部分肠内营养作为生物制剂附加疗法对难治性克罗恩病患者的疗效:一项试点研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2024-02-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otae011
Olga Maria Nardone, Giulio Calabrese, Alessia La Mantia, Anna Testa, Antonio Rispo, Lucia Alfonsi, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Fabiana Castiglione
{"title":"部分肠内营养作为生物制剂附加疗法对难治性克罗恩病患者的疗效:一项试点研究。","authors":"Olga Maria Nardone, Giulio Calabrese, Alessia La Mantia, Anna Testa, Antonio Rispo, Lucia Alfonsi, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Fabiana Castiglione","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial enteral nutrition (PEN) is a well-established treatment for children with Crohn's disease (CD). However, its efficacy in adults with CD remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEN as an add-on to escalated biological therapy in adults with CD who have lost response to biologics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients who had lost response to biologics and received PEN in combination with escalated treatment, compared to those treated only with escalated therapy. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (CR) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included transmural healing (TH) and response (TR) rates along with selected clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients were screened; 12 (28.6%) were excluded for complicated disease and 30 (71.4%) were included in the final analysis. Fourteen (46.7%) patients completed PEN treatment at 8 weeks, while 16 patients (53.3%) discontinued treatment due to intolerance and continued with escalation of biologic (BT group). At 24 weeks, 9 patients (64.3%) in the PEN group achieved CR, compared to 4 patients (25%) in the BT group (<i>P</i> = .03). The TR rate was 64.9% in the PEN group and 25% in the BT group (<i>P</i> = .03). Patients receiving PEN exhibited an increase in albumin levels compared to those in the BT group (<i>Δ</i> = 0.5; <i>P</i> = .02). A higher rate of therapy changes (68.7%) was observed in the BT group compared to 14.2% in the PEN group (<i>P</i> = .004). Prior failure to 2 lines of biological therapy was associated with adherence to PEN (OR = 1.583; CI = 1.06-2.36; <i>P</i> = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who had lost response to biologics, PEN in combination with escalated biologics was associated with CR and TR and improved nutritional status. Hence, the addition of PEN should be considered for patients with difficult-to-treat CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"6 1","pages":"otae011"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Partial Enteral Nutrition as Add-On to Biologics in Patients With Refractory and Difficult-to-Treat Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Olga Maria Nardone, Giulio Calabrese, Alessia La Mantia, Anna Testa, Antonio Rispo, Lucia Alfonsi, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Fabiana Castiglione\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otae011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial enteral nutrition (PEN) is a well-established treatment for children with Crohn's disease (CD). However, its efficacy in adults with CD remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEN as an add-on to escalated biological therapy in adults with CD who have lost response to biologics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients who had lost response to biologics and received PEN in combination with escalated treatment, compared to those treated only with escalated therapy. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (CR) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included transmural healing (TH) and response (TR) rates along with selected clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients were screened; 12 (28.6%) were excluded for complicated disease and 30 (71.4%) were included in the final analysis. Fourteen (46.7%) patients completed PEN treatment at 8 weeks, while 16 patients (53.3%) discontinued treatment due to intolerance and continued with escalation of biologic (BT group). At 24 weeks, 9 patients (64.3%) in the PEN group achieved CR, compared to 4 patients (25%) in the BT group (<i>P</i> = .03). The TR rate was 64.9% in the PEN group and 25% in the BT group (<i>P</i> = .03). Patients receiving PEN exhibited an increase in albumin levels compared to those in the BT group (<i>Δ</i> = 0.5; <i>P</i> = .02). A higher rate of therapy changes (68.7%) was observed in the BT group compared to 14.2% in the PEN group (<i>P</i> = .004). Prior failure to 2 lines of biological therapy was associated with adherence to PEN (OR = 1.583; CI = 1.06-2.36; <i>P</i> = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients who had lost response to biologics, PEN in combination with escalated biologics was associated with CR and TR and improved nutritional status. Hence, the addition of PEN should be considered for patients with difficult-to-treat CD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"otae011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:部分肠内营养(PEN)是治疗克罗恩病(CD)儿童的一种行之有效的方法。然而,它对成人克罗恩病患者的疗效仍不确定。我们的目的是评估肠内营养补充剂作为生物制剂治疗无效的成人克罗恩病患者升级生物制剂治疗的附加疗法的有效性:我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象包括对生物制剂失去反应的患者,与仅接受升级疗法的患者相比,他们在接受升级疗法的同时接受了五联疗法。主要终点是24周时的无类固醇临床缓解(CR)。次要终点包括硬膜愈合率(TH)和反应率(TR)以及部分临床结果:共筛选出 42 名患者,其中 12 人(28.6%)因病情复杂而被排除,30 人(71.4%)被纳入最终分析。14名患者(46.7%)在8周时完成了PEN治疗,16名患者(53.3%)因不耐受而中断治疗,继续接受生物制剂升级治疗(BT组)。24 周时,笔治疗组有 9 名患者(64.3%)达到 CR,而 BT 组有 4 名患者(25%)达到 CR(P = 0.03)。PEN组的TR率为64.9%,BT组为25%(P = .03)。与 BT 组相比,接受 PEN 治疗的患者白蛋白水平有所提高(Δ = 0.5;P = .02)。BT组患者的治疗更换率(68.7%)高于PEN组的14.2%(P = .004)。曾接受两线生物疗法失败的患者与坚持使用 PEN 相关(OR = 1.583;CI = 1.06-2.36;P = .01):结论:在对生物制剂失去反应的患者中,五联活疫苗联合升级的生物制剂与CR和TR以及营养状况的改善相关。因此,对于难以治疗的 CD 患者,应考虑加用 PEN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Partial Enteral Nutrition as Add-On to Biologics in Patients With Refractory and Difficult-to-Treat Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study.

Background: Partial enteral nutrition (PEN) is a well-established treatment for children with Crohn's disease (CD). However, its efficacy in adults with CD remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEN as an add-on to escalated biological therapy in adults with CD who have lost response to biologics.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients who had lost response to biologics and received PEN in combination with escalated treatment, compared to those treated only with escalated therapy. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (CR) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included transmural healing (TH) and response (TR) rates along with selected clinical outcomes.

Results: Forty-two patients were screened; 12 (28.6%) were excluded for complicated disease and 30 (71.4%) were included in the final analysis. Fourteen (46.7%) patients completed PEN treatment at 8 weeks, while 16 patients (53.3%) discontinued treatment due to intolerance and continued with escalation of biologic (BT group). At 24 weeks, 9 patients (64.3%) in the PEN group achieved CR, compared to 4 patients (25%) in the BT group (P = .03). The TR rate was 64.9% in the PEN group and 25% in the BT group (P = .03). Patients receiving PEN exhibited an increase in albumin levels compared to those in the BT group (Δ = 0.5; P = .02). A higher rate of therapy changes (68.7%) was observed in the BT group compared to 14.2% in the PEN group (P = .004). Prior failure to 2 lines of biological therapy was associated with adherence to PEN (OR = 1.583; CI = 1.06-2.36; P = .01).

Conclusions: In patients who had lost response to biologics, PEN in combination with escalated biologics was associated with CR and TR and improved nutritional status. Hence, the addition of PEN should be considered for patients with difficult-to-treat CD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Small Bowel Neoplasms in Crohn's Disease: A Case-Control Study. Clinical Features of Thiopurine-Induced Acute Pancreatitis: Comparison Between Patients With and Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Certolizumab Pegol Treatment in Patients With Crohn's Disease: Final Safety Data From the SECURE Registry. Understanding the Lived Experience After Colectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Qualitative Study. The Natural History of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Adults With Common Variable Immunodeficiency: A Case Series From a Single US Tertiary Care Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1