将选择点纳入创伤后应激障碍分离亚型的正念训练:病例报告

My Ngoc To , Zev Schuman-Olivier
{"title":"将选择点纳入创伤后应激障碍分离亚型的正念训练:病例报告","authors":"My Ngoc To ,&nbsp;Zev Schuman-Olivier","doi":"10.1016/j.psycr.2024.100218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Approximately 15–30 % of individuals diagnosed with PTSD experience high levels of dissociation, a condition categorized in the DSM-V as a dissociative subtype of PTSD (PTSD-D). Despite the rising number of studies supporting mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for the treatment of PTSD, literature on mindfulness and dissociation remains scarce and discording. While best practices for offering mindfulness for dissociative patients remain unclear, integrating choice points into MBIs may be aligned with trauma-informed principles and effective in countering loss of self-agency associated with trauma. In this article, we present a case study from a larger randomized controlled trial of an individual with PTSD-D who successfully completed an 8-week MBI while displaying active dissociation symptoms throughout the group. Follow-up interviews with stakeholders in the patient's care as well as pre-and post-intervention assessments indicate that the patient had a positive experience with the mindfulness training and improved self-regulation. Analysis of the case study suggests that the mindfulness training may have been safe and effective for this patient due to the integration of choice points throughout the mindfulness training and promotion of structural safety. We expand on this by further discussing six influencing factors that contributed to the outcome of the case study and can serve as a reference for clinicians, researchers, and instructors who wish to offer MBIs safely to patients with PTSD-D.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74594,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research case reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773021224000142/pdfft?md5=49386426d9c0d34d741ef6b5a9fa73d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2773021224000142-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating choice points into mindfulness training for the dissociative subtype of PTSD: A case report\",\"authors\":\"My Ngoc To ,&nbsp;Zev Schuman-Olivier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psycr.2024.100218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Approximately 15–30 % of individuals diagnosed with PTSD experience high levels of dissociation, a condition categorized in the DSM-V as a dissociative subtype of PTSD (PTSD-D). Despite the rising number of studies supporting mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for the treatment of PTSD, literature on mindfulness and dissociation remains scarce and discording. While best practices for offering mindfulness for dissociative patients remain unclear, integrating choice points into MBIs may be aligned with trauma-informed principles and effective in countering loss of self-agency associated with trauma. In this article, we present a case study from a larger randomized controlled trial of an individual with PTSD-D who successfully completed an 8-week MBI while displaying active dissociation symptoms throughout the group. Follow-up interviews with stakeholders in the patient's care as well as pre-and post-intervention assessments indicate that the patient had a positive experience with the mindfulness training and improved self-regulation. Analysis of the case study suggests that the mindfulness training may have been safe and effective for this patient due to the integration of choice points throughout the mindfulness training and promotion of structural safety. We expand on this by further discussing six influencing factors that contributed to the outcome of the case study and can serve as a reference for clinicians, researchers, and instructors who wish to offer MBIs safely to patients with PTSD-D.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry research case reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773021224000142/pdfft?md5=49386426d9c0d34d741ef6b5a9fa73d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2773021224000142-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry research case reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773021224000142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research case reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773021224000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在被诊断为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患者中,约有 15-30% 的人存在高度解离现象,这种情况在 DSM-V 中被归类为创伤后应激障碍的解离亚型(PTSD-D)。尽管支持正念干预(MBIs)治疗创伤后应激障碍的研究越来越多,但有关正念和解离的文献仍然稀缺且不一致。虽然为解离症患者提供正念治疗的最佳实践仍不明确,但将选择点整合到 MBI 中可能符合创伤知情原则,并能有效对抗与创伤相关的自我代理能力丧失。在本文中,我们介绍了一项大型随机对照试验中的案例研究,研究对象是一名创伤后应激障碍-D 患者,该患者成功完成了为期 8 周的 MBI,同时在整个小组中表现出活跃的解离症状。对患者护理相关人员的后续访谈以及干预前后的评估表明,患者在正念训练中获得了积极的体验,自我调节能力也得到了改善。对案例研究的分析表明,由于在正念训练中融入了选择点并促进了结构安全,正念训练对这名患者来说可能是安全有效的。在此基础上,我们进一步讨论了促成该案例研究结果的六个影响因素,这些因素可以为临床医生、研究人员和希望为创伤后应激障碍-D 患者安全提供 MBIs 的指导人员提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating choice points into mindfulness training for the dissociative subtype of PTSD: A case report

Approximately 15–30 % of individuals diagnosed with PTSD experience high levels of dissociation, a condition categorized in the DSM-V as a dissociative subtype of PTSD (PTSD-D). Despite the rising number of studies supporting mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for the treatment of PTSD, literature on mindfulness and dissociation remains scarce and discording. While best practices for offering mindfulness for dissociative patients remain unclear, integrating choice points into MBIs may be aligned with trauma-informed principles and effective in countering loss of self-agency associated with trauma. In this article, we present a case study from a larger randomized controlled trial of an individual with PTSD-D who successfully completed an 8-week MBI while displaying active dissociation symptoms throughout the group. Follow-up interviews with stakeholders in the patient's care as well as pre-and post-intervention assessments indicate that the patient had a positive experience with the mindfulness training and improved self-regulation. Analysis of the case study suggests that the mindfulness training may have been safe and effective for this patient due to the integration of choice points throughout the mindfulness training and promotion of structural safety. We expand on this by further discussing six influencing factors that contributed to the outcome of the case study and can serve as a reference for clinicians, researchers, and instructors who wish to offer MBIs safely to patients with PTSD-D.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry research case reports
Psychiatry research case reports Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expanding the role of metoclopramide in Tardive Dyskinesia: A case report A unique case of iatrogenic hebephiliac behavior emerging late in life in a patient with Gordon Holmes Syndrome Esketamine-Induced acute transient psychotic episode in treatment-resistant depression: A case report Onset and exacerbation of first episode psychosis associated with cannabis withdrawal: A case series Clozapine induced globus pharyngeus: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1