冲刺团队方法迅速改善了 Leapfrog 质量指标。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-22-00223
Ghazala Q Sharieff, Craig Uejo
{"title":"冲刺团队方法迅速改善了 Leapfrog 质量指标。","authors":"Ghazala Q Sharieff, Craig Uejo","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-22-00223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Patient safety and quality care are two critical areas that every healthcare organization strives to grow and improve upon. At Scripps Health, specific efforts reviewed for this article were implemented to reduce hospital-acquired conditions and hospital readmissions that are components of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services programs and Leapfrog Hospital Survey scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sprint teams, a novel approach to rapidly develop a checklist for lower-performing care improvement areas, were implemented after an internal review of existing tools and an evidence-based literature review. These areas included catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), Clostridioides difficile (C. diff.) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure readmissions, surgical site infections and handwashing, bar coding, and the computerized physician order entry components of Leapfrog scoring. The checklist for each area served as a teaching tool for staff and a guideline for case review to ensure that standard work was routinely performed.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The sprint teams showed dramatic results in the initial focus areas. From a baseline standardized infection ratio (SIR) of 1.141 for CLABSIs, the sprint team reduced the SIR to 0.885 in Year 1 of the program and to 0.687 in Year 2. For CAUTIs, the SIR decreased from a baseline of 1.391 in Year 1 to 0.720 in Year 2. C. diff. infections fell from 0.422 to 0.315 in Year 1 and to 0.260 in Year 2. While the MRSA SIR did not improve during the first year, the MRSA reduction sprint team showed success in Year 2 with a decrease in the SIR from 0.537 to 0.245. Readmission reduction sprint teams focused on heart failure, COPD, and total hip and knee complications. The teams also achieved positive results in reducing readmissions by following checklists and reviewing each readmission case for justification.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Rapid change can be safely and effectively implemented with multidisciplinary sprint teams. Developed with an evidence-based, case review approach, sprint team checklists can help to standardize processes for the review of any infections or readmissions that occur in the inpatient arena.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sprint Team Approach Yields Rapid Improvement in Leapfrog Quality Indicators.\",\"authors\":\"Ghazala Q Sharieff, Craig Uejo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHM-D-22-00223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Patient safety and quality care are two critical areas that every healthcare organization strives to grow and improve upon. At Scripps Health, specific efforts reviewed for this article were implemented to reduce hospital-acquired conditions and hospital readmissions that are components of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services programs and Leapfrog Hospital Survey scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sprint teams, a novel approach to rapidly develop a checklist for lower-performing care improvement areas, were implemented after an internal review of existing tools and an evidence-based literature review. These areas included catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), Clostridioides difficile (C. diff.) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure readmissions, surgical site infections and handwashing, bar coding, and the computerized physician order entry components of Leapfrog scoring. The checklist for each area served as a teaching tool for staff and a guideline for case review to ensure that standard work was routinely performed.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The sprint teams showed dramatic results in the initial focus areas. From a baseline standardized infection ratio (SIR) of 1.141 for CLABSIs, the sprint team reduced the SIR to 0.885 in Year 1 of the program and to 0.687 in Year 2. For CAUTIs, the SIR decreased from a baseline of 1.391 in Year 1 to 0.720 in Year 2. C. diff. infections fell from 0.422 to 0.315 in Year 1 and to 0.260 in Year 2. While the MRSA SIR did not improve during the first year, the MRSA reduction sprint team showed success in Year 2 with a decrease in the SIR from 0.537 to 0.245. Readmission reduction sprint teams focused on heart failure, COPD, and total hip and knee complications. The teams also achieved positive results in reducing readmissions by following checklists and reviewing each readmission case for justification.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Rapid change can be safely and effectively implemented with multidisciplinary sprint teams. Developed with an evidence-based, case review approach, sprint team checklists can help to standardize processes for the review of any infections or readmissions that occur in the inpatient arena.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-22-00223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-22-00223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:患者安全和优质护理是每个医疗机构努力发展和改进的两个关键领域。在斯克里普斯医疗中心,本文回顾了为减少医院获得性病症和再入院率所做的具体工作,这些病症和再入院率是联邦医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心计划和 Leapfrog 医院调查得分的组成部分:在对现有工具和循证文献进行内部审查后,实施了冲刺小组,这是一种针对表现较差的护理改进领域快速制定检查清单的新方法。这些领域包括导管相关尿路感染(CAUTIs)、中心管相关血流感染(CLABSIs)、艰难梭菌(C. diff.)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和心力衰竭再入院率、手术部位感染和洗手、条形码以及 Leapfrog 评分中的计算机医嘱输入部分。每个领域的核对表既是员工的教学工具,也是病例审查的指南,以确保标准工作得到例行执行:冲刺小组在最初的重点领域取得了显著成效。CLABSIs 的基线标准化感染率 (SIR) 为 1.141,冲刺小组在计划实施的第一年将 SIR 降至 0.885,第二年降至 0.687。在 CAUTI 方面,SIR 从第一年的基线 1.391 降至第二年的 0.720。C. diff. 感染从第 1 年的 0.422 降至 0.315,第 2 年降至 0.260。虽然 MRSA SIR 在第一年没有改善,但减少 MRSA 冲刺小组在第二年取得了成功,SIR 从 0.537 降至 0.245。减少再入院冲刺小组重点关注心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺病以及全髋关节和膝关节并发症。这些团队还通过遵循核对表和审查每个再入院病例的合理性,在减少再入院方面取得了积极成果:实际应用:多学科冲刺团队可以安全有效地实施快速变革。冲刺团队核对表采用循证病例审查方法,有助于规范住院病人感染或再入院病例的审查流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sprint Team Approach Yields Rapid Improvement in Leapfrog Quality Indicators.

Goal: Patient safety and quality care are two critical areas that every healthcare organization strives to grow and improve upon. At Scripps Health, specific efforts reviewed for this article were implemented to reduce hospital-acquired conditions and hospital readmissions that are components of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services programs and Leapfrog Hospital Survey scores.

Methods: Sprint teams, a novel approach to rapidly develop a checklist for lower-performing care improvement areas, were implemented after an internal review of existing tools and an evidence-based literature review. These areas included catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central-line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), Clostridioides difficile (C. diff.) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure readmissions, surgical site infections and handwashing, bar coding, and the computerized physician order entry components of Leapfrog scoring. The checklist for each area served as a teaching tool for staff and a guideline for case review to ensure that standard work was routinely performed.

Principal findings: The sprint teams showed dramatic results in the initial focus areas. From a baseline standardized infection ratio (SIR) of 1.141 for CLABSIs, the sprint team reduced the SIR to 0.885 in Year 1 of the program and to 0.687 in Year 2. For CAUTIs, the SIR decreased from a baseline of 1.391 in Year 1 to 0.720 in Year 2. C. diff. infections fell from 0.422 to 0.315 in Year 1 and to 0.260 in Year 2. While the MRSA SIR did not improve during the first year, the MRSA reduction sprint team showed success in Year 2 with a decrease in the SIR from 0.537 to 0.245. Readmission reduction sprint teams focused on heart failure, COPD, and total hip and knee complications. The teams also achieved positive results in reducing readmissions by following checklists and reviewing each readmission case for justification.

Practical applications: Rapid change can be safely and effectively implemented with multidisciplinary sprint teams. Developed with an evidence-based, case review approach, sprint team checklists can help to standardize processes for the review of any infections or readmissions that occur in the inpatient arena.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
期刊最新文献
A New Era for the Patient Safety Imperative. An Exploratory Study of Dynamic Capabilities and Performance Improvement in Hospitals. Associations Between Integration and Patient Experience in Hospital-Based Health Systems: An Exploration of Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Integration. Associations Between Organizational Support, Burnout, and Professional Fulfillment Among US Physicians During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Burke Kline, DHA, FACHE, CHFP, CEO, Jefferson Community Health & Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1