修正的暗能量 CPL 模型和观测制约因素

IF 1.4 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, NUCLEAR International Journal of Modern Physics a Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1142/s0217751x23501944
Gopal Sardar, Subenoy Chakraborty
{"title":"修正的暗能量 CPL 模型和观测制约因素","authors":"Gopal Sardar, Subenoy Chakraborty","doi":"10.1142/s0217751x23501944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this work, we consider two modified Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) models in the background of homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) space–time, namely, (i) the generalized CPL model (Model I) and (ii) the logarithmic form of the equation of state for the dark energy. From the observational data sets <span><math altimg=\"eq-00001.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mo stretchy=\"false\">(</mo><mo stretchy=\"false\">(</mo><mtext>Pantheon</mtext><mo>+</mo><mo stretchy=\"false\">)</mo><mo>+</mo><mtext>BAO</mtext><mo>+</mo><mtext>HST</mtext><mo stretchy=\"false\">)</mo></math></span><span></span>, we find that at the present epoch (redshift <span><math altimg=\"eq-00002.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mi>z</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span><span></span>), the equation of state for the dark energy converges almost at the same value <span><math altimg=\"eq-00003.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\"normal\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mn>6</mn></math></span><span></span> and the variation of <span><math altimg=\"eq-00004.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\"normal\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo stretchy=\"false\">(</mo><mi>z</mi><mo stretchy=\"false\">)</mo></math></span><span></span> with respect to the redshift parameter is very small for both models. We also find that the present value of the Hubble parameter <span><math altimg=\"eq-00005.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span><span></span> is almost same for both the models. Finally, we compare the models in the light of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Bayesian evidence. However, we find that Model II is better compared to Model I from the estimated value of the deceleration parameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":50309,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Modern Physics a","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified CPL models for dark energy and observational constraints\",\"authors\":\"Gopal Sardar, Subenoy Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0217751x23501944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this work, we consider two modified Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) models in the background of homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) space–time, namely, (i) the generalized CPL model (Model I) and (ii) the logarithmic form of the equation of state for the dark energy. From the observational data sets <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00001.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">(</mo><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">(</mo><mtext>Pantheon</mtext><mo>+</mo><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">)</mo><mo>+</mo><mtext>BAO</mtext><mo>+</mo><mtext>HST</mtext><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">)</mo></math></span><span></span>, we find that at the present epoch (redshift <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00002.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mi>z</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span><span></span>), the equation of state for the dark energy converges almost at the same value <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00003.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mn>6</mn></math></span><span></span> and the variation of <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00004.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">(</mo><mi>z</mi><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">)</mo></math></span><span></span> with respect to the redshift parameter is very small for both models. We also find that the present value of the Hubble parameter <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00005.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span><span></span> is almost same for both the models. Finally, we compare the models in the light of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Bayesian evidence. However, we find that Model II is better compared to Model I from the estimated value of the deceleration parameter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Modern Physics a\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Modern Physics a\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x23501944\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Modern Physics a","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x23501944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们考虑了在同质和各向同性的弗里德曼-勒梅特尔-罗伯逊-沃克(FLRW)时空背景下的两个修正的切瓦利埃-波兰斯基-林德(CPL)模型,即(i)广义 CPL 模型(模型 I)和(ii)暗能量状态方程的对数形式。从观测数据集((Pantheon+)+BAO+HST)中,我们发现在目前的年代(红移z=0),暗能量的状态方程几乎收敛在相同的值ωfld≈-0.86,而且ωfld(z)随红移参数的变化对这两个模型来说都非常小。我们还发现,两个模型的哈勃参数 H0 的现值几乎相同。最后,我们根据阿凯克信息准则(AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)和贝叶斯证据对两个模型进行了比较。然而,我们发现,从减速参数的估计值来看,模型 II 优于模型 I。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modified CPL models for dark energy and observational constraints

In this work, we consider two modified Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) models in the background of homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) space–time, namely, (i) the generalized CPL model (Model I) and (ii) the logarithmic form of the equation of state for the dark energy. From the observational data sets ((Pantheon+)+BAO+HST), we find that at the present epoch (redshift z=0), the equation of state for the dark energy converges almost at the same value ωfld0.86 and the variation of ωfld(z) with respect to the redshift parameter is very small for both models. We also find that the present value of the Hubble parameter H0 is almost same for both the models. Finally, we compare the models in the light of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Bayesian evidence. However, we find that Model II is better compared to Model I from the estimated value of the deceleration parameter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Modern Physics a
International Journal of Modern Physics a 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Started in 1986, IJMPA has gained international repute as a high-quality scientific journal. It consists of important review articles and original papers covering the latest research developments in Particles and Fields, and selected topics intersecting with Gravitation and Cosmology. The journal also features articles of long-standing value and importance which can be vital to research into new unexplored areas.
期刊最新文献
Gauge Bosons Masses in the context of the Supersymmetric SU(3)C⊗SU(3)L⊗U(1)N model Decay of the Higgs boson to longitudinally polarized leptons and quarks Energies and a gravitational charge for massive particles in general relativity Decays of radially excited vector mesons ρ′ and ω′ in the extended NJL model General perturbations in D+1 standard and brane cosmology revisited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1