Carlos Mauricio Agudelo Rodríguez, Ronald Andrés González-Reyes, Andrés Bernal Ballen, Martha Andrea Merchán Merchán, Ellie Anne López Barrera
{"title":"科学、技术、工程与数学(STEM)教师教育项目的学科整合特征:系统回顾","authors":"Carlos Mauricio Agudelo Rodríguez, Ronald Andrés González-Reyes, Andrés Bernal Ballen, Martha Andrea Merchán Merchán, Ellie Anne López Barrera","doi":"10.29333/ejmste/14280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STEM education is established as an alternative for developing 21st century skills, with the premise of integrating its component disciplines. Although numerous studies exist on the subject, STEM teacher training programs are not widely discussed. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify the intentions of the training and the design and implementation of such teacher training programs. Among the 15 articles identified, there are three groups of intentions: Improving knowledge, developing competencies and skills, and changing attitudes and perceptions. Five methodological strategies were identified: project-based learning, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, ODR (observation/discussion/reflection) approach, and design-based learning. Disciplinary integration can be achieved through content or competencies. It is concluded that design-based learning is the most appropriate strategy for disciplinary integration. It is recommended that research be conducted to measure the impact of modality and time of training on the development of STEM competencies.","PeriodicalId":35438,"journal":{"name":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":"124 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of STEM teacher education programs for disciplinary integration: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Mauricio Agudelo Rodríguez, Ronald Andrés González-Reyes, Andrés Bernal Ballen, Martha Andrea Merchán Merchán, Ellie Anne López Barrera\",\"doi\":\"10.29333/ejmste/14280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STEM education is established as an alternative for developing 21st century skills, with the premise of integrating its component disciplines. Although numerous studies exist on the subject, STEM teacher training programs are not widely discussed. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify the intentions of the training and the design and implementation of such teacher training programs. Among the 15 articles identified, there are three groups of intentions: Improving knowledge, developing competencies and skills, and changing attitudes and perceptions. Five methodological strategies were identified: project-based learning, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, ODR (observation/discussion/reflection) approach, and design-based learning. Disciplinary integration can be achieved through content or competencies. It is concluded that design-based learning is the most appropriate strategy for disciplinary integration. It is recommended that research be conducted to measure the impact of modality and time of training on the development of STEM competencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education\",\"volume\":\"124 31\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
STEM 教育是培养 21 世纪技能的另一种选择,其前提是整合各组成学科。虽然有关这一主题的研究不胜枚举,但对 STEM 教师培训计划的讨论却并不广泛。因此,我们在 Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了系统的文献综述,以确定培训的意图以及此类教师培训计划的设计和实施。在确定的 15 篇文章中,有三组意向:提高知识水平、培养能力和技能、改变态度和观念。确定了五种方法策略:基于项目的学习、基于问题的学习、合作学习、ODR(观察/讨论/反思)方法和基于设计的学习。学科整合可以通过内容或能力来实现。结论是,基于设计的学习是最适合学科整合的策略。建议开展研究,衡量培训方式和时间对培养 STEM 能力的影响。
Characterization of STEM teacher education programs for disciplinary integration: A systematic review
STEM education is established as an alternative for developing 21st century skills, with the premise of integrating its component disciplines. Although numerous studies exist on the subject, STEM teacher training programs are not widely discussed. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science to identify the intentions of the training and the design and implementation of such teacher training programs. Among the 15 articles identified, there are three groups of intentions: Improving knowledge, developing competencies and skills, and changing attitudes and perceptions. Five methodological strategies were identified: project-based learning, problem-based learning, collaborative learning, ODR (observation/discussion/reflection) approach, and design-based learning. Disciplinary integration can be achieved through content or competencies. It is concluded that design-based learning is the most appropriate strategy for disciplinary integration. It is recommended that research be conducted to measure the impact of modality and time of training on the development of STEM competencies.
期刊介绍:
EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education is peer-reviewed and published 12 times in a year. The Journal is an Open Access Journal. The Journal strictly adheres to the principles of the peer review process. The EJMSTE Journal publishes original articles in the following areas: -Mathematics Education: Algebra Education, Geometry Education, Math Education, Statistics Education. -Science Education: Astronomy Education, Biology Education, Chemistry Education, Geographical and Environmental Education, Geoscience Education, Physics Education, Sustainability Education. -Engineering Education -STEM Education -Technology Education: Human Computer Interactions, Knowledge Management, Learning Management Systems, Distance Education, E-Learning, Blended Learning, ICT/Moodle in Education, Web 2.0 Tools for Education