(098) Does Early Implantation of Penile Prosthesis for Ischemic Priapism Associated with Decreased Complication Rate? A Systematic Review of Literature

Ischemic priapism (IP) is a prolonged undesired erection that accounts for >95% of all priapism episodes. Like compartment syndrome, it is characterized by diminished corporal blood flow and can lead to corporal fibrosis, penile shortening, and refractory erectile dysfunction. Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is the treatment option in IP to treat the priapic episode and to preserve erectile function. However, no standardization exists regarding the optimal timing of PP implantation surgery. The present review aims to systematically analyse the literature comparing early and delayed PP implantation in patients with IP. A systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to July 1st, 2023 and followed by hand searching. All the steps were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. We assess the quality of evidence and the risk of bias in each included study. Three retrospective cohort studies comprising 199 subjects were included in this systematic review. All studies have different definitions of the timing of early PP implantation, ranging from within one week to ≤6 months from the onset of priapism. Despite different types of PP used, all studies agreed that early PP implantation results in lower intraoperative complications, such as corporeal perforation and urethral injury, greater preservation of penile length and girth, and a lower rate of prosthetic revision. On the other hand, the delayed insertion was linked to a longer surgical time because of challenges brought on by fibrotic tissue, with most of them also requiring a smaller cylinder. In regards to post-operative complication, the majority of studies demonstrated that delayed implantation would result in a higher rate of complication rate; however, one study demonstrated that early PP implantation had a higher likelihood of prosthesis erosion and infection, which was believed due to a higher rate of bacterial invasion during the earlier shunt surgeries. The majority of current evidence favours early penile prosthesis insertion in term of lower complication rate for IP, especially the intraoperative complication, for IP, compared to the delayed implantation. Nevertheless, better quality evidence is still needed from RCT to determine the exact timing for early implantation, patient selection, and the best penile prosthesis types. No.