Rapinpat Yodlorchai, Panrapee Suttiwan, Susan E Walch, Sakkaphat Ngamake
{"title":"泰国性少数群体的微肯定、微侵害和心理健康的条件过程分析。","authors":"Rapinpat Yodlorchai, Panrapee Suttiwan, Susan E Walch, Sakkaphat Ngamake","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2024.2328695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual orientation (SO) microaggressions contribute to mental health issues among sexual minorities. Microaffirmations may mitigate these effects, with internalized heterosexism and SO concealment proposed as mediators. A community sample of 307 Thai sexual minorities completed measures assessing SO microaggressions, microaffirmations, internalized heterosexism, SO concealment, and mental health concerns. Serial mediation analysis using Hayes' PROCESS macro model 6 tested indirect effects through proposed mediators. Conditional process analysis using PROCESS model 85 examined the moderating role of microaffirmations. These models tested hypothesized moderated serial mediation relationships among study variables. SO microaggressions had a total effect on mental health concerns, directly and indirectly through increased SO concealment. The internalized heterosexism → SO concealment sequence mediated this relationship. Microaffirmations moderated the direct microaggressions-mental health link, reducing this association at higher levels of microaffirmations. The full model accounted for 31.6% of the variance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.316) in mental health concerns. The Johnson-Neyman technique identified 0.613 as the microaffirmations value above which the effect of SO microaggressions on mental health was no longer significant. Findings elucidate mechanisms linking SO microaggressions to mental health issues and microaffirmations' protective role among Thai sexual minorities. These results could inform efforts to mitigate minority stress impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"653-680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Conditional Process Analysis of Microaffirmations, Microaggressions, and Mental Health Among Thai Sexual Minorities.\",\"authors\":\"Rapinpat Yodlorchai, Panrapee Suttiwan, Susan E Walch, Sakkaphat Ngamake\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2024.2328695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sexual orientation (SO) microaggressions contribute to mental health issues among sexual minorities. Microaffirmations may mitigate these effects, with internalized heterosexism and SO concealment proposed as mediators. A community sample of 307 Thai sexual minorities completed measures assessing SO microaggressions, microaffirmations, internalized heterosexism, SO concealment, and mental health concerns. Serial mediation analysis using Hayes' PROCESS macro model 6 tested indirect effects through proposed mediators. Conditional process analysis using PROCESS model 85 examined the moderating role of microaffirmations. These models tested hypothesized moderated serial mediation relationships among study variables. SO microaggressions had a total effect on mental health concerns, directly and indirectly through increased SO concealment. The internalized heterosexism → SO concealment sequence mediated this relationship. Microaffirmations moderated the direct microaggressions-mental health link, reducing this association at higher levels of microaffirmations. The full model accounted for 31.6% of the variance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.316) in mental health concerns. The Johnson-Neyman technique identified 0.613 as the microaffirmations value above which the effect of SO microaggressions on mental health was no longer significant. Findings elucidate mechanisms linking SO microaggressions to mental health issues and microaffirmations' protective role among Thai sexual minorities. These results could inform efforts to mitigate minority stress impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"653-680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2328695\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2328695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
性取向(SO)微侵害会导致性少数群体的心理健康问题。微肯定可能会减轻这些影响,而内化的异性恋主义和性取向掩饰则被认为是中介因素。一个由 307 名泰国性少数群体组成的社区样本完成了对微诽谤、微肯定、内化异性恋主义、微诽谤隐瞒和心理健康问题的评估。利用 Hayes 的 PROCESS 宏模型 6 进行了序列中介分析,检验了通过拟议中介产生的间接影响。使用 PROCESS 模型 85 进行的条件过程分析检验了微观肯定的调节作用。这些模型检验了研究变量之间假设的调节串行中介关系。社会性别微表达对心理健康问题有直接和间接的影响。内化的异性恋主义 → SO 隐藏序列对这种关系起到了中介作用。微肯定调节了微冒犯与心理健康之间的直接联系,在微肯定水平较高时,这种联系会减弱。完整模型解释了心理健康问题中 31.6% 的方差(R2 = 0.316)。约翰逊-奈曼(Johnson-Neyman)技术确定 0.613 为微肯定值,超过此值,社会责任微冒犯对心理健康的影响就不再显著。研究结果阐明了泰国性少数群体中社会性微侵害与心理健康问题之间的关联机制,以及微肯定对心理健康的保护作用。这些结果可以为减轻少数群体压力影响的工作提供参考。
A Conditional Process Analysis of Microaffirmations, Microaggressions, and Mental Health Among Thai Sexual Minorities.
Sexual orientation (SO) microaggressions contribute to mental health issues among sexual minorities. Microaffirmations may mitigate these effects, with internalized heterosexism and SO concealment proposed as mediators. A community sample of 307 Thai sexual minorities completed measures assessing SO microaggressions, microaffirmations, internalized heterosexism, SO concealment, and mental health concerns. Serial mediation analysis using Hayes' PROCESS macro model 6 tested indirect effects through proposed mediators. Conditional process analysis using PROCESS model 85 examined the moderating role of microaffirmations. These models tested hypothesized moderated serial mediation relationships among study variables. SO microaggressions had a total effect on mental health concerns, directly and indirectly through increased SO concealment. The internalized heterosexism → SO concealment sequence mediated this relationship. Microaffirmations moderated the direct microaggressions-mental health link, reducing this association at higher levels of microaffirmations. The full model accounted for 31.6% of the variance (R2 = 0.316) in mental health concerns. The Johnson-Neyman technique identified 0.613 as the microaffirmations value above which the effect of SO microaggressions on mental health was no longer significant. Findings elucidate mechanisms linking SO microaggressions to mental health issues and microaffirmations' protective role among Thai sexual minorities. These results could inform efforts to mitigate minority stress impacts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.