斯洛文尼亚公共医疗系统中的植入前基因检测。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics Pub Date : 2024-03-12 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/bjmg-2023-0017
M Volk, K Writzl, A Veble, H Jaklič, N Teran, B Prosenc, M Štimpfel, I Virant Klun, E Vrtačnik Bokal, H Ban Frangež, B Peterlin
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚公共医疗系统中的植入前基因检测。","authors":"M Volk, K Writzl, A Veble, H Jaklič, N Teran, B Prosenc, M Štimpfel, I Virant Klun, E Vrtačnik Bokal, H Ban Frangež, B Peterlin","doi":"10.2478/bjmg-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is the earliest form of prenatal diagnosis that has become an established procedure for couples at risk of passing a severe genetic disease to their offspring. At UMC Ljubljana, we conducted a retrospective register-based study to present 15 years of PGT service within the public healthcare system in Slovenia. We collected the data of the PGT cycles from 2004 to 2019 and compared clinical outcomes for chromosomal and monogenic diseases using different embryo biopsy and testing approaches. In addition, we assessed the extent to which PGT has become the preferred option compared to classic prenatal diagnostics. We treated 211 couples, 110 with single gene disorder, 88 with structural chromosome rearrangement and 13 for numerical chromosome aberration. There were 375 PGT cycles with oocyte retrieval, while embryo transfer was possible in 263 cases resulting in 78 deliveries and 84 children. Altogether, the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 31% in 2004-2016 (blastomere biopsy) and 43% in 2017-19 (blastocyst biopsy), respectively. We assessed that approximately a third of couples would opt for PGT, while the rest preferred natural conception with prenatal diagnosis. Our results show that providing a PGT service within the public healthcare system has become a considerable option in pregnancy planning for couples at risk of transmitting a severe genetic disease to their offspring. In Slovenia, approximately a third of couples would opt for PGT. Although the number of cycles is small, our clinical results are comparable to larger centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":55403,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10932602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation Genetic Testing within the Public Healthcare System in Slovenia.\",\"authors\":\"M Volk, K Writzl, A Veble, H Jaklič, N Teran, B Prosenc, M Štimpfel, I Virant Klun, E Vrtačnik Bokal, H Ban Frangež, B Peterlin\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/bjmg-2023-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is the earliest form of prenatal diagnosis that has become an established procedure for couples at risk of passing a severe genetic disease to their offspring. At UMC Ljubljana, we conducted a retrospective register-based study to present 15 years of PGT service within the public healthcare system in Slovenia. We collected the data of the PGT cycles from 2004 to 2019 and compared clinical outcomes for chromosomal and monogenic diseases using different embryo biopsy and testing approaches. In addition, we assessed the extent to which PGT has become the preferred option compared to classic prenatal diagnostics. We treated 211 couples, 110 with single gene disorder, 88 with structural chromosome rearrangement and 13 for numerical chromosome aberration. There were 375 PGT cycles with oocyte retrieval, while embryo transfer was possible in 263 cases resulting in 78 deliveries and 84 children. Altogether, the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 31% in 2004-2016 (blastomere biopsy) and 43% in 2017-19 (blastocyst biopsy), respectively. We assessed that approximately a third of couples would opt for PGT, while the rest preferred natural conception with prenatal diagnosis. Our results show that providing a PGT service within the public healthcare system has become a considerable option in pregnancy planning for couples at risk of transmitting a severe genetic disease to their offspring. In Slovenia, approximately a third of couples would opt for PGT. Although the number of cycles is small, our clinical results are comparable to larger centres.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10932602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjmg-2023-0017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjmg-2023-0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植入前基因检测(PGT)是最早的产前诊断方式,对于有可能将严重遗传病遗传给后代的夫妇来说,PGT 已成为一项成熟的程序。在卢布尔雅那大学医疗中心,我们开展了一项以登记为基础的回顾性研究,介绍了斯洛文尼亚公共医疗系统 15 年来的 PGT 服务。我们收集了 2004 年至 2019 年的 PGT 周期数据,并比较了使用不同胚胎活检和检测方法治疗染色体疾病和单基因疾病的临床结果。此外,我们还评估了与传统产前诊断相比,PGT 成为首选的程度。我们共治疗了 211 对夫妇,其中 110 对患有单基因疾病,88 对患有染色体结构重排,13 对患有染色体数目畸变。有 375 个 PGT 周期进行了取卵,263 个病例进行了胚胎移植,结果有 78 例分娩和 84 个孩子。2004-2016年(囊胚活检)和2017-19年(囊胚活检),每次胚胎移植的临床妊娠率分别为31%和43%。我们评估发现,约有三分之一的夫妇会选择 PGT,而其他夫妇则倾向于自然受孕并进行产前诊断。我们的结果表明,在公共医疗系统内提供 PGT 服务已成为有可能将严重遗传病遗传给后代的夫妇在怀孕计划中的一个重要选择。在斯洛文尼亚,约有三分之一的夫妇会选择 PGT。虽然周期数不多,但我们的临床结果与较大的中心不相上下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preimplantation Genetic Testing within the Public Healthcare System in Slovenia.

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is the earliest form of prenatal diagnosis that has become an established procedure for couples at risk of passing a severe genetic disease to their offspring. At UMC Ljubljana, we conducted a retrospective register-based study to present 15 years of PGT service within the public healthcare system in Slovenia. We collected the data of the PGT cycles from 2004 to 2019 and compared clinical outcomes for chromosomal and monogenic diseases using different embryo biopsy and testing approaches. In addition, we assessed the extent to which PGT has become the preferred option compared to classic prenatal diagnostics. We treated 211 couples, 110 with single gene disorder, 88 with structural chromosome rearrangement and 13 for numerical chromosome aberration. There were 375 PGT cycles with oocyte retrieval, while embryo transfer was possible in 263 cases resulting in 78 deliveries and 84 children. Altogether, the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 31% in 2004-2016 (blastomere biopsy) and 43% in 2017-19 (blastocyst biopsy), respectively. We assessed that approximately a third of couples would opt for PGT, while the rest preferred natural conception with prenatal diagnosis. Our results show that providing a PGT service within the public healthcare system has become a considerable option in pregnancy planning for couples at risk of transmitting a severe genetic disease to their offspring. In Slovenia, approximately a third of couples would opt for PGT. Although the number of cycles is small, our clinical results are comparable to larger centres.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics is a journal in the English language for publication of articles involving all branches of medical genetics: human cytogenetics, molecular genetics, clinical genetics, immunogenetics, oncogenetics, pharmacogenetics, population genetics, genetic screening and diagnosis of monogenic and polygenic diseases, prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis, genetic counselling, advances in treatment and prevention.
期刊最新文献
Chromosomal Abnormalities in Early Pregnancy Losses: A Study of 900 Samples. Co-Existence of CYP2C19*1/*2 and ABCB1c.3435 CT Genotype has a Potential Impact on Clinical Outcome in CAD Patients Treated with Clopidogrel. Determination of the Relationship Between DNA Methylation Status of KLOTHO and ARNTL Genes With Hypertension. Do Gene Polymorphisms Play a Role in Newborn Hyperbilirubinemia? Droplet Digital PCR as a Molecular Tool for the Detection of the EGFR T790M Mutation in NSCLC Patients with the EGFR Activating Mutations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1