打破学术孤岛:在营养两极分化时代开展公平肥胖预防培训和研究的教学建议

Salima F. Taylor MS , Danielle M. Krobath PhD , Adolfo G. Cuevas PhD , Erin Hennessy PhD , Susan B. Roberts PhD
{"title":"打破学术孤岛:在营养两极分化时代开展公平肥胖预防培训和研究的教学建议","authors":"Salima F. Taylor MS ,&nbsp;Danielle M. Krobath PhD ,&nbsp;Adolfo G. Cuevas PhD ,&nbsp;Erin Hennessy PhD ,&nbsp;Susan B. Roberts PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Obesity is a preventable chronic condition and a risk factor for poor health and early mortality. Weight stigma and weight-neutral medicine are popular topics in social media that are often at odds with current medical guidelines on obesity treatment and prevention. This conflict may erode the public’s trust in science, impede research progress on preventing obesity in marginalized groups, and uphold the ongoing and historical lack of diversity among nutrition trainees.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors conducted a series of student-led dialogue sessions with nutrition graduate students in Boston, Massachusetts, from March to May 2023 to understand perceptions of obesity research, health equity, and racism and discrimination. This article summarizes the lessons learned and provides pedagogical recommendations for jointly addressing obesity at the population level and the recruitment, training, and retention of diverse scholars, clinicians, and public health practitioners.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Dialogue sessions revealed that students perceive a disproportionate focus on the harms of obesity as a chronic disease, highlighting that inadequate attention is given to weight stigma and discrimination. Some participants believed that weight-based discrimination is equally detrimental to individual health and wellbeing as having obesity. Discussions also emphasized the need to pinpoint the multidimensional and cultural manifestations of weight stigma, which necessitates collaboration across social sectors and academic disciplines. Students recognized the urgent need to apply an equity lens to obesity research and teaching but felt limited in their access to experts within nutrition science who specialize in racism, discrimination, eating disorders, and weight stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study identified concrete opportunities for urgently needed new training and research in population-level obesity prevention, emphasizing antiracism, harm reduction, and elimination of stigma and bias across multiple levels of science and society. Overall, the decision to use the BMI within pedagogy and training must be explicitly stated—research, population surveillance, decision-making, or treatment pedagogy and training—while acknowledging its strengths and limitations across diverse settings. Finally, the social determinants of obesity should incorporate not only weight stigma but also racism and multiple forms of discrimination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000361/pdfft?md5=dbeb7dace6afc6b54f39c3496d9c8e42&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000361-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking Academic Silos: Pedagogical Recommendations for Equitable Obesity Prevention Training and Research During an Age of Nutrition Polarization\",\"authors\":\"Salima F. Taylor MS ,&nbsp;Danielle M. Krobath PhD ,&nbsp;Adolfo G. Cuevas PhD ,&nbsp;Erin Hennessy PhD ,&nbsp;Susan B. Roberts PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Obesity is a preventable chronic condition and a risk factor for poor health and early mortality. Weight stigma and weight-neutral medicine are popular topics in social media that are often at odds with current medical guidelines on obesity treatment and prevention. This conflict may erode the public’s trust in science, impede research progress on preventing obesity in marginalized groups, and uphold the ongoing and historical lack of diversity among nutrition trainees.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors conducted a series of student-led dialogue sessions with nutrition graduate students in Boston, Massachusetts, from March to May 2023 to understand perceptions of obesity research, health equity, and racism and discrimination. This article summarizes the lessons learned and provides pedagogical recommendations for jointly addressing obesity at the population level and the recruitment, training, and retention of diverse scholars, clinicians, and public health practitioners.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Dialogue sessions revealed that students perceive a disproportionate focus on the harms of obesity as a chronic disease, highlighting that inadequate attention is given to weight stigma and discrimination. Some participants believed that weight-based discrimination is equally detrimental to individual health and wellbeing as having obesity. Discussions also emphasized the need to pinpoint the multidimensional and cultural manifestations of weight stigma, which necessitates collaboration across social sectors and academic disciplines. Students recognized the urgent need to apply an equity lens to obesity research and teaching but felt limited in their access to experts within nutrition science who specialize in racism, discrimination, eating disorders, and weight stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study identified concrete opportunities for urgently needed new training and research in population-level obesity prevention, emphasizing antiracism, harm reduction, and elimination of stigma and bias across multiple levels of science and society. Overall, the decision to use the BMI within pedagogy and training must be explicitly stated—research, population surveillance, decision-making, or treatment pedagogy and training—while acknowledging its strengths and limitations across diverse settings. Finally, the social determinants of obesity should incorporate not only weight stigma but also racism and multiple forms of discrimination.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJPM focus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000361/pdfft?md5=dbeb7dace6afc6b54f39c3496d9c8e42&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000361-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJPM focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 肥胖是一种可预防的慢性疾病,也是导致健康状况不佳和过早死亡的风险因素。体重成见和体重中立医学是社交媒体上的热门话题,但它们往往与当前治疗和预防肥胖症的医学指南相悖。这种冲突可能会削弱公众对科学的信任,阻碍预防边缘化群体肥胖的研究进展,并使营养学受训者中持续存在的、历史性的缺乏多样性的问题继续存在。方法作者于2023年3月至5月在马萨诸塞州波士顿与营养学研究生开展了一系列由学生主导的对话会议,以了解他们对肥胖研究、健康公平以及种族主义和歧视的看法。本文总结了经验教训,并提出了教学建议,以共同解决人口层面的肥胖问题,以及招募、培训和留住多元化的学者、临床医生和公共卫生从业人员。结果 对话会议显示,学生们认为肥胖作为一种慢性疾病的危害受到了过多的关注,并强调对体重羞辱和歧视的关注不够。一些与会者认为,基于体重的歧视与肥胖症对个人的健康和幸福同样有害。讨论还强调,有必要明确体重蔑视的多层面和文化表现形式,这就需要社会各界和各学科的合作。学生们认识到迫切需要将公平视角应用到肥胖研究和教学中,但他们认为在接触营养科学领域中专门研究种族主义、歧视、饮食失调和体重鄙视的专家方面受到了限制。结论这项研究确定了在人群一级预防肥胖方面急需的新培训和研究的具体机会,强调反种族主义、减少伤害以及在科学和社会的多个层面消除鄙视和偏见。总之,在教学和培训中使用体重指数的决定必须明确说明--研究、人口监测、决策或治疗教学和培训--同时承认其在不同环境中的优势和局限性。最后,肥胖症的社会决定因素不仅应包括体重耻辱,还应包括种族主义和多种形式的歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Breaking Academic Silos: Pedagogical Recommendations for Equitable Obesity Prevention Training and Research During an Age of Nutrition Polarization

Introduction

Obesity is a preventable chronic condition and a risk factor for poor health and early mortality. Weight stigma and weight-neutral medicine are popular topics in social media that are often at odds with current medical guidelines on obesity treatment and prevention. This conflict may erode the public’s trust in science, impede research progress on preventing obesity in marginalized groups, and uphold the ongoing and historical lack of diversity among nutrition trainees.

Methods

The authors conducted a series of student-led dialogue sessions with nutrition graduate students in Boston, Massachusetts, from March to May 2023 to understand perceptions of obesity research, health equity, and racism and discrimination. This article summarizes the lessons learned and provides pedagogical recommendations for jointly addressing obesity at the population level and the recruitment, training, and retention of diverse scholars, clinicians, and public health practitioners.

Results

Dialogue sessions revealed that students perceive a disproportionate focus on the harms of obesity as a chronic disease, highlighting that inadequate attention is given to weight stigma and discrimination. Some participants believed that weight-based discrimination is equally detrimental to individual health and wellbeing as having obesity. Discussions also emphasized the need to pinpoint the multidimensional and cultural manifestations of weight stigma, which necessitates collaboration across social sectors and academic disciplines. Students recognized the urgent need to apply an equity lens to obesity research and teaching but felt limited in their access to experts within nutrition science who specialize in racism, discrimination, eating disorders, and weight stigma.

Conclusions

This study identified concrete opportunities for urgently needed new training and research in population-level obesity prevention, emphasizing antiracism, harm reduction, and elimination of stigma and bias across multiple levels of science and society. Overall, the decision to use the BMI within pedagogy and training must be explicitly stated—research, population surveillance, decision-making, or treatment pedagogy and training—while acknowledging its strengths and limitations across diverse settings. Finally, the social determinants of obesity should incorporate not only weight stigma but also racism and multiple forms of discrimination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board and Journal Information Work-Related Factors Associated With Psychological Distress Among Grocery Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lifestyle Differences in the Metabolic Comorbidity Score of Adult Population From South Asian Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study Corrigendum: Associations of Historical Redlining With BMI and Waist Circumference in Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Physicians’ Self-Reported Knowledge and Behaviors Related to Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain and Diagnosing Opioid Use Disorder, DocStyles, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1