对西班牙中心的小肠胶囊内镜检查进行全面检查,以达到欧洲消化内镜学会的标准。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-03-07 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2252-8946
Míriam Gómez Villagrá, César Prieto de Frías, Diego Martinez-Acitores de la Mata, Maite Alonso-Sierra, Noelia Alonso-Lazaro, Noemí Caballero, Francisco Sanchez Ceballos, Luis Compañy, Juan Egea Valenzuela, Pilar Esteban, Sergio Farráis, Ignacio Fernández-Urién, Consuelo Galvez, Almudena García, Javier García Lledó, Begoña González Suárez, Victoria-Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marisol Lujan-Sanchís, Beatriz Mateos Muñoz, Cristina Romero-Mascarell, Mileidis San Juan Acosta, Eduardo Valdivielso Cortázar, Antonio Giordano, Cristina Carretero
{"title":"对西班牙中心的小肠胶囊内镜检查进行全面检查,以达到欧洲消化内镜学会的标准。","authors":"Míriam Gómez Villagrá, César Prieto de Frías, Diego Martinez-Acitores de la Mata, Maite Alonso-Sierra, Noelia Alonso-Lazaro, Noemí Caballero, Francisco Sanchez Ceballos, Luis Compañy, Juan Egea Valenzuela, Pilar Esteban, Sergio Farráis, Ignacio Fernández-Urién, Consuelo Galvez, Almudena García, Javier García Lledó, Begoña González Suárez, Victoria-Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marisol Lujan-Sanchís, Beatriz Mateos Muñoz, Cristina Romero-Mascarell, Mileidis San Juan Acosta, Eduardo Valdivielso Cortázar, Antonio Giordano, Cristina Carretero","doi":"10.1055/a-2252-8946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> In 2019, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) created a working group to develop technical and quality standards for small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) to improve the daily practice of endoscopy services. They developed 10 quality parameters, which have yet to be tested in a real-life setting. Our study aimed to evaluate the accomplishment of the quality standards in SBCE established by the ESGE in several Spanish centers. <b>Materials and methods</b> An online survey of 11 multiple-choice questions related to the ESGE performance measures was sent to Spanish centers with experience in SBCE. In order to participate and obtain reliable data, at least 100 questionnaires had to be answered per center because that is the minimum number established by ESGE. <b>Results</b> 20 centers participated in the study, compiling 2049 SBCEs for the analysis. Only one of 10 performance measures (cecal visualization) reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE. In five of 10 performance measures (Indication, lesion detection rate, terminology, and retention rate) the minimum standard was nearly achieved. <b>Conclusions</b> Our study is the first multicenter study regarding SBCE quality performance measures in a real setting. Our results show that the minimum standard is hardly reached in most procedures, which calls into question their clinical applicability in real life. We suggest performing similar studies in other countries to evaluate whether there is a need for quality improvement programs or a need to reevaluate the minimum and target values published so far.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"E344-E351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10932730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive examination of small-bowel capsule endoscopy in Spanish centers to meet European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards.\",\"authors\":\"Míriam Gómez Villagrá, César Prieto de Frías, Diego Martinez-Acitores de la Mata, Maite Alonso-Sierra, Noelia Alonso-Lazaro, Noemí Caballero, Francisco Sanchez Ceballos, Luis Compañy, Juan Egea Valenzuela, Pilar Esteban, Sergio Farráis, Ignacio Fernández-Urién, Consuelo Galvez, Almudena García, Javier García Lledó, Begoña González Suárez, Victoria-Alejandra Jiménez-García, Marisol Lujan-Sanchís, Beatriz Mateos Muñoz, Cristina Romero-Mascarell, Mileidis San Juan Acosta, Eduardo Valdivielso Cortázar, Antonio Giordano, Cristina Carretero\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2252-8946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> In 2019, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) created a working group to develop technical and quality standards for small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) to improve the daily practice of endoscopy services. They developed 10 quality parameters, which have yet to be tested in a real-life setting. Our study aimed to evaluate the accomplishment of the quality standards in SBCE established by the ESGE in several Spanish centers. <b>Materials and methods</b> An online survey of 11 multiple-choice questions related to the ESGE performance measures was sent to Spanish centers with experience in SBCE. In order to participate and obtain reliable data, at least 100 questionnaires had to be answered per center because that is the minimum number established by ESGE. <b>Results</b> 20 centers participated in the study, compiling 2049 SBCEs for the analysis. Only one of 10 performance measures (cecal visualization) reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE. In five of 10 performance measures (Indication, lesion detection rate, terminology, and retention rate) the minimum standard was nearly achieved. <b>Conclusions</b> Our study is the first multicenter study regarding SBCE quality performance measures in a real setting. Our results show that the minimum standard is hardly reached in most procedures, which calls into question their clinical applicability in real life. We suggest performing similar studies in other countries to evaluate whether there is a need for quality improvement programs or a need to reevaluate the minimum and target values published so far.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"E344-E351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10932730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2252-8946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2252-8946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 2019 年,欧洲消化内镜学会(ESGE)成立了一个工作组,负责制定小肠胶囊内镜(SBCE)的技术和质量标准,以改善内镜服务的日常实践。他们制定了 10 项质量参数,但尚未在实际环境中进行测试。我们的研究旨在评估 ESGE 制定的 SBCE 质量标准在几个西班牙中心的执行情况。材料和方法 我们向具有 SBCE 经验的西班牙中心发送了一份在线调查,调查内容包括 11 道与 ESGE 性能衡量标准相关的多项选择题。为了参与并获得可靠的数据,每个中心必须至少回答 100 份问卷,因为这是 ESGE 规定的最低数量。结果 20 家中心参与了研究,共收集了 2049 份 SBCE 供分析之用。在 10 项绩效指标中,只有一项(盲肠显像)达到了 ESGE 规定的最低标准。在 10 项性能指标中,有 5 项(适应症、病变检出率、术语和保留率)几乎达到了最低标准。结论 我们的研究是首次在实际环境中就 SBCE 质量性能指标进行的多中心研究。我们的研究结果表明,大多数手术几乎都没有达到最低标准,这使我们对其在现实生活中的临床适用性产生了怀疑。我们建议在其他国家开展类似的研究,以评估是否有必要实施质量改进计划或重新评估迄今为止公布的最低值和目标值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comprehensive examination of small-bowel capsule endoscopy in Spanish centers to meet European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards.

Background and study aims In 2019, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) created a working group to develop technical and quality standards for small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) to improve the daily practice of endoscopy services. They developed 10 quality parameters, which have yet to be tested in a real-life setting. Our study aimed to evaluate the accomplishment of the quality standards in SBCE established by the ESGE in several Spanish centers. Materials and methods An online survey of 11 multiple-choice questions related to the ESGE performance measures was sent to Spanish centers with experience in SBCE. In order to participate and obtain reliable data, at least 100 questionnaires had to be answered per center because that is the minimum number established by ESGE. Results 20 centers participated in the study, compiling 2049 SBCEs for the analysis. Only one of 10 performance measures (cecal visualization) reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE. In five of 10 performance measures (Indication, lesion detection rate, terminology, and retention rate) the minimum standard was nearly achieved. Conclusions Our study is the first multicenter study regarding SBCE quality performance measures in a real setting. Our results show that the minimum standard is hardly reached in most procedures, which calls into question their clinical applicability in real life. We suggest performing similar studies in other countries to evaluate whether there is a need for quality improvement programs or a need to reevaluate the minimum and target values published so far.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1