科学、技术、工程与数学(STEM)教师教育项目的学科整合特征:系统回顾

Carlos Mauricio Agudelo Rodríguez, Ronald Andrés González-Reyes, Andrés Bernal Ballen, Martha Andrea Merchán Merchán, Ellie Anne López Barrera
{"title":"科学、技术、工程与数学(STEM)教师教育项目的学科整合特征:系统回顾","authors":"Carlos Mauricio Agudelo Rodríguez, Ronald Andrés González-Reyes, Andrés Bernal Ballen, Martha Andrea Merchán Merchán, Ellie Anne López Barrera","doi":"10.29333/ejmste/14280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STEM education is established as an alternative for developing 21st century skills, with the premise of integrating its component disciplines. Although numerous studies exist on the subject, STEM teacher training programs are not widely discussed. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify the intentions of the training and the design and implementation of such teacher training programs. Among the 15 articles identified, there are three groups of intentions: Improving knowledge, developing competencies and skills, and changing attitudes and perceptions. Five methodological strategies were identified: project-based learning, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, ODR (observation/discussion/reflection) approach, and design-based learning. Disciplinary integration can be achieved through content or competencies. It is concluded that design-based learning is the most appropriate strategy for disciplinary integration. It is recommended that research be conducted to measure the impact of modality and time of training on the development of STEM competencies.","PeriodicalId":35438,"journal":{"name":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of STEM teacher education programs for disciplinary integration: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Mauricio Agudelo Rodríguez, Ronald Andrés González-Reyes, Andrés Bernal Ballen, Martha Andrea Merchán Merchán, Ellie Anne López Barrera\",\"doi\":\"10.29333/ejmste/14280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STEM education is established as an alternative for developing 21st century skills, with the premise of integrating its component disciplines. Although numerous studies exist on the subject, STEM teacher training programs are not widely discussed. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify the intentions of the training and the design and implementation of such teacher training programs. Among the 15 articles identified, there are three groups of intentions: Improving knowledge, developing competencies and skills, and changing attitudes and perceptions. Five methodological strategies were identified: project-based learning, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, ODR (observation/discussion/reflection) approach, and design-based learning. Disciplinary integration can be achieved through content or competencies. It is concluded that design-based learning is the most appropriate strategy for disciplinary integration. It is recommended that research be conducted to measure the impact of modality and time of training on the development of STEM competencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

STEM 教育是培养 21 世纪技能的另一种选择,其前提是整合各组成学科。虽然有关这一主题的研究不胜枚举,但对 STEM 教师培训计划的讨论却并不广泛。因此,我们在 Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了系统的文献综述,以确定培训的意图以及此类教师培训计划的设计和实施。在确定的 15 篇文章中,有三组意向:提高知识水平、培养能力和技能、改变态度和观念。确定了五种方法策略:基于项目的学习、基于问题的学习、合作学习、ODR(观察/讨论/反思)方法和基于设计的学习。学科整合可以通过内容或能力来实现。结论是,基于设计的学习是最适合学科整合的策略。建议开展研究,衡量培训方式和时间对培养 STEM 能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterization of STEM teacher education programs for disciplinary integration: A systematic review
STEM education is established as an alternative for developing 21st century skills, with the premise of integrating its component disciplines. Although numerous studies exist on the subject, STEM teacher training programs are not widely discussed. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify the intentions of the training and the design and implementation of such teacher training programs. Among the 15 articles identified, there are three groups of intentions: Improving knowledge, developing competencies and skills, and changing attitudes and perceptions. Five methodological strategies were identified: project-based learning, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, ODR (observation/discussion/reflection) approach, and design-based learning. Disciplinary integration can be achieved through content or competencies. It is concluded that design-based learning is the most appropriate strategy for disciplinary integration. It is recommended that research be conducted to measure the impact of modality and time of training on the development of STEM competencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education is peer-reviewed and published 12 times in a year. The Journal is an Open Access Journal. The Journal strictly adheres to the principles of the peer review process. The EJMSTE Journal publishes original articles in the following areas: -Mathematics Education: Algebra Education, Geometry Education, Math Education, Statistics Education. -Science Education: Astronomy Education, Biology Education, Chemistry Education, Geographical and Environmental Education, Geoscience Education, Physics Education, Sustainability Education. -Engineering Education -STEM Education -Technology Education: Human Computer Interactions, Knowledge Management, Learning Management Systems, Distance Education, E-Learning, Blended Learning, ICT/Moodle in Education, Web 2.0 Tools for Education
期刊最新文献
Unlocking numerical sense: An in-depth analysis of teaching practices among mathematics teachers in primary schools Interest of middle school students toward life and earth sciences Determination of student’s perception during biology online learning at COVID-19 crisis Examining the cognitive structure of elementary school students regarding science, energy sources, and health using the word association method Expanded model for elementary algebraic reasoning levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1