my own—might have helped him to extend the discourse rather than repeat it.</p> <p>I had just finished reading Rolf Goebel’s contribution, in which, among other Kafkan texts, he discusses “Bericht für eine Akademie,” when I happened to read David Brooks’s column in <em>The New York Times</em> of July 14, 2023, expressing his views on the progress and threat to humankind that artificial intelligence now poses. The idea that a machine has an intelligence that operates “vastly faster and superior to our own” disturbs Brooks. That notion brought me back to Goebel’s essay in which, at one point, he focuses <strong>[End Page 122]</strong> on the moment when Rotpeter, the ape, swigs down, against his better nature, a bottle of schnapps and as a result ultimately can emulate the sounds he has heard for many weeks from the sailors around him, by coming out with a human word: “Hallo!” Goebel reminds us of Kafka’s take on the advent of acoustical media like the telephone...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kafkas Zeiten ed. by Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann (review)\",\"authors\":\"Ruth V. Gross\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/oas.2024.a921909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Kafkas Zeiten</em> ed. by Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ruth V. Gross </li> </ul> Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann, eds., <em>Kafkas Zeiten</em>. Forschungen der Deutschen Kafka-Gesellschaft 7. Edited by Agnes Bidmon und Harald Neumeyer. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2023. 378 pp. <p>The edited volume <em>Kafkas Zeiten</em>, a compilation of the papers presented at the eighth meeting of the Deutsche Kafka-Gesellschaft that took place, partially at the University of Bonn and partially on Zoom, from September 30 to October 2, 2021, joins the vast number of anthologized studies dealing with Kafka’s texts. It includes seventeen papers and ends with reviews of eight books dealing with Kafka that appeared between 2020 and 2022. The subject of the conference, and thus the title of the volume, points in two distinct directions: (1) to the times in which Kafka lived and wrote; and (2) to the way we experience time as an irregular and imprecise concept in many of Kafka’s texts. In other words, the subject of this book conjoins examinations of time in Kafka’s texts with the culture of modernism and its perspectives on time. The powerful new technologies that transformed the way people thought <strong>[End Page 121]</strong> about time and space and created much of the disorientation in modernism and its art forms have been a recurring subject in Kafka studies. This volume foregrounds that theme.</p> <p>Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann, the co-editors, co-authored the first chapter explaining their intention for the volume. Titled “Aus den Fugen,” it reminds us that time in Kafka’s texts is not a reliable measurement but is instead often an impediment to action. Comparing the concepts of space and time as mutually relevant conditions of modernist texts, especially Kafkan texts, the authors present examples to demonstrate how they work together, how accelerated time necessarily brings about a shrinkage in space. They also point out that in Kafka’s world structural elements that we associate with time, like routine or repetition, are often brought to a “standstill” by an important but often ordinary event, like Gregor’s awakening out of “restless” dreams in <em>Die Verwandlung</em>.</p> <p>A volume like this offers commentary on various texts, and readers will most likely not read the book from cover to cover but rather approach the volume by selecting certain essays that might appeal to their own interests in one or several particular works of Kafka. In my own case, I was drawn to the essays on works that I often teach or have written about, such as Anne Fuchs on “Posthumane Figurationen von Beschleunigung: Tempo und Bewegungseuphorie in Kafkas ‘Betrachtung’”; Rolf J. Goebel’s “Zeit und Klang: Kafkas auditive Atmosphären”; Lea Liese’s “Philiströses Zeitempfinden und Raubtier-Kapitalismus: Kafkas Arbeitstiere (‘Ein Bericht für eine Akademie,’ ‘Der Bau’)”; David Fuchs on “Hungerkunst als Zeitkunst: Zur Darstellungsproblematik ästhetischer Performanz in Franz Kafkas ‘Ein Hungerkünstler’”; and Kyung-Ho Cha’s “Die Zeit als medialer Aktant in Franz Kafkas ‘Eine alltägliche Verwirrung.’” Only the last was a disappointment and failed to provide new insights. The author’s lack of research into key investigations of that specific posthumous Kafkan text—among them my own—might have helped him to extend the discourse rather than repeat it.</p> <p>I had just finished reading Rolf Goebel’s contribution, in which, among other Kafkan texts, he discusses “Bericht für eine Akademie,” when I happened to read David Brooks’s column in <em>The New York Times</em> of July 14, 2023, expressing his views on the progress and threat to humankind that artificial intelligence now poses. The idea that a machine has an intelligence that operates “vastly faster and superior to our own” disturbs Brooks. That notion brought me back to Goebel’s essay in which, at one point, he focuses <strong>[End Page 122]</strong> on the moment when Rotpeter, the ape, swigs down, against his better nature, a bottle of schnapps and as a result ultimately can emulate the sounds he has heard for many weeks from the sailors around him, by coming out with a human word: “Hallo!” Goebel reminds us of Kafka’s take on the advent of acoustical media like the telephone...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Austrian Studies\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Austrian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2024.a921909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2024.a921909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 Kafkas Zeiten ed. by Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann Ruth V. Gross Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann, eds.Forschungen der Deutschen Kafka-Gesellschaft 7.Agnes Bidmon 和 Harald Neumeyer 编辑。维尔茨堡:Königshausen & Neumann, 2023。378 pp.2021 年 9 月 30 日至 10 月 2 日,德国卡夫卡协会召开了第八次会议(部分在波恩大学举行,部分在 Zoom 举行),《卡夫卡时代》汇编了会议上提交的论文。会议包括17篇论文,并对2020年至2022年期间出版的8本有关卡夫卡的书籍进行了评论。本次会议的主题,也就是本卷的标题,指向两个不同的方向:(1)卡夫卡生活和写作的时代;(2)在卡夫卡的许多文本中,时间是一个不规则、不精确的概念,我们是如何体验时间的。换句话说,本书的主题是将对卡夫卡文本中时间的研究与现代主义文化及其对时间的看法结合起来。强大的新技术改变了人们对时间和空间的思考方式,并在现代主义及其艺术形式中造成了许多迷失,这一直是卡夫卡研究中反复出现的主题。本卷突出了这一主题。亚历山大-克林(Alexander Kling)和约翰内斯-F-莱曼(Johannes F. Lehmann)是这本书的共同编辑,他们共同撰写了第一章,阐述了编写这本书的意图。该章以 "Aus den Fugen "为题,提醒我们时间在卡夫卡的文本中并不是一种可靠的衡量标准,相反,它往往是行动的障碍。作者通过比较现代主义文本,尤其是卡夫卡文本中相互关联的空间和时间概念,举例说明了它们是如何共同作用的,时间的加速如何必然带来空间的缩小。他们还指出,在卡夫卡的世界里,我们与时间相关联的结构性元素,如例行公事或重复,往往会因为一个重要但往往普通的事件而 "停滞",如《蝶恋花》中格里高尔从 "躁动不安 "的梦境中醒来。这样的一卷书提供了对各种文本的评论,读者很可能不会从头到尾读完这本书,而是会根据自己对卡夫卡某部或某几部作品的兴趣,选择其中的某些文章来阅读。就我自己而言,我被那些关于我经常教授或撰写过的作品的文章所吸引,比如安妮-福克斯(Anne Fuchs)的 "Posthumane Figurationen von Beschleunigung:Tempo und Bewegungseuphorie in Kafkas 'Betrachtung'"; Rolf J. Goebel的 "Zeit und Klang:Kafkas auditive Atmosphären";Lea Liese 的 "Philiströses Zeitempfinden und Raubtier-Kapitalismus:Kafkas Arbeitstiere ('Ein Bericht für eine Akademie,' 'Der Bau')";David Fuchs on "Hungerkunst als Zeitkunst:Zur Darstellungsproblematik ästhetischer Performanz in Franz Kafkas 'Ein Hungerkünstler'";以及 Kyung-Ho Cha 的 "Die Zeit als medialer Aktant in Franz Kafkas 'Eine alltägliche Verwirrung'"。只有最后一篇令人失望,未能提供新的见解。作者缺乏对卡夫卡遗作的重要研究--其中包括我自己的研究--这可能有助于他扩展而非重复论述。我刚刚读完罗尔夫-戈贝尔(Rolf Goebel)撰写的文章,其中除其他卡夫坎文本外,他还讨论了 "Bericht für eine Akademie",这时我碰巧读到了大卫-布鲁克斯(David Brooks)2023 年 7 月 14 日发表在《纽约时报》上的专栏,他在专栏中表达了自己对人工智能的进步和对人类的威胁的看法。机器拥有 "比我们快得多、优越得多 "的智能,这种想法让布鲁克斯感到不安。这种想法让我想起了戈贝尔的文章,其中有一处,他着重[第 122 页完]描写了猿猴罗特彼得违背自己的天性,喝下一瓶烈酒的瞬间,结果最终能够模仿他从周围水手那里听了好几个星期的声音,说出一个人类的单词:"Hallo!"。戈贝尔让我们想起了卡夫卡对电话等声学媒体出现的看法......
Kafkas Zeiten ed. by Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
Kafkas Zeiten ed. by Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann
Ruth V. Gross
Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann, eds., Kafkas Zeiten. Forschungen der Deutschen Kafka-Gesellschaft 7. Edited by Agnes Bidmon und Harald Neumeyer. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2023. 378 pp.
The edited volume Kafkas Zeiten, a compilation of the papers presented at the eighth meeting of the Deutsche Kafka-Gesellschaft that took place, partially at the University of Bonn and partially on Zoom, from September 30 to October 2, 2021, joins the vast number of anthologized studies dealing with Kafka’s texts. It includes seventeen papers and ends with reviews of eight books dealing with Kafka that appeared between 2020 and 2022. The subject of the conference, and thus the title of the volume, points in two distinct directions: (1) to the times in which Kafka lived and wrote; and (2) to the way we experience time as an irregular and imprecise concept in many of Kafka’s texts. In other words, the subject of this book conjoins examinations of time in Kafka’s texts with the culture of modernism and its perspectives on time. The powerful new technologies that transformed the way people thought [End Page 121] about time and space and created much of the disorientation in modernism and its art forms have been a recurring subject in Kafka studies. This volume foregrounds that theme.
Alexander Kling and Johannes F. Lehmann, the co-editors, co-authored the first chapter explaining their intention for the volume. Titled “Aus den Fugen,” it reminds us that time in Kafka’s texts is not a reliable measurement but is instead often an impediment to action. Comparing the concepts of space and time as mutually relevant conditions of modernist texts, especially Kafkan texts, the authors present examples to demonstrate how they work together, how accelerated time necessarily brings about a shrinkage in space. They also point out that in Kafka’s world structural elements that we associate with time, like routine or repetition, are often brought to a “standstill” by an important but often ordinary event, like Gregor’s awakening out of “restless” dreams in Die Verwandlung.
A volume like this offers commentary on various texts, and readers will most likely not read the book from cover to cover but rather approach the volume by selecting certain essays that might appeal to their own interests in one or several particular works of Kafka. In my own case, I was drawn to the essays on works that I often teach or have written about, such as Anne Fuchs on “Posthumane Figurationen von Beschleunigung: Tempo und Bewegungseuphorie in Kafkas ‘Betrachtung’”; Rolf J. Goebel’s “Zeit und Klang: Kafkas auditive Atmosphären”; Lea Liese’s “Philiströses Zeitempfinden und Raubtier-Kapitalismus: Kafkas Arbeitstiere (‘Ein Bericht für eine Akademie,’ ‘Der Bau’)”; David Fuchs on “Hungerkunst als Zeitkunst: Zur Darstellungsproblematik ästhetischer Performanz in Franz Kafkas ‘Ein Hungerkünstler’”; and Kyung-Ho Cha’s “Die Zeit als medialer Aktant in Franz Kafkas ‘Eine alltägliche Verwirrung.’” Only the last was a disappointment and failed to provide new insights. The author’s lack of research into key investigations of that specific posthumous Kafkan text—among them my own—might have helped him to extend the discourse rather than repeat it.
I had just finished reading Rolf Goebel’s contribution, in which, among other Kafkan texts, he discusses “Bericht für eine Akademie,” when I happened to read David Brooks’s column in The New York Times of July 14, 2023, expressing his views on the progress and threat to humankind that artificial intelligence now poses. The idea that a machine has an intelligence that operates “vastly faster and superior to our own” disturbs Brooks. That notion brought me back to Goebel’s essay in which, at one point, he focuses [End Page 122] on the moment when Rotpeter, the ape, swigs down, against his better nature, a bottle of schnapps and as a result ultimately can emulate the sounds he has heard for many weeks from the sailors around him, by coming out with a human word: “Hallo!” Goebel reminds us of Kafka’s take on the advent of acoustical media like the telephone...
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.