机器学习模型揭示了不同的疾病亚群,并提高了对 SCN8A 功能增益变异致病个体的诊断和预后准确性。

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY Biology Open Pub Date : 2024-04-15 Epub Date: 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1242/bio.060286
Joshua B Hack, Joseph C Watkins, Michael F Hammer
{"title":"机器学习模型揭示了不同的疾病亚群,并提高了对 SCN8A 功能增益变异致病个体的诊断和预后准确性。","authors":"Joshua B Hack, Joseph C Watkins, Michael F Hammer","doi":"10.1242/bio.060286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distinguishing clinical subgroups for patients suffering with diseases characterized by a wide phenotypic spectrum is essential for developing precision therapies. Patients with gain-of-function (GOF) variants in the SCN8A gene exhibit substantial clinical heterogeneity, viewed historically as a linear spectrum ranging from mild to severe. To test for hidden clinical subgroups, we applied two machine-learning algorithms to analyze a dataset of patient features collected by the International SCN8A Patient Registry. We used two research methodologies: a supervised approach that incorporated feature severity cutoffs based on clinical conventions, and an unsupervised approach employing an entirely data-driven strategy. Both approaches found statistical support for three distinct subgroups and were validated by correlation analyses using external variables. However, distinguishing features of the three subgroups within each approach were not concordant, suggesting a more complex phenotypic landscape. The unsupervised approach yielded strong support for a model involving three partially ordered subgroups rather than a linear spectrum. Application of these machine-learning approaches may lead to improved prognosis and clinical management of individuals with SCN8A GOF variants and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9216,"journal":{"name":"Biology Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11070785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning models reveal distinct disease subgroups and improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for individuals with pathogenic SCN8A gain-of-function variants.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua B Hack, Joseph C Watkins, Michael F Hammer\",\"doi\":\"10.1242/bio.060286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Distinguishing clinical subgroups for patients suffering with diseases characterized by a wide phenotypic spectrum is essential for developing precision therapies. Patients with gain-of-function (GOF) variants in the SCN8A gene exhibit substantial clinical heterogeneity, viewed historically as a linear spectrum ranging from mild to severe. To test for hidden clinical subgroups, we applied two machine-learning algorithms to analyze a dataset of patient features collected by the International SCN8A Patient Registry. We used two research methodologies: a supervised approach that incorporated feature severity cutoffs based on clinical conventions, and an unsupervised approach employing an entirely data-driven strategy. Both approaches found statistical support for three distinct subgroups and were validated by correlation analyses using external variables. However, distinguishing features of the three subgroups within each approach were not concordant, suggesting a more complex phenotypic landscape. The unsupervised approach yielded strong support for a model involving three partially ordered subgroups rather than a linear spectrum. Application of these machine-learning approaches may lead to improved prognosis and clinical management of individuals with SCN8A GOF variants and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of the disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11070785/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.060286\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Open","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.060286","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于表型谱广泛的疾病患者,区分临床亚组对于开发精准疗法至关重要。SCN8A基因功能增益(GOF)变异患者表现出很大的临床异质性,历来被视为从轻度到重度的线性谱系。为了测试隐藏的临床亚群,我们应用了两种机器学习算法来分析国际 SCN8A 患者登记处收集的患者特征数据集。我们采用了两种研究方法:一种是基于临床习惯的特征严重程度截断的监督方法,另一种是完全采用数据驱动策略的无监督方法。这两种方法都在统计学上支持三个不同的亚组,并通过利用外部变量的相关分析进行了验证。然而,每种方法中三个亚组的区别特征并不一致,这表明表型情况更为复杂。无监督方法对涉及三个部分有序亚群而非线性谱系的模型产生了强有力的支持。这些机器学习方法的应用可能会改善SCN8A GOF变体患者的预后和临床管理,并为了解该疾病的潜在机制提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning models reveal distinct disease subgroups and improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for individuals with pathogenic SCN8A gain-of-function variants.

Distinguishing clinical subgroups for patients suffering with diseases characterized by a wide phenotypic spectrum is essential for developing precision therapies. Patients with gain-of-function (GOF) variants in the SCN8A gene exhibit substantial clinical heterogeneity, viewed historically as a linear spectrum ranging from mild to severe. To test for hidden clinical subgroups, we applied two machine-learning algorithms to analyze a dataset of patient features collected by the International SCN8A Patient Registry. We used two research methodologies: a supervised approach that incorporated feature severity cutoffs based on clinical conventions, and an unsupervised approach employing an entirely data-driven strategy. Both approaches found statistical support for three distinct subgroups and were validated by correlation analyses using external variables. However, distinguishing features of the three subgroups within each approach were not concordant, suggesting a more complex phenotypic landscape. The unsupervised approach yielded strong support for a model involving three partially ordered subgroups rather than a linear spectrum. Application of these machine-learning approaches may lead to improved prognosis and clinical management of individuals with SCN8A GOF variants and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of the disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Open
Biology Open BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology Open (BiO) is an online Open Access journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research across all aspects of the biological sciences. BiO aims to provide rapid publication for scientifically sound observations and valid conclusions, without a requirement for perceived impact.
期刊最新文献
Preparation of soluble and functional recombinant HTLV-1 Tax protein using bacterial chaperones. Oxidative stress: A sex specific cost of parental care. Interferon signaling is required for early neutrophil recruitment after zebrafish heart injury. Worms about town: a citizen science project discovers microsporidian parasites of nematodes through environmental sampling. Cat brains age like humans: Translating Time shows pet cats live to be natural models for human aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1