年轻人的健康差异:直接比较不同癌症中心的压力和未满足的需求。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1200/CCI.23.00218
Haley S Markwardt, Sarah E Taghavi, Deborah Z Shear, Peyton R McDuffee, Emily J Smith, Alexandra M Dunker, Mary M Wilson, Janae A Russell, Molin Shi, Brittany C Hall
{"title":"年轻人的健康差异:直接比较不同癌症中心的压力和未满足的需求。","authors":"Haley S Markwardt, Sarah E Taghavi, Deborah Z Shear, Peyton R McDuffee, Emily J Smith, Alexandra M Dunker, Mary M Wilson, Janae A Russell, Molin Shi, Brittany C Hall","doi":"10.1200/CCI.23.00218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information on concerns that young adults (YAs) with cancer face when receiving care outside of specialized treatment centers is needed to increase equitable care to YAs at greater risk of marginalization by the health care system. The current study compared distress and unmet needs at the time of clinic visit between YAs receiving care from three different cancer clinics: (1) a National Cancer Institute-designated center, (2) a community-based clinic, and (3) a county hospital outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool (AYA-POST) was administered to measure distress and cancer-related concerns of YAs in active treatment. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared distress scores by treatment site. A Fisher's exact test compared the number of participants endorsing each item on the Needs Assessment Checklist from each site. A simple linear regression determined the association between distress and number of items endorsed on the Needs Assessment Checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven participants completed the AYA-POST, endorsing, on average, 11 concerns. Fisher's exact test showed significant differences between sites in the proportion of participants endorsing eight items: boredom (<i>P</i> < .001), eating/appetite (<i>P</i> < .001), nausea/vomiting (<i>P</i> < .001), financial concern (<i>P</i> = .002), hopelessness/helplessness (<i>P</i> = .03), confidentiality (<i>P</i> = .04), sibling concern (<i>P</i> = .04), and insurance (<i>P</i> = .05). The simple linear regression model was significant (F(1, 94) = 39.772, <i>P</i> < .001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.297), indicating the number of unmet needs accounted for almost 30% of the variance in distress. The one-way ANOVA was not significant (F(2, 93) = 1.34, <i>P</i> = .267).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social determinants of health can influence the number and type of unmet needs experienced, affecting distress and other outcomes and underscoring the importance of timely, effective, age-appropriate screening and intervention for distress and unmet needs in YAs with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2300218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Disparities in Young Adults: A Direct Comparison of Distress and Unmet Needs Across Cancer Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Haley S Markwardt, Sarah E Taghavi, Deborah Z Shear, Peyton R McDuffee, Emily J Smith, Alexandra M Dunker, Mary M Wilson, Janae A Russell, Molin Shi, Brittany C Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI.23.00218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information on concerns that young adults (YAs) with cancer face when receiving care outside of specialized treatment centers is needed to increase equitable care to YAs at greater risk of marginalization by the health care system. The current study compared distress and unmet needs at the time of clinic visit between YAs receiving care from three different cancer clinics: (1) a National Cancer Institute-designated center, (2) a community-based clinic, and (3) a county hospital outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool (AYA-POST) was administered to measure distress and cancer-related concerns of YAs in active treatment. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared distress scores by treatment site. A Fisher's exact test compared the number of participants endorsing each item on the Needs Assessment Checklist from each site. A simple linear regression determined the association between distress and number of items endorsed on the Needs Assessment Checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven participants completed the AYA-POST, endorsing, on average, 11 concerns. Fisher's exact test showed significant differences between sites in the proportion of participants endorsing eight items: boredom (<i>P</i> < .001), eating/appetite (<i>P</i> < .001), nausea/vomiting (<i>P</i> < .001), financial concern (<i>P</i> = .002), hopelessness/helplessness (<i>P</i> = .03), confidentiality (<i>P</i> = .04), sibling concern (<i>P</i> = .04), and insurance (<i>P</i> = .05). The simple linear regression model was significant (F(1, 94) = 39.772, <i>P</i> < .001, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.297), indicating the number of unmet needs accounted for almost 30% of the variance in distress. The one-way ANOVA was not significant (F(2, 93) = 1.34, <i>P</i> = .267).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social determinants of health can influence the number and type of unmet needs experienced, affecting distress and other outcomes and underscoring the importance of timely, effective, age-appropriate screening and intervention for distress and unmet needs in YAs with cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2300218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们需要了解患有癌症的年轻成人(YAs)在接受专业治疗中心以外的治疗时所面临的问题,以提高医疗保健系统对面临更大边缘化风险的 YAs 的公平治疗。本研究比较了在以下三家不同癌症诊所接受治疗的青年患者在就诊时所面临的困扰和未满足的需求:(1) 一家国家癌症研究所指定的中心,(2) 一家社区诊所,(3) 一家县医院门诊诊所:方法:采用青少年和青年肿瘤心理筛查工具(AYA-POST)来测量正在接受治疗的青年的痛苦和与癌症相关的问题。通过单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较了不同治疗地点的困扰得分。费雪精确检验比较了各治疗点认可需求评估清单中每个项目的参与者人数。简单线性回归确定了痛苦与需求评估核对表中认可项目数之间的关系:结果:97 名参与者完成了 AYA-POST 项目,平均赞同 11 个问题。费舍尔精确检验显示,在以下八个项目上,不同地点的参与者比例存在显著差异:无聊(P < .001)、吃饭/胃口(P < .001)、恶心/呕吐(P < .001)、经济问题(P = .002)、绝望/无助(P = .03)、保密(P = .04)、兄弟姐妹的担忧(P = .04)和保险(P = .05)。简单线性回归模型具有显著性(F(1, 94) = 39.772, P < .001, R2 = 0.297),表明未满足需求的数量几乎占到困扰变异的 30%。单因素方差分析结果不显著(F(2, 93) = 1.34, P = .267):结论:健康的社会决定因素会影响未满足需求的数量和类型,从而影响痛苦和其他结果,并强调了及时、有效、适龄筛查和干预癌症青少年痛苦和未满足需求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Disparities in Young Adults: A Direct Comparison of Distress and Unmet Needs Across Cancer Centers.

Purpose: Information on concerns that young adults (YAs) with cancer face when receiving care outside of specialized treatment centers is needed to increase equitable care to YAs at greater risk of marginalization by the health care system. The current study compared distress and unmet needs at the time of clinic visit between YAs receiving care from three different cancer clinics: (1) a National Cancer Institute-designated center, (2) a community-based clinic, and (3) a county hospital outpatient clinic.

Methods: The Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool (AYA-POST) was administered to measure distress and cancer-related concerns of YAs in active treatment. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared distress scores by treatment site. A Fisher's exact test compared the number of participants endorsing each item on the Needs Assessment Checklist from each site. A simple linear regression determined the association between distress and number of items endorsed on the Needs Assessment Checklist.

Results: Ninety-seven participants completed the AYA-POST, endorsing, on average, 11 concerns. Fisher's exact test showed significant differences between sites in the proportion of participants endorsing eight items: boredom (P < .001), eating/appetite (P < .001), nausea/vomiting (P < .001), financial concern (P = .002), hopelessness/helplessness (P = .03), confidentiality (P = .04), sibling concern (P = .04), and insurance (P = .05). The simple linear regression model was significant (F(1, 94) = 39.772, P < .001, R2 = 0.297), indicating the number of unmet needs accounted for almost 30% of the variance in distress. The one-way ANOVA was not significant (F(2, 93) = 1.34, P = .267).

Conclusion: Social determinants of health can influence the number and type of unmet needs experienced, affecting distress and other outcomes and underscoring the importance of timely, effective, age-appropriate screening and intervention for distress and unmet needs in YAs with cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
期刊最新文献
Development, Validation, and Clinical Utility of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure-Enhanced Prediction Models for Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy. Metastatic Versus Localized Disease as Inclusion Criteria That Can Be Automatically Extracted From Randomized Controlled Trials Using Natural Language Processing. Identifying Oncology Patients at High Risk for Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Visits Using a Novel Definition. Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Risk Prediction Model Development to Support Cancer Care Delivery: A Scoping Review. Optimizing End Points for Phase III Cancer Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1