住院多病患者全科护理的绩效管理--基于价值的护理的范围界定综述。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-02-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2023.1147565
Jia En Joy Khoo, Cher Wee Lim, Yi Feng Lai
{"title":"住院多病患者全科护理的绩效管理--基于价值的护理的范围界定综述。","authors":"Jia En Joy Khoo, Cher Wee Lim, Yi Feng Lai","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2023.1147565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given the shift towards value-based healthcare and the increasing recognition of generalist care, enacting value-based healthcare for generalist care is critical. This work aims to shed light on how to conduct performance management of generalist care to facilitate value-based care, with a focus on medical care of hospitalised patients.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A scoping review of published literature was conducted. 30 publications which were relevant to performance management of generalist medical inpatient care were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The performance measures used across the studies were analysed and other qualitative findings were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report an overall lack of research on performance management methods for generalist inpatient care. Relevant performance measures found include both outcome and process of care measures and both clinical and reported measures, with clinical outcome measures the most frequently reported. Length of stay, readmission rates and mortality were the most frequently reported. The insights from the papers emphasise the relevance of process of care measures for performance management, the advantages and disadvantages of types of measures and provide suggestions relevant for performance management of generalist inpatient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this scoping review outline a variety of performance measures valuable for generalist inpatient care including clinical outcome measures, reported outcome measures and process of care measures. The findings also suggest directions for implementation of such performance management, including emphasis on physician level performance management and the importance of documentation training. Further research for selecting and operationalising the measures for specific contexts and developing a comprehensive performance management system involving these measures will be important for achieving value-based healthcare for generalist inpatient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"3 ","pages":"1147565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10925702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance management of generalist care for hospitalised multimorbid patients-a scoping review for value-based care.\",\"authors\":\"Jia En Joy Khoo, Cher Wee Lim, Yi Feng Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2023.1147565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given the shift towards value-based healthcare and the increasing recognition of generalist care, enacting value-based healthcare for generalist care is critical. This work aims to shed light on how to conduct performance management of generalist care to facilitate value-based care, with a focus on medical care of hospitalised patients.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A scoping review of published literature was conducted. 30 publications which were relevant to performance management of generalist medical inpatient care were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The performance measures used across the studies were analysed and other qualitative findings were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We report an overall lack of research on performance management methods for generalist inpatient care. Relevant performance measures found include both outcome and process of care measures and both clinical and reported measures, with clinical outcome measures the most frequently reported. Length of stay, readmission rates and mortality were the most frequently reported. The insights from the papers emphasise the relevance of process of care measures for performance management, the advantages and disadvantages of types of measures and provide suggestions relevant for performance management of generalist inpatient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this scoping review outline a variety of performance measures valuable for generalist inpatient care including clinical outcome measures, reported outcome measures and process of care measures. The findings also suggest directions for implementation of such performance management, including emphasis on physician level performance management and the importance of documentation training. Further research for selecting and operationalising the measures for specific contexts and developing a comprehensive performance management system involving these measures will be important for achieving value-based healthcare for generalist inpatient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"1147565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10925702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1147565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1147565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:鉴于医疗保健向以价值为基础的转变,以及对全科护理的日益认可,为全科护理制定以价值为基础的医疗保健至关重要。这项工作旨在阐明如何对全科护理进行绩效管理,以促进以价值为基础的护理,重点关注住院患者的医疗护理:对已发表的文献进行了范围界定。30篇与住院病人全科医疗护理绩效管理相关的文献被纳入综述:结果:我们对所有研究中使用的绩效衡量标准进行了分析,并获得了其他定性结果:结果:我们报告称,总体上缺乏对全科住院护理绩效管理方法的研究。发现的相关绩效衡量标准包括结果和护理过程衡量标准,以及临床和报告衡量标准,其中临床结果衡量标准最常被报告。报告最多的是住院时间、再入院率和死亡率。论文中的见解强调了护理过程测量与绩效管理的相关性、测量类型的优缺点,并为普通住院患者护理的绩效管理提供了相关建议:本次范围界定审查的结果概述了对普通住院病人护理有价值的各种绩效衡量标准,包括临床结果衡量标准、报告结果衡量标准和护理过程衡量标准。研究结果还提出了实施此类绩效管理的方向,包括强调医生层面的绩效管理和文件培训的重要性。进一步研究如何针对具体情况选择和实施衡量标准,以及如何开发一个包含这些衡量标准的综合绩效管理系统,对于实现以价值为导向的全科住院护理医疗服务非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance management of generalist care for hospitalised multimorbid patients-a scoping review for value-based care.

Objectives: Given the shift towards value-based healthcare and the increasing recognition of generalist care, enacting value-based healthcare for generalist care is critical. This work aims to shed light on how to conduct performance management of generalist care to facilitate value-based care, with a focus on medical care of hospitalised patients.

Design and setting: A scoping review of published literature was conducted. 30 publications which were relevant to performance management of generalist medical inpatient care were included in the review.

Outcome measures: The performance measures used across the studies were analysed and other qualitative findings were also obtained.

Results: We report an overall lack of research on performance management methods for generalist inpatient care. Relevant performance measures found include both outcome and process of care measures and both clinical and reported measures, with clinical outcome measures the most frequently reported. Length of stay, readmission rates and mortality were the most frequently reported. The insights from the papers emphasise the relevance of process of care measures for performance management, the advantages and disadvantages of types of measures and provide suggestions relevant for performance management of generalist inpatient care.

Conclusion: The findings of this scoping review outline a variety of performance measures valuable for generalist inpatient care including clinical outcome measures, reported outcome measures and process of care measures. The findings also suggest directions for implementation of such performance management, including emphasis on physician level performance management and the importance of documentation training. Further research for selecting and operationalising the measures for specific contexts and developing a comprehensive performance management system involving these measures will be important for achieving value-based healthcare for generalist inpatient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1