异种移植物接受者的密切接触者:异种动物传染病风险带来的伦理考虑。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Xenotransplantation Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1111/xen.12847
Daniel J Hurst, Luz Padilla, Daniel Rodger, Tamar Schiff, David K C Cooper
{"title":"异种移植物接受者的密切接触者:异种动物传染病风险带来的伦理考虑。","authors":"Daniel J Hurst, Luz Padilla, Daniel Rodger, Tamar Schiff, David K C Cooper","doi":"10.1111/xen.12847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With decades of pre-clinical studies culminating in the recent clinical application of xenotransplantation, it would appear timely to provide recommendations for operationalizing oversight of xenotransplantation clinical trials. Ethical issues with clinical xenotransplantation have been described for decades, largely centering on animal welfare, the risks posed to the recipient, and public health risks posed by potential spread of xenozoonosis. Much less attention has been given to considerations relating to potentially elevated risks faced by those who may care for or otherwise have close contact with xenograft recipients. This paper examines the ethical and logistical issues raised by the potential exposure to xenozoonotic disease faced by close contacts of xenotransplant recipients-defined herein as including but not limited to caregivers, household contacts, and sexual partners-which warrants special attention given their increased risk of exposure to infection compared to the general public. We discuss implications of assent or consent by these close contacts to potentially undergo, along with the recipient, procedures for infection screening and possible quarantine. We then propose several options and recommendations for operationalizing oversight of xenotransplantation clinical trials that could account for and address close contacts' education on and agency regarding the risk of xenozoonosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23866,"journal":{"name":"Xenotransplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Close contacts of xenograft recipients: Ethical considerations due to risk of xenozoonosis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J Hurst, Luz Padilla, Daniel Rodger, Tamar Schiff, David K C Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/xen.12847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With decades of pre-clinical studies culminating in the recent clinical application of xenotransplantation, it would appear timely to provide recommendations for operationalizing oversight of xenotransplantation clinical trials. Ethical issues with clinical xenotransplantation have been described for decades, largely centering on animal welfare, the risks posed to the recipient, and public health risks posed by potential spread of xenozoonosis. Much less attention has been given to considerations relating to potentially elevated risks faced by those who may care for or otherwise have close contact with xenograft recipients. This paper examines the ethical and logistical issues raised by the potential exposure to xenozoonotic disease faced by close contacts of xenotransplant recipients-defined herein as including but not limited to caregivers, household contacts, and sexual partners-which warrants special attention given their increased risk of exposure to infection compared to the general public. We discuss implications of assent or consent by these close contacts to potentially undergo, along with the recipient, procedures for infection screening and possible quarantine. We then propose several options and recommendations for operationalizing oversight of xenotransplantation clinical trials that could account for and address close contacts' education on and agency regarding the risk of xenozoonosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Xenotransplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Xenotransplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.12847\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Xenotransplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.12847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经过数十年的临床前研究,异种移植最近终于应用于临床,因此,现在似乎是对异种移植临床试验的监督工作提出建议的时候了。临床异种移植的伦理问题已被描述了几十年,主要集中在动物福利、对受体造成的风险以及异种动物传染病潜在传播造成的公共卫生风险等方面。对于那些可能照顾异种移植物受体或以其他方式与之密切接触的人所面临的潜在高风险,人们的关注要少得多。本文探讨了异种移植受者的密切接触者(此处定义为包括但不限于照顾者、家庭接触者和性伴侣)可能面临的感染异种动物疾病风险所引发的伦理和后勤问题。我们讨论了这些密切接触者同意或同意与受者一起接受感染筛查和可能的隔离程序的影响。然后,我们提出了对异种移植临床试验进行操作监督的几种方案和建议,这些方案和建议可以考虑并解决密切接触者在异种动物传染病风险方面的教育和代理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Close contacts of xenograft recipients: Ethical considerations due to risk of xenozoonosis.

With decades of pre-clinical studies culminating in the recent clinical application of xenotransplantation, it would appear timely to provide recommendations for operationalizing oversight of xenotransplantation clinical trials. Ethical issues with clinical xenotransplantation have been described for decades, largely centering on animal welfare, the risks posed to the recipient, and public health risks posed by potential spread of xenozoonosis. Much less attention has been given to considerations relating to potentially elevated risks faced by those who may care for or otherwise have close contact with xenograft recipients. This paper examines the ethical and logistical issues raised by the potential exposure to xenozoonotic disease faced by close contacts of xenotransplant recipients-defined herein as including but not limited to caregivers, household contacts, and sexual partners-which warrants special attention given their increased risk of exposure to infection compared to the general public. We discuss implications of assent or consent by these close contacts to potentially undergo, along with the recipient, procedures for infection screening and possible quarantine. We then propose several options and recommendations for operationalizing oversight of xenotransplantation clinical trials that could account for and address close contacts' education on and agency regarding the risk of xenozoonosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Xenotransplantation
Xenotransplantation 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Xenotransplantation provides its readership with rapid communication of new findings in the field of organ and tissue transplantation across species barriers.The journal is not only of interest to those whose primary area is xenotransplantation, but also to veterinarians, microbiologists and geneticists. It also investigates and reports on the controversial theological, ethical, legal and psychological implications of xenotransplantation.
期刊最新文献
Xenotransplantation Literature Update December 2023–June 2024 Intensive Surveillance of Porcine-Rhesus Kidney Xenotransplant Using Different Ultrasound Techniques. Anti-Non-Gal Antibodies Against Porcine Protein Antigens as Barrier to Long-Term Grafting of Xenografts in Humans. Comparative Inhibitory Effects of Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, and Rapamycin on Human Anti-Pig Xenogeneic Mixed Lymphocyte Reactions. An Approach to Controlling Inflammation and Coagulation in Pig-to-Baboon Cardiac Xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1