利用工作嵌入式专业发展干预措施探索教师对运动整合的看法

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102419
Kristina Maria Sobolewski , Larissa T. Lobo , Alexandra L. Stoddart , Serene Kerpan
{"title":"利用工作嵌入式专业发展干预措施探索教师对运动整合的看法","authors":"Kristina Maria Sobolewski ,&nbsp;Larissa T. Lobo ,&nbsp;Alexandra L. Stoddart ,&nbsp;Serene Kerpan","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to gain teachers’ insight and evaluate a teacher training intervention on movement integration (MI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An embedded mixed methods study was used to combine post-intervention qualitative and quantitative data from 12 teachers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four themes were generated: employable strategies, increased student engagement, value of additional support, and space, time, and behaviour management. These themes illustrate the intrapersonal, institutional, and public policy barriers that impact MI implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An evidence-based teacher MI implementation intervention that utilizes best practices can address intrapersonal barriers to MI use but does not alleviate institutional and public policy barriers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892400020X/pdfft?md5=9d3309df7256cb5fc56a6e797eaf61f5&pid=1-s2.0-S014971892400020X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring teachers’ perspectives on movement integration using a job-embedded professional development intervention\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Maria Sobolewski ,&nbsp;Larissa T. Lobo ,&nbsp;Alexandra L. Stoddart ,&nbsp;Serene Kerpan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to gain teachers’ insight and evaluate a teacher training intervention on movement integration (MI).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An embedded mixed methods study was used to combine post-intervention qualitative and quantitative data from 12 teachers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four themes were generated: employable strategies, increased student engagement, value of additional support, and space, time, and behaviour management. These themes illustrate the intrapersonal, institutional, and public policy barriers that impact MI implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An evidence-based teacher MI implementation intervention that utilizes best practices can address intrapersonal barriers to MI use but does not alleviate institutional and public policy barriers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892400020X/pdfft?md5=9d3309df7256cb5fc56a6e797eaf61f5&pid=1-s2.0-S014971892400020X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892400020X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892400020X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究旨在了解教师对运动整合(MI)教师培训干预措施的看法并对其进行评估。研究方法:本研究采用嵌入式混合方法,将来自 12 名教师的干预后定性和定量数据结合起来。这些主题说明了影响多元智能实施的个人、机构和公共政策障碍。结论以证据为基础的教师多元智能实施干预,利用最佳实践,可以解决使用多元智能的个人障碍,但不能减轻机构和公共政策障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring teachers’ perspectives on movement integration using a job-embedded professional development intervention

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to gain teachers’ insight and evaluate a teacher training intervention on movement integration (MI).

Methods

An embedded mixed methods study was used to combine post-intervention qualitative and quantitative data from 12 teachers.

Results

Four themes were generated: employable strategies, increased student engagement, value of additional support, and space, time, and behaviour management. These themes illustrate the intrapersonal, institutional, and public policy barriers that impact MI implementation.

Conclusion

An evidence-based teacher MI implementation intervention that utilizes best practices can address intrapersonal barriers to MI use but does not alleviate institutional and public policy barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Overview of rural credit environment in China: Measurement logic, evaluation system, and case analysis Using social research and development methods in artist-mediated workshops with Myanmar refugee women to design a culturally responsive community resettlement center Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review Analyzing the impact of the new educational policy 2020: A comprehensive review of India's educational reforms A deep dive into the factors affecting household solar photovoltaic adoption: An extended perspective of the value-based adoption model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1