自交不会导致香蒲亲本或杂交种的近交抑郁

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Evolutionary Ecology Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s10682-024-10294-4
Danielle Rock, Amanda Whitehead, Kimberly Parno, Vikram Bhargav, Joanna Freeland, Marcel Dorken
{"title":"自交不会导致香蒲亲本或杂交种的近交抑郁","authors":"Danielle Rock, Amanda Whitehead, Kimberly Parno, Vikram Bhargav, Joanna Freeland, Marcel Dorken","doi":"10.1007/s10682-024-10294-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some of the most impactful invasive plants are hybrids that exhibit heterosis and outperform their parent species. Heterosis can result from multiple genetic processes, and may also be more likely when parental populations are inbred. However, although outcrossing between relatives and self-fertilization both occur in many widespread plants, no study to our knowledge has investigated whether inbreeding in parental populations could help to explain heterosis in hybrid plants that have displaced their parent species. In the wetlands of southeastern Canada there is a widespread <i>Typha</i> (cattail) hybrid zone in which native <i>T. latifolia</i> (broad-leafed cattail) interbreeds with introduced <i>T. angustifolia</i> (narrow-leafed cattail) to produce the invasive hybrid <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca</i>. <i>Typha</i> reproduce through self-fertilization, outcrossing, and clonal propagation. Heterosis has been identified in <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca</i> by comparing proxy fitness measures between hybrids and parent species, but these studies did not consider the potential importance of inbreeding in parental populations. Because F1 hybrids have higher heterozygosity than their parent species, the self-fertilized offspring of hybrids should have higher heterozygosity than the self-fertilized offspring of parent species; the latter should therefore be more inbred, and potentially more susceptible to inbreeding depression (ID). We tested the hypothesis that self-fertilization leads to greater ID in the offspring of <i>T. latifolia</i> and <i>T. angustifolia</i> compared to the offspring of F1 <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca.</i> We conducted common-garden and wetland experiments using seeds from hand-pollinated plants sourced from natural populations, and quantified several fitness-related metrics in the offspring of self-fertilized versus outcrossed parent species and hybrids. Our experiments provided no evidence that inbreeding leads to ID in self-fertilized <i>T. angustifolia, T. latifolia</i> or <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca</i> in either a common garden or a natural wetland, and thus show that heterosis in a widespread invasive hybrid does not rely on comparisons with inbred parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":55158,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Ecology","volume":"201 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-fertilization does not lead to inbreeding depression in Typha parent species or hybrids\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Rock, Amanda Whitehead, Kimberly Parno, Vikram Bhargav, Joanna Freeland, Marcel Dorken\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10682-024-10294-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Some of the most impactful invasive plants are hybrids that exhibit heterosis and outperform their parent species. Heterosis can result from multiple genetic processes, and may also be more likely when parental populations are inbred. However, although outcrossing between relatives and self-fertilization both occur in many widespread plants, no study to our knowledge has investigated whether inbreeding in parental populations could help to explain heterosis in hybrid plants that have displaced their parent species. In the wetlands of southeastern Canada there is a widespread <i>Typha</i> (cattail) hybrid zone in which native <i>T. latifolia</i> (broad-leafed cattail) interbreeds with introduced <i>T. angustifolia</i> (narrow-leafed cattail) to produce the invasive hybrid <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca</i>. <i>Typha</i> reproduce through self-fertilization, outcrossing, and clonal propagation. Heterosis has been identified in <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca</i> by comparing proxy fitness measures between hybrids and parent species, but these studies did not consider the potential importance of inbreeding in parental populations. Because F1 hybrids have higher heterozygosity than their parent species, the self-fertilized offspring of hybrids should have higher heterozygosity than the self-fertilized offspring of parent species; the latter should therefore be more inbred, and potentially more susceptible to inbreeding depression (ID). We tested the hypothesis that self-fertilization leads to greater ID in the offspring of <i>T. latifolia</i> and <i>T. angustifolia</i> compared to the offspring of F1 <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca.</i> We conducted common-garden and wetland experiments using seeds from hand-pollinated plants sourced from natural populations, and quantified several fitness-related metrics in the offspring of self-fertilized versus outcrossed parent species and hybrids. Our experiments provided no evidence that inbreeding leads to ID in self-fertilized <i>T. angustifolia, T. latifolia</i> or <i>T.</i> × <i>glauca</i> in either a common garden or a natural wetland, and thus show that heterosis in a widespread invasive hybrid does not rely on comparisons with inbred parents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Ecology\",\"volume\":\"201 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10294-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10294-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些最具影响力的入侵植物是杂交种,它们表现出杂交性,其表现优于亲本物种。杂交可由多种遗传过程造成,当亲本种群近亲繁殖时,杂交也更有可能发生。然而,尽管许多广布的植物都会发生亲缘植物间的杂交和自交,但据我们所知,还没有研究表明亲本种群中的近交是否有助于解释取代其亲本物种的杂交植物的异交现象。在加拿大东南部的湿地,有一个广泛的香蒲(Typha)杂交区,其中本地的 T. latifolia(阔叶香蒲)与引进的 T. angustifolia(窄叶香蒲)杂交,产生了入侵性杂交种 T. × glauca。香蒲通过自交、外交和克隆繁殖进行繁殖。通过比较杂交种和亲本之间的代用适合度,发现了 T. × glauca 的异质性,但这些研究并未考虑亲本种群近亲繁殖的潜在重要性。由于 F1 代杂交种的杂合度高于其亲本,因此杂交种的自交后代的杂合度应高于亲本的自交后代;因此后者的近交程度更高,可能更容易受到近交抑郁(ID)的影响。与 F1 T. × glauca 的后代相比,自交会导致 T. latifolia 和 T. angustifolia 的后代出现更大的近交抑郁。我们使用来自自然种群的人工授粉植物种子进行了普通花园和湿地实验,并量化了自交与外交亲本和杂交后代的几项适应性相关指标。我们的实验没有提供证据表明,在普通花园或自然湿地中,近亲繁殖会导致自交的T. angustifolia、T. latifolia或T.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-fertilization does not lead to inbreeding depression in Typha parent species or hybrids

Some of the most impactful invasive plants are hybrids that exhibit heterosis and outperform their parent species. Heterosis can result from multiple genetic processes, and may also be more likely when parental populations are inbred. However, although outcrossing between relatives and self-fertilization both occur in many widespread plants, no study to our knowledge has investigated whether inbreeding in parental populations could help to explain heterosis in hybrid plants that have displaced their parent species. In the wetlands of southeastern Canada there is a widespread Typha (cattail) hybrid zone in which native T. latifolia (broad-leafed cattail) interbreeds with introduced T. angustifolia (narrow-leafed cattail) to produce the invasive hybrid T. × glauca. Typha reproduce through self-fertilization, outcrossing, and clonal propagation. Heterosis has been identified in T. × glauca by comparing proxy fitness measures between hybrids and parent species, but these studies did not consider the potential importance of inbreeding in parental populations. Because F1 hybrids have higher heterozygosity than their parent species, the self-fertilized offspring of hybrids should have higher heterozygosity than the self-fertilized offspring of parent species; the latter should therefore be more inbred, and potentially more susceptible to inbreeding depression (ID). We tested the hypothesis that self-fertilization leads to greater ID in the offspring of T. latifolia and T. angustifolia compared to the offspring of F1 T. × glauca. We conducted common-garden and wetland experiments using seeds from hand-pollinated plants sourced from natural populations, and quantified several fitness-related metrics in the offspring of self-fertilized versus outcrossed parent species and hybrids. Our experiments provided no evidence that inbreeding leads to ID in self-fertilized T. angustifolia, T. latifolia or T. × glauca in either a common garden or a natural wetland, and thus show that heterosis in a widespread invasive hybrid does not rely on comparisons with inbred parents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Ecology
Evolutionary Ecology 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Ecology is a concept-oriented journal of biological research at the interface of ecology and evolution. We publish papers that therefore integrate both fields of research: research that seeks to explain the ecology of organisms in the context of evolution, or patterns of evolution as explained by ecological processes. The journal publishes original research and discussion concerning the evolutionary ecology of organisms. These may include papers addressing evolutionary aspects of population ecology, organismal interactions and coevolution, behaviour, life histories, communication, morphology, host-parasite interactions and disease ecology, as well as ecological aspects of genetic processes. The objective is to promote the conceptual, theoretical and empirical development of ecology and evolutionary biology; the scope extends to any organism or system. In additional to Original Research articles, we publish Review articles that survey recent developments in the field of evolutionary ecology; Ideas & Perspectives articles which present new points of view and novel hypotheses; and Comments on articles recently published in Evolutionary Ecology or elsewhere. We also welcome New Tests of Existing Ideas - testing well-established hypotheses but with broader data or more methodologically rigorous approaches; - and shorter Natural History Notes, which aim to present new observations of organismal biology in the wild that may provide inspiration for future research. As of 2018, we now also invite Methods papers, to present or review new theoretical, practical or analytical methods used in evolutionary ecology. Students & Early Career Researchers: We particularly encourage, and offer incentives for, submission of Reviews, Ideas & Perspectives, and Methods papers by students and early-career researchers (defined as being within one year of award of a PhD degree) – see Students & Early Career Researchers
期刊最新文献
Novel and classical methods similarly describe variation in territory size among males in Neotropical poison frogs with contrasting reproductive and behavioral strategies Do past and present abiotic conditions explain variation in the nutritional quality of wildflower pollens for bees? History matters: evolutionary and demographic reconstruction of the Southwest Atlantic loggerheads (Testudinata: Cheloniidae) Intraspecies variation in cytoplasmic incompatibility intensity in the bean beetle Callosobruchus analis Geographic body size variation of a Plateau anuran: evidence supporting the water availability and hibernation hypotheses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1