更好还是不同?社会群体的模仿如何影响消费者对差异化品牌的偏好

IF 4 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Brand Management Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1057/s41262-024-00354-z
{"title":"更好还是不同?社会群体的模仿如何影响消费者对差异化品牌的偏好","authors":"","doi":"10.1057/s41262-024-00354-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Consumers tend to abandon or avoid using a product when they become aware that it is being imitated by others. However, little is known about how or why such reactions may vary based on whether the mimicker belongs to the consumers’ dissociative group or membership group. This study proposes that consumers respond to mimickers from different social groups through the use of brands: horizontal or vertical differentiation. Across five studies, we show that when consumers are mimicked by a dissociative group (membership group), it results in feelings of self-identity threat (distinctiveness-threat). This, in turn, increases their desire for self-expression (a higher status position among brand users) and subsequently heightens the preference for horizontal (vertical) brands. These effects are mitigated when the mimicry domain has low identity-relevance and when the imitated person feels powerful.</p>","PeriodicalId":48109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Brand Management","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better or different? How mimicry by social groups shapes consumers’ preference for differentiated brands\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41262-024-00354-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Consumers tend to abandon or avoid using a product when they become aware that it is being imitated by others. However, little is known about how or why such reactions may vary based on whether the mimicker belongs to the consumers’ dissociative group or membership group. This study proposes that consumers respond to mimickers from different social groups through the use of brands: horizontal or vertical differentiation. Across five studies, we show that when consumers are mimicked by a dissociative group (membership group), it results in feelings of self-identity threat (distinctiveness-threat). This, in turn, increases their desire for self-expression (a higher status position among brand users) and subsequently heightens the preference for horizontal (vertical) brands. These effects are mitigated when the mimicry domain has low identity-relevance and when the imitated person feels powerful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Brand Management\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Brand Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-024-00354-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-024-00354-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 当消费者意识到某种产品被他人模仿时,他们往往会放弃或避免使用该产品。然而,人们对这种反应如何或为何会因模仿者是否属于消费者的分离群体或成员群体而有所不同知之甚少。本研究提出,消费者通过使用品牌对来自不同社会群体的模仿者做出反应:横向或纵向差异化。通过五项研究,我们发现,当消费者被一个分离群体(成员群体)模仿时,会产生自我认同威胁感(独特性威胁)。这反过来又增加了他们自我表现的欲望(在品牌用户中获得更高的地位),从而提高了对横向(纵向)品牌的偏好。当模仿领域的身份相关性较低,且被模仿者感觉自己很强大时,这些影响就会减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Better or different? How mimicry by social groups shapes consumers’ preference for differentiated brands

Abstract

Consumers tend to abandon or avoid using a product when they become aware that it is being imitated by others. However, little is known about how or why such reactions may vary based on whether the mimicker belongs to the consumers’ dissociative group or membership group. This study proposes that consumers respond to mimickers from different social groups through the use of brands: horizontal or vertical differentiation. Across five studies, we show that when consumers are mimicked by a dissociative group (membership group), it results in feelings of self-identity threat (distinctiveness-threat). This, in turn, increases their desire for self-expression (a higher status position among brand users) and subsequently heightens the preference for horizontal (vertical) brands. These effects are mitigated when the mimicry domain has low identity-relevance and when the imitated person feels powerful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original and insightful peer-reviewed articles as well as industry-based case studies plus invited expert commentaries and editorials which rigorously consider:models and theories effectively used in brand management research and practicehow the world's leading companies are managing their brandsthe latest thinking techniques and initiatives used by agencies and consultantscurrent case studies which explore leading organisations' practical experiences the problems faced and the lessons learnedapplied research from leading business schools research institutes and universitiesIf after reading the aims and scope you consider your article potentially relevant you may submit your work?for consideration as per the?normal process. The Journal Editors do not ordinarily discuss potential suitability of articles prior to submission.The Journal also regularly publishes themed special issues and is essential reading for brand strategists in both private and public sector organisations and academics in universities and business schools - including:Professors and LecturersMaster MBA and PhD studentsBrand ResearchersMarketing and Branding ConsultantsHeads of Branding Brand Directors and ManagersMarketing DirectorsBusiness Development ManagersHeads of Corporate CommunicationsCEOs and Managing DirectorsAgency DirectorsPlanning Directors and Strategic PlannersIP Lawyers and Patent AttorneysTopics covered include but are not limited to:Online or Digital BrandingBrand Metrics and/or AnalyticsLuxury BrandingBrand Ethics and/or Corporate Social ResponsibilityBrand and Finance Brand Reputation Identity and ImageBrand Relationship Loyalty or LoveBranding and TechnologyBranding Innovation and/or R&DBrand Valuation Integrated Brand CommunicationBrand ManagementBrand EquityBrand Community (Online)Product BrandingService BrandingBusiness-to-Business BrandingRetail BrandingPrivate Label Branding Brand Heritage and History Qualitative and Quantitative Brand ResearchBrand Architecture and PortfoliosBrand Alliances and MergersCorporate Brand ManagementBrand ExperienceBrand CrisesBrand CounterfeitsBrand and LawBrand Extension and Brand Growth Brand Credibility and TrustOpen Brand ManagementBrand Elements (Logo Naming Packaging etc.)Branding for Profit and Non-Profit OrganisationsBrand Co-creation Brand Research Methods
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effect of incidental priming when measuring trademark genericism When brand cynicism turns into brand hate: the mediating role of brand hate on the relationship between brand cynicism and negative WOM Redefining brand identity and internal communications in turbulent times: the case of Banco Sabadell Act your age to engage: field evidence on parent versus brand extension Using value co-creation behavior as a mediator to explore the influence of virtual tourism community characteristics on destination brand equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1