{"title":"修正的暗能量 CPL 模型和观测制约因素","authors":"Gopal Sardar, Subenoy Chakraborty","doi":"10.1142/s0217751x23501944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this work, we consider two modified Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) models in the background of homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) space–time, namely, (i) the generalized CPL model (Model I) and (ii) the logarithmic form of the equation of state for the dark energy. From the observational data sets <span><math altimg=\"eq-00001.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mo stretchy=\"false\">(</mo><mo stretchy=\"false\">(</mo><mtext>Pantheon</mtext><mo>+</mo><mo stretchy=\"false\">)</mo><mo>+</mo><mtext>BAO</mtext><mo>+</mo><mtext>HST</mtext><mo stretchy=\"false\">)</mo></math></span><span></span>, we find that at the present epoch (redshift <span><math altimg=\"eq-00002.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><mi>z</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span><span></span>), the equation of state for the dark energy converges almost at the same value <span><math altimg=\"eq-00003.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\"normal\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mn>6</mn></math></span><span></span> and the variation of <span><math altimg=\"eq-00004.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\"normal\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo stretchy=\"false\">(</mo><mi>z</mi><mo stretchy=\"false\">)</mo></math></span><span></span> with respect to the redshift parameter is very small for both models. We also find that the present value of the Hubble parameter <span><math altimg=\"eq-00005.gif\" display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\"><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span><span></span> is almost same for both the models. Finally, we compare the models in the light of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Bayesian evidence. However, we find that Model II is better compared to Model I from the estimated value of the deceleration parameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":50309,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Modern Physics a","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified CPL models for dark energy and observational constraints\",\"authors\":\"Gopal Sardar, Subenoy Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0217751x23501944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this work, we consider two modified Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) models in the background of homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) space–time, namely, (i) the generalized CPL model (Model I) and (ii) the logarithmic form of the equation of state for the dark energy. From the observational data sets <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00001.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">(</mo><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">(</mo><mtext>Pantheon</mtext><mo>+</mo><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">)</mo><mo>+</mo><mtext>BAO</mtext><mo>+</mo><mtext>HST</mtext><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">)</mo></math></span><span></span>, we find that at the present epoch (redshift <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00002.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mi>z</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn></math></span><span></span>), the equation of state for the dark energy converges almost at the same value <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00003.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo>≈</mo><mo>−</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mn>6</mn></math></span><span></span> and the variation of <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00004.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><msub><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mstyle><mtext mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">fld</mtext></mstyle></mrow></msub><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">(</mo><mi>z</mi><mo stretchy=\\\"false\\\">)</mo></math></span><span></span> with respect to the redshift parameter is very small for both models. We also find that the present value of the Hubble parameter <span><math altimg=\\\"eq-00005.gif\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span><span></span> is almost same for both the models. Finally, we compare the models in the light of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Bayesian evidence. However, we find that Model II is better compared to Model I from the estimated value of the deceleration parameter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Modern Physics a\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Modern Physics a\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x23501944\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Modern Physics a","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x23501944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这项工作中,我们考虑了在同质和各向同性的弗里德曼-勒梅特尔-罗伯逊-沃克(FLRW)时空背景下的两个修正的切瓦利埃-波兰斯基-林德(CPL)模型,即(i)广义 CPL 模型(模型 I)和(ii)暗能量状态方程的对数形式。从观测数据集((Pantheon+)+BAO+HST)中,我们发现在目前的年代(红移z=0),暗能量的状态方程几乎收敛在相同的值ωfld≈-0.86,而且ωfld(z)随红移参数的变化对这两个模型来说都非常小。我们还发现,两个模型的哈勃参数 H0 的现值几乎相同。最后,我们根据阿凯克信息准则(AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)和贝叶斯证据对两个模型进行了比较。然而,我们发现,从减速参数的估计值来看,模型 II 优于模型 I。
Modified CPL models for dark energy and observational constraints
In this work, we consider two modified Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) models in the background of homogeneous and isotropic Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) space–time, namely, (i) the generalized CPL model (Model I) and (ii) the logarithmic form of the equation of state for the dark energy. From the observational data sets , we find that at the present epoch (redshift ), the equation of state for the dark energy converges almost at the same value and the variation of with respect to the redshift parameter is very small for both models. We also find that the present value of the Hubble parameter is almost same for both the models. Finally, we compare the models in the light of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Bayesian evidence. However, we find that Model II is better compared to Model I from the estimated value of the deceleration parameter.
期刊介绍:
Started in 1986, IJMPA has gained international repute as a high-quality scientific journal. It consists of important review articles and original papers covering the latest research developments in Particles and Fields, and selected topics intersecting with Gravitation and Cosmology. The journal also features articles of long-standing value and importance which can be vital to research into new unexplored areas.