评估未来对 2 型糖尿病多阶段共同决策计划进行基于试验的经济评估的研究方法的可行性:群组随机对照试点研究方案

Anna Tichler, Dorijn F.L. Hertroijs, Ghislaine A.P.G. van Mastrigt, Martijn C.G.J. Brouwers, Dirk Ruwaard, Arianne M.J. Elissen
{"title":"评估未来对 2 型糖尿病多阶段共同决策计划进行基于试验的经济评估的研究方法的可行性:群组随机对照试点研究方案","authors":"Anna Tichler, Dorijn F.L. Hertroijs, Ghislaine A.P.G. van Mastrigt, Martijn C.G.J. Brouwers, Dirk Ruwaard, Arianne M.J. Elissen","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.10.24304052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction We developed a multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes that aims to support person-centered type 2 diabetes management in primary care. The program consists of an online patient decision aid, a preparatory consult for patients, and interprofessional training for healthcare professionals. The short- and long-term effectiveness of the multistage shared decision-making program needs to be researched in a trial-based economic evaluation. To evaluate the feasibility of study methods for future economic evaluation, we will conduct a pilot study that focuses on sample recruitment and retention, study management, and feasibility of outcome and cost measurements. Methods and analysis The multistage shared decision-making program will be pilot-tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in four primary care practices (located in the region of Gorinchem, the Netherlands) using a mixed-methods approach. The intervention practices will adopt the program, whereas the control practices provide usual care. Data collection will include recruitment, retention, and consent rates, patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the assessment of primary and secondary outcomes of the future trial-based economic evaluation. We will also collect data on the usage behavior of patients when completing questionnaires of the primary and secondary outcomes (i.e. time needed to complete questionnaires). Semi-structured interviews with patients will be conducted to obtain insights into the understandability and usability of measurement tools. Moreover, focus groups with healthcare professionals from participating practices will be organized to complement the quantitative data on sample representativeness and to assess the study management challenges of participating practices. Discussion The pilot will address uncertainties around the feasibility of a future trial-based economic evaluation, focusing on sample recruitment and retention, study management, and the feasibility of outcome and cost measurements. The results will guide the improvement of study procedures for the economic evaluation of our multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes.","PeriodicalId":501419,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the feasibility of study methods for a future trial-based economic evaluation of a multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes mellitus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Anna Tichler, Dorijn F.L. Hertroijs, Ghislaine A.P.G. van Mastrigt, Martijn C.G.J. Brouwers, Dirk Ruwaard, Arianne M.J. Elissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.10.24304052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction We developed a multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes that aims to support person-centered type 2 diabetes management in primary care. The program consists of an online patient decision aid, a preparatory consult for patients, and interprofessional training for healthcare professionals. The short- and long-term effectiveness of the multistage shared decision-making program needs to be researched in a trial-based economic evaluation. To evaluate the feasibility of study methods for future economic evaluation, we will conduct a pilot study that focuses on sample recruitment and retention, study management, and feasibility of outcome and cost measurements. Methods and analysis The multistage shared decision-making program will be pilot-tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in four primary care practices (located in the region of Gorinchem, the Netherlands) using a mixed-methods approach. The intervention practices will adopt the program, whereas the control practices provide usual care. Data collection will include recruitment, retention, and consent rates, patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the assessment of primary and secondary outcomes of the future trial-based economic evaluation. We will also collect data on the usage behavior of patients when completing questionnaires of the primary and secondary outcomes (i.e. time needed to complete questionnaires). Semi-structured interviews with patients will be conducted to obtain insights into the understandability and usability of measurement tools. Moreover, focus groups with healthcare professionals from participating practices will be organized to complement the quantitative data on sample representativeness and to assess the study management challenges of participating practices. Discussion The pilot will address uncertainties around the feasibility of a future trial-based economic evaluation, focusing on sample recruitment and retention, study management, and the feasibility of outcome and cost measurements. The results will guide the improvement of study procedures for the economic evaluation of our multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.10.24304052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.10.24304052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:我们开发了一项针对 2 型糖尿病的多阶段共同决策计划,旨在支持初级医疗中以人为中心的 2 型糖尿病管理。该项目包括在线患者决策辅助工具、患者预备咨询以及针对医护人员的跨专业培训。多阶段共同决策计划的短期和长期有效性需要通过基于试验的经济评估进行研究。为了评估未来经济评估研究方法的可行性,我们将开展一项试点研究,重点关注样本招募和保留、研究管理以及结果和成本测量的可行性。方法与分析 我们将采用混合方法,在四家基层医疗机构(位于荷兰戈林切姆地区)开展分组随机对照试验,对多阶段共同决策计划进行试点测试。干预实践将采用该计划,而对照实践则提供常规护理。数据收集将包括招募率、保留率和同意率,患者的社会人口学和临床特征,以及未来基于试验的经济评估的主要和次要结果评估。我们还将收集患者在填写主要和次要结果问卷时的使用行为数据(即填写问卷所需的时间)。我们还将对患者进行半结构式访谈,以了解测量工具的可理解性和可用性。此外,还将与参与实践的医护专业人员组织焦点小组,以补充有关样本代表性的定量数据,并评估参与实践的研究管理挑战。讨论 试验将解决未来基于试验的经济评估可行性方面的不确定性,重点是样本招募和保留、研究管理以及结果和成本测量的可行性。研究结果将指导我们改进 2 型糖尿病多阶段共同决策计划经济评估的研究程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the feasibility of study methods for a future trial-based economic evaluation of a multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes mellitus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled pilot study
Introduction We developed a multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes that aims to support person-centered type 2 diabetes management in primary care. The program consists of an online patient decision aid, a preparatory consult for patients, and interprofessional training for healthcare professionals. The short- and long-term effectiveness of the multistage shared decision-making program needs to be researched in a trial-based economic evaluation. To evaluate the feasibility of study methods for future economic evaluation, we will conduct a pilot study that focuses on sample recruitment and retention, study management, and feasibility of outcome and cost measurements. Methods and analysis The multistage shared decision-making program will be pilot-tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in four primary care practices (located in the region of Gorinchem, the Netherlands) using a mixed-methods approach. The intervention practices will adopt the program, whereas the control practices provide usual care. Data collection will include recruitment, retention, and consent rates, patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the assessment of primary and secondary outcomes of the future trial-based economic evaluation. We will also collect data on the usage behavior of patients when completing questionnaires of the primary and secondary outcomes (i.e. time needed to complete questionnaires). Semi-structured interviews with patients will be conducted to obtain insights into the understandability and usability of measurement tools. Moreover, focus groups with healthcare professionals from participating practices will be organized to complement the quantitative data on sample representativeness and to assess the study management challenges of participating practices. Discussion The pilot will address uncertainties around the feasibility of a future trial-based economic evaluation, focusing on sample recruitment and retention, study management, and the feasibility of outcome and cost measurements. The results will guide the improvement of study procedures for the economic evaluation of our multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Free fatty acids accelerate β-cell death in type 1 diabetes Detection of enterovirus RNA in pancreas and lymphoid tissues of organ donors with type 1 diabetes Sex and age differences in cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle at the onset of diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Spanish Primary Health Care. Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Creatine Transporter Deficiency and Guanidinoacetate Methyltransferase Deficiency Primary aldosteronism results in a decline estimated glomerular filtration rate independent of blood pressure: evidence from a case-control and mendelian randomization study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1