经腹膜前腹腔镜单切口手术治疗老年人疝气:一项横断面研究

IF 0.2 Q4 SURGERY Formosan Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1097/fs9.0000000000000120
Thuong Pham Van, Ngoc Son Vu, Minh-Tung Do
{"title":"经腹膜前腹腔镜单切口手术治疗老年人疝气:一项横断面研究","authors":"Thuong Pham Van, Ngoc Son Vu, Minh-Tung Do","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Only a few studies on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for transabdominal preperitoneal (SILS-TAPP) inguinal hernia (IH) repair have been conducted. Thus, we aimed to verify whether SILS-TAPP IH repair in elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) is safe and effective for non-elderly patients (< 65 years old).\n \n \n \n A retrospective study of 91 patients who underwent SILS-TAPP for IH between November 2011 and April 2014 and were followed up until June 2018 was conducted. The inclusion criterion was SILS-TAPP for unilateral inguinal hernia, regardless of primary or recurrent. The main variables of interest were age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, inguinal hernia classification, operation time, perioperative and postoperative complications, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, long-term complications, and recurrence.\n \n \n \n Elderly patients had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher ASA of Anesthesiologists scores than non-elderly patients. Intraoperative characteristics, including IH classification and size of the internal hernia ring, were similar. Operation time did not differ between the two groups (44.1 ± 14.7 minutes in the elderly versus 49.8 ± 19.7 minutes in the nonelderly). The postoperative pain score, short- and long-term complications, and recurrence rates were similar between the groups.\n \n \n \n SILS-TAPP is safe, feasible, and an alternative treatment for IH in the elderly.\n","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-incision laparoscopic surgery transabdominal preperitoneal approach for hernia in elderly: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Thuong Pham Van, Ngoc Son Vu, Minh-Tung Do\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Only a few studies on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for transabdominal preperitoneal (SILS-TAPP) inguinal hernia (IH) repair have been conducted. Thus, we aimed to verify whether SILS-TAPP IH repair in elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) is safe and effective for non-elderly patients (< 65 years old).\\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective study of 91 patients who underwent SILS-TAPP for IH between November 2011 and April 2014 and were followed up until June 2018 was conducted. The inclusion criterion was SILS-TAPP for unilateral inguinal hernia, regardless of primary or recurrent. The main variables of interest were age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, inguinal hernia classification, operation time, perioperative and postoperative complications, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, long-term complications, and recurrence.\\n \\n \\n \\n Elderly patients had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher ASA of Anesthesiologists scores than non-elderly patients. Intraoperative characteristics, including IH classification and size of the internal hernia ring, were similar. Operation time did not differ between the two groups (44.1 ± 14.7 minutes in the elderly versus 49.8 ± 19.7 minutes in the nonelderly). The postoperative pain score, short- and long-term complications, and recurrence rates were similar between the groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n SILS-TAPP is safe, feasible, and an alternative treatment for IH in the elderly.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formosan Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formosan Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于经腹膜前腹股沟疝(IH)修补的单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS-TAPP)的研究为数不多。因此,我们旨在验证老年患者(≥ 65 岁)的 SILS-TAPP IH 修补术对于非老年患者(< 65 岁)是否安全有效。 我们对 2011 年 11 月至 2014 年 4 月间接受 SILS-TAPP 治疗 IH 并随访至 2018 年 6 月的 91 例患者进行了回顾性研究。纳入标准为单侧腹股沟疝的 SILS-TAPP,无论原发性还是复发性。研究的主要变量包括年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、腹股沟疝分类、手术时间、围手术期和术后并发症、术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、长期并发症和复发。 与非老年患者相比,老年患者的合并症发生率更高,麻醉师协会的评分也更高。术中特征(包括IH分类和内疝环大小)相似。两组患者的手术时间没有差异(老年人为 44.1 ± 14.7 分钟,非老年人为 49.8 ± 19.7 分钟)。两组患者的术后疼痛评分、短期和长期并发症以及复发率相似。 SILS-TAPP 安全、可行,是治疗老年人 IH 的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery transabdominal preperitoneal approach for hernia in elderly: a cross-sectional study
Only a few studies on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for transabdominal preperitoneal (SILS-TAPP) inguinal hernia (IH) repair have been conducted. Thus, we aimed to verify whether SILS-TAPP IH repair in elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) is safe and effective for non-elderly patients (< 65 years old). A retrospective study of 91 patients who underwent SILS-TAPP for IH between November 2011 and April 2014 and were followed up until June 2018 was conducted. The inclusion criterion was SILS-TAPP for unilateral inguinal hernia, regardless of primary or recurrent. The main variables of interest were age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, inguinal hernia classification, operation time, perioperative and postoperative complications, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, long-term complications, and recurrence. Elderly patients had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher ASA of Anesthesiologists scores than non-elderly patients. Intraoperative characteristics, including IH classification and size of the internal hernia ring, were similar. Operation time did not differ between the two groups (44.1 ± 14.7 minutes in the elderly versus 49.8 ± 19.7 minutes in the nonelderly). The postoperative pain score, short- and long-term complications, and recurrence rates were similar between the groups. SILS-TAPP is safe, feasible, and an alternative treatment for IH in the elderly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Formosan Journal of Surgery, a publication of Taiwan Surgical Association, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.e-fjs.org. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
Urethral Pseudodiverticulum with Left-Sided Non-Functioning Kidney: Case Report Upholding Ethical Standards in Post-Publication Interactions: A Call to Action Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Dinalbuphine Sebacate for Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Infected Urachal Cyst with Urethral Stricture Disease presenting with intraperitoneal perforation of cyst and pyoperitoneum AI-powered medicine is being repurposed to find novel surgical infection cures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1