研究设计参数对农业生态系统中蜜蜂丰度和富集度估计值的影响:荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Annals of The Entomological Society of America Pub Date : 2024-01-19 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/aesa/saae001
Hannah K Levenson, Bradley N Metz, David R Tarpy
{"title":"研究设计参数对农业生态系统中蜜蜂丰度和富集度估计值的影响:荟萃分析。","authors":"Hannah K Levenson, Bradley N Metz, David R Tarpy","doi":"10.1093/aesa/saae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pollinators are critical for agricultural production and food security, leading to many ongoing surveys of pollinators (especially bees) in crop and adjacent landscapes. These surveys have become increasingly important to better understand the community of potential pollinators, quantify relative insect abundance, and secure crop ecosystem services. However, as some bee populations are declining, there is a need to align and improve bee survey efforts, so that they can best meet research and conservation goals, particularly in light of the logistical and financial constraints of conducting such studies. Here, we mined the existing literature on bee surveys in or around agricultural lands to better understand how sampling methods can be optimized to maximize estimates of 2 key measures of bee communities (abundance and richness). After reviewing 72 papers spanning 20 yr of publication, we found that study duration, number of sites, sampling time, and sampling method most significantly influenced abundance, while the number of trips per year and collection method significantly influenced richness. Our analysis helps to derive thresholds, priorities, and recommendations that can be applied to future studies describing bee communities in agroecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8076,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10933562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of study design parameters on estimates of bee abundance and richness in agroecosystems: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah K Levenson, Bradley N Metz, David R Tarpy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aesa/saae001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pollinators are critical for agricultural production and food security, leading to many ongoing surveys of pollinators (especially bees) in crop and adjacent landscapes. These surveys have become increasingly important to better understand the community of potential pollinators, quantify relative insect abundance, and secure crop ecosystem services. However, as some bee populations are declining, there is a need to align and improve bee survey efforts, so that they can best meet research and conservation goals, particularly in light of the logistical and financial constraints of conducting such studies. Here, we mined the existing literature on bee surveys in or around agricultural lands to better understand how sampling methods can be optimized to maximize estimates of 2 key measures of bee communities (abundance and richness). After reviewing 72 papers spanning 20 yr of publication, we found that study duration, number of sites, sampling time, and sampling method most significantly influenced abundance, while the number of trips per year and collection method significantly influenced richness. Our analysis helps to derive thresholds, priorities, and recommendations that can be applied to future studies describing bee communities in agroecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of The Entomological Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10933562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of The Entomological Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saae001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The Entomological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saae001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

授粉昆虫对农业生产和粮食安全至关重要,因此目前正在对作物和邻近景观中的授粉昆虫(尤其是蜜蜂)进行许多调查。这些调查对于更好地了解潜在传粉昆虫群落、量化昆虫相对丰度和确保作物生态系统服务变得越来越重要。然而,由于一些蜜蜂种群正在减少,因此有必要调整和改进蜜蜂调查工作,使其能够最好地实现研究和保护目标,特别是考虑到开展此类研究的后勤和财政限制。在此,我们对农田内或农田周围蜜蜂调查的现有文献进行了挖掘,以更好地了解如何优化取样方法,最大限度地估算蜜蜂群落的两个关键指标(丰度和富集度)。在查阅了 72 篇发表了 20 年的论文后,我们发现研究持续时间、地点数量、取样时间和取样方法对丰度的影响最大,而每年的旅行次数和采集方法对丰富度的影响最大。我们的分析有助于得出阈值、优先事项和建议,可用于今后描述农业生态系统中蜜蜂群落的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of study design parameters on estimates of bee abundance and richness in agroecosystems: a meta-analysis.

Pollinators are critical for agricultural production and food security, leading to many ongoing surveys of pollinators (especially bees) in crop and adjacent landscapes. These surveys have become increasingly important to better understand the community of potential pollinators, quantify relative insect abundance, and secure crop ecosystem services. However, as some bee populations are declining, there is a need to align and improve bee survey efforts, so that they can best meet research and conservation goals, particularly in light of the logistical and financial constraints of conducting such studies. Here, we mined the existing literature on bee surveys in or around agricultural lands to better understand how sampling methods can be optimized to maximize estimates of 2 key measures of bee communities (abundance and richness). After reviewing 72 papers spanning 20 yr of publication, we found that study duration, number of sites, sampling time, and sampling method most significantly influenced abundance, while the number of trips per year and collection method significantly influenced richness. Our analysis helps to derive thresholds, priorities, and recommendations that can be applied to future studies describing bee communities in agroecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of the Entomological Society of America exists to stimulate interdisciplinary dialogue across the entomological disciplines and to advance cooperative interaction among diverse groups of entomologists. It seeks to attract and publish cutting-edge research, reviews, collections of articles on a common topic of broad interest, and discussion of topics with national or international importance. We especially welcome articles covering developing areas of research, controversial issues or debate, and topics of importance to society. Manuscripts that are primarily reports of new species, methodology, pest management, or the biology of single species generally will be referred to other journals of the ESA. The most important criteria for acceptance are quality of work and breadth of interest to the readership.
期刊最新文献
Broad host use and frequent polyandry in the facultative dulotic species Formica aserva (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Why all lawyers must study entomology. Curating BOLD records via Bayesian phylogenetic assignments enables harmonization of regional subgeneric classifications and cryptic species detection within the genus Tachina (Diptera: Tachinidae) Bee monitoring by community scientists: comparing a collections-based program with iNaturalist. On innovation and entomology: a path to renewed relevance and the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1