制定接受全覆盖冠的牙齿指数

Amit Porwal, Anurag Satpathy
{"title":"制定接受全覆盖冠的牙齿指数","authors":"Amit Porwal, Anurag Satpathy","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a system for assessment of the status of a tooth to receive a full coverage crown and depict it on a measurable scale, and to validate its use by assessing examiner reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The index was developed based on the inputs from experts in the field with a consensus on factors (4 periodontal, 2 endodontic, and 4 prosthodontic), stages of severity (stage 1 to stage 4), assigned scores, and relative weights pertaining to varied clinical scenarios. Based on the selection of factor-stage combination, an overall tooth crownability index (TCI) score along with three-factor scores were computed. The validation study included clinical and radiological assessment of cases based on the index criteria by four independent examiners (periodontist, prosthodontist, endodontist, and general practitioner).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty teeth were assessed. The distribution of repeated selection by the examiners was quite identical to the initial (kappa = 0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of examiners in TCI and factorial scores. An excellent agreement between the measurements was observed among the examiners (ICC =0.993; Crohnbach α = 0.993).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A tooth crownability index has been developed for a tooth to receive a full coverage crown which has an excellent agreement and good reproducibility among the examiners. TCI will serve as a baseline tool in treatment plan decision-making based on the status of the teeth and in research for evaluating the efficacy of various treatment options available (standard criteria for outcome assessment).</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an Index for a Tooth to Receive a Full-Coverage Crown.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Porwal, Anurag Satpathy\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a system for assessment of the status of a tooth to receive a full coverage crown and depict it on a measurable scale, and to validate its use by assessing examiner reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The index was developed based on the inputs from experts in the field with a consensus on factors (4 periodontal, 2 endodontic, and 4 prosthodontic), stages of severity (stage 1 to stage 4), assigned scores, and relative weights pertaining to varied clinical scenarios. Based on the selection of factor-stage combination, an overall tooth crownability index (TCI) score along with three-factor scores were computed. The validation study included clinical and radiological assessment of cases based on the index criteria by four independent examiners (periodontist, prosthodontist, endodontist, and general practitioner).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty teeth were assessed. The distribution of repeated selection by the examiners was quite identical to the initial (kappa = 0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of examiners in TCI and factorial scores. An excellent agreement between the measurements was observed among the examiners (ICC =0.993; Crohnbach α = 0.993).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A tooth crownability index has been developed for a tooth to receive a full coverage crown which has an excellent agreement and good reproducibility among the examiners. TCI will serve as a baseline tool in treatment plan decision-making based on the status of the teeth and in research for evaluating the efficacy of various treatment options available (standard criteria for outcome assessment).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发一套系统来评估牙齿接受全覆盖冠的状况,并将其描述在一个可测量的量表上,同时通过评估检查者的再现性来验证其使用:该指数是根据该领域专家的意见和共识制定的,包括因素(4 个牙周因素、2 个牙髓因素和 4 个修复因素)、严重程度阶段(第 1 阶段至第 4 阶段)、指定分数以及与不同临床情况相关的相对权重。根据选择的因子-阶段组合,计算出牙齿可冠性指数(TCI)总分和三个因子得分。验证研究包括由四位独立检查人员(牙周病学家、修复学家、牙髓病学家和全科医生)根据指数标准对病例进行临床和放射学评估:结果:共评估了 40 颗牙齿。检查者重复选择的分布情况与最初的相当一致(kappa = 0.93)。在 TCI 和因子评分方面,检查者的平均分没有明显的统计学差异。检查者之间的测量结果非常一致(ICC =0.993; Crohnbach α = 0.993):为接受全覆盖牙冠的牙齿制定了可冠性指数,该指数在检查者之间具有极佳的一致性和良好的再现性。TCI 将作为根据牙齿状况制定治疗计划的基准工具,并在研究中用于评估各种治疗方案的疗效(结果评估的标准)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of an Index for a Tooth to Receive a Full-Coverage Crown.

Purpose: To develop a system for assessment of the status of a tooth to receive a full coverage crown and depict it on a measurable scale, and to validate its use by assessing examiner reproducibility.

Methods: The index was developed based on the inputs from experts in the field with a consensus on factors (4 periodontal, 2 endodontic, and 4 prosthodontic), stages of severity (stage 1 to stage 4), assigned scores, and relative weights pertaining to varied clinical scenarios. Based on the selection of factor-stage combination, an overall tooth crownability index (TCI) score along with three-factor scores were computed. The validation study included clinical and radiological assessment of cases based on the index criteria by four independent examiners (periodontist, prosthodontist, endodontist, and general practitioner).

Results: Forty teeth were assessed. The distribution of repeated selection by the examiners was quite identical to the initial (kappa = 0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of examiners in TCI and factorial scores. An excellent agreement between the measurements was observed among the examiners (ICC =0.993; Crohnbach α = 0.993).

Conclusions: A tooth crownability index has been developed for a tooth to receive a full coverage crown which has an excellent agreement and good reproducibility among the examiners. TCI will serve as a baseline tool in treatment plan decision-making based on the status of the teeth and in research for evaluating the efficacy of various treatment options available (standard criteria for outcome assessment).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Workflow for Rehabilitation of Severely Discolored Teeth Due to Red Staining from Endodontic Material. Influence of Different Cements on Bonding Efficiency Between Implant Abutment and Standard Restoration. Thirty-Year Clinical Performance of Double-Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures - A Practice-Based Retrospective Study. Evaluation of the Bond Strengths Between Dental Ceramics and Co-Cr Frameworks Made with Digital and Conventional Techniques. 3D-Printed Permanent Resin Crowns on Pre-Molar and Molar Teeth; Two-Year Results of a Prospective Clinical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1