多渠道关系传播战略:一刀切战略适合所有客户吗?

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS European Journal of Marketing Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1108/ejm-10-2022-0717
Carla Ramos, Adriana Bruscato Bortoluzzo, Danny P. Claro
{"title":"多渠道关系传播战略:一刀切战略适合所有客户吗?","authors":"Carla Ramos, Adriana Bruscato Bortoluzzo, Danny P. Claro","doi":"10.1108/ejm-10-2022-0717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to capture how the association between a multichannel relational communication strategy (MRCS) and customer performance is contingent upon such customer performance (low- versus high-performance customers) and to reconcile past contradictory results in this marketing-related topic. To this end, the authors propose and validate the method of quantile regression as an unconventional, yet effective, means to proceed to that reconciliation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study collected data from 4,934 customers of a private pension fund firm and accounted for both firm- and customer-initiated relational communication channels (RCCs) and for customer lifetime value (CLV). This study estimated a generalized linear model and then a quantile regression model was used to account for customer performance heterogeneity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study finds that specific RCCs present different levels of association with performance for low- versus high-performance customers, where outcome customer performance is the dependent variable. For example, the relation between firm-initiated communication (FIC) and performance is stronger for low-CLV customers, whereas the relation between customer-initiated communication (CIC) and performance is increasingly stronger for high-CLV customers but not for low-CLV ones. This study also finds that combining different forms of FIC can result in a negative association with customer performance, especially for low-CLV customers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The authors tested the conceptual model in one single firm in the specific context of financial services and with cross-sectional data, so there should be caution when extrapolating this study’s findings.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study offers nuanced and precise managerial insights on recommended resource allocation along with relational communication efforts, showing how managers can benefit from adopting a differentiated-customer performance approach when designing their MRCS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study provides an overview of the state of the art of MRCS, proposes a contingency analysis of the relationship between MRCS and performance based on customer performance heterogeneity and suggests the quantile method to perform such analysis and help reconcile past contradictory findings. This study shows how the association between RCCs and CLV varies across the conditional quantiles of the distribution of customer performance. This study also addresses a recent call for a more holistic perspective on the relationships between independent and dependent variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48401,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multichannel relational communication strategy: does one-sized strategy fit all customers?\",\"authors\":\"Carla Ramos, Adriana Bruscato Bortoluzzo, Danny P. Claro\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ejm-10-2022-0717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to capture how the association between a multichannel relational communication strategy (MRCS) and customer performance is contingent upon such customer performance (low- versus high-performance customers) and to reconcile past contradictory results in this marketing-related topic. To this end, the authors propose and validate the method of quantile regression as an unconventional, yet effective, means to proceed to that reconciliation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study collected data from 4,934 customers of a private pension fund firm and accounted for both firm- and customer-initiated relational communication channels (RCCs) and for customer lifetime value (CLV). This study estimated a generalized linear model and then a quantile regression model was used to account for customer performance heterogeneity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>This study finds that specific RCCs present different levels of association with performance for low- versus high-performance customers, where outcome customer performance is the dependent variable. For example, the relation between firm-initiated communication (FIC) and performance is stronger for low-CLV customers, whereas the relation between customer-initiated communication (CIC) and performance is increasingly stronger for high-CLV customers but not for low-CLV ones. This study also finds that combining different forms of FIC can result in a negative association with customer performance, especially for low-CLV customers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The authors tested the conceptual model in one single firm in the specific context of financial services and with cross-sectional data, so there should be caution when extrapolating this study’s findings.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This study offers nuanced and precise managerial insights on recommended resource allocation along with relational communication efforts, showing how managers can benefit from adopting a differentiated-customer performance approach when designing their MRCS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study provides an overview of the state of the art of MRCS, proposes a contingency analysis of the relationship between MRCS and performance based on customer performance heterogeneity and suggests the quantile method to perform such analysis and help reconcile past contradictory findings. This study shows how the association between RCCs and CLV varies across the conditional quantiles of the distribution of customer performance. This study also addresses a recent call for a more holistic perspective on the relationships between independent and dependent variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2022-0717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2022-0717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在捕捉多渠道关系沟通策略(MRCS)与客户绩效之间的关联如何取决于客户绩效(低绩效客户与高绩效客户),并调和过去在这一营销相关主题上的矛盾结果。为此,作者提出并验证了量子回归方法,将其作为一种非常规但有效的方法来进行调和。本研究收集了一家私人养老基金公司 4934 名客户的数据,并考虑了公司和客户发起的关系沟通渠道(RCC)以及客户终身价值(CLV)。本研究估计了一个广义线性模型,然后使用一个量子回归模型来解释客户绩效的异质性。研究结果本研究发现,在以结果客户绩效为因变量的情况下,特定的 RCC 与低绩效客户和高绩效客户的绩效存在不同程度的关联。例如,企业主动沟通(FIC)与低客户忠诚度(CLV)客户的绩效之间的关系更强,而客户主动沟通(CIC)与高客户忠诚度(CLV)客户的绩效之间的关系越来越强,但与低客户忠诚度(CLV)客户的关系不强。本研究还发现,将不同形式的 FIC 结合在一起会导致与客户绩效的负相关,尤其是对低 CLV 客户而言。研究局限/启示作者在金融服务的特定背景下,使用横截面数据在一家公司测试了概念模型,因此在推断本研究的结论时应谨慎。原创性/价值本研究概述了 MRCS 的研究现状,提出了基于客户绩效异质性的 MRCS 与绩效之间关系的权变分析,并建议使用量化方法进行此类分析,以帮助调和过去相互矛盾的研究结果。本研究显示了 RCC 与 CLV 之间的关联在客户绩效分布的条件量级上有何不同。本研究还回应了最近关于从更全面的角度看待自变量和因变量之间关系的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multichannel relational communication strategy: does one-sized strategy fit all customers?

Purpose

This study aims to capture how the association between a multichannel relational communication strategy (MRCS) and customer performance is contingent upon such customer performance (low- versus high-performance customers) and to reconcile past contradictory results in this marketing-related topic. To this end, the authors propose and validate the method of quantile regression as an unconventional, yet effective, means to proceed to that reconciliation.

Design/methodology/approach

This study collected data from 4,934 customers of a private pension fund firm and accounted for both firm- and customer-initiated relational communication channels (RCCs) and for customer lifetime value (CLV). This study estimated a generalized linear model and then a quantile regression model was used to account for customer performance heterogeneity.

Findings

This study finds that specific RCCs present different levels of association with performance for low- versus high-performance customers, where outcome customer performance is the dependent variable. For example, the relation between firm-initiated communication (FIC) and performance is stronger for low-CLV customers, whereas the relation between customer-initiated communication (CIC) and performance is increasingly stronger for high-CLV customers but not for low-CLV ones. This study also finds that combining different forms of FIC can result in a negative association with customer performance, especially for low-CLV customers.

Research limitations/implications

The authors tested the conceptual model in one single firm in the specific context of financial services and with cross-sectional data, so there should be caution when extrapolating this study’s findings.

Practical implications

This study offers nuanced and precise managerial insights on recommended resource allocation along with relational communication efforts, showing how managers can benefit from adopting a differentiated-customer performance approach when designing their MRCS.

Originality/value

This study provides an overview of the state of the art of MRCS, proposes a contingency analysis of the relationship between MRCS and performance based on customer performance heterogeneity and suggests the quantile method to perform such analysis and help reconcile past contradictory findings. This study shows how the association between RCCs and CLV varies across the conditional quantiles of the distribution of customer performance. This study also addresses a recent call for a more holistic perspective on the relationships between independent and dependent variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: The EJM is receptive to all areas of research which are relevant to marketing academic research, some examples are: ■Sustainability and ethical issues in marketing ■Consumer behaviour ■Advertising and branding issues ■Sales management and personal selling ■Methodology and metatheory of marketing research ■International and export marketing ■Services marketing ■New product development and innovation ■Retailing and distribution ■Macromarketing and societal issues ■Pricing and economic decision making in marketing ■Marketing models
期刊最新文献
Refocusing marketing effort to support net-positive social impact Naming product colors by consumption situations as advertising appeals: effects and the underlying mechanism Applying the theory of consumption values to representational and nonrepresentational images in marketing: propositions and research directions A second life for second-hand products: the role of anthropomorphism and taboo trade-offs Strategizing green marketing in times of uncertainty: does it pay off?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1