零售电价设计对商业用户电动汽车充电的影响

Phillippe K. Phanivong;Duncan S. Callaway
{"title":"零售电价设计对商业用户电动汽车充电的影响","authors":"Phillippe K. Phanivong;Duncan S. Callaway","doi":"10.1109/TEMPR.2023.3343631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power engineers have examined the potential impacts on the electric grid of high electric vehicle (EV) adoption, while energy economists have shown issues with modern electricity retail tariff design. However, little work has shown how customer decisions regarding their tariff and optimizing EV charging costs could affect the utility and the customer. If commercial customers can optimize their charging profile, how do different tariff structures affect local distribution system voltage, utility cost recovery, and customer bills? To answer this question, we model commercial customers optimizing their EV charging to minimize costs using real-world tariffs. Then, we model the voltage impacts of customers charging EVs on a realistic distribution feeder. Finally, we calculate the costs of EV charging for customers and the distribution utility. We find that current tariff designs do not support large-scale deployments of EVs without system upgrades or additional control measures. We also find that customers can reduce costs nearly 15% by switching retail tariffs, leading to a potential revenue gap for the utility. Finally, we show that new power subscription-based tariffs are less efficient than traditional demand charge-based tariffs, and instead, designing tariffs for load optimization can reduce costs for both the customer and the utility.","PeriodicalId":100639,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","volume":"2 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impacts of Retail Tariff Design on Electric Vehicle Charging for Commercial Customers\",\"authors\":\"Phillippe K. Phanivong;Duncan S. Callaway\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEMPR.2023.3343631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Power engineers have examined the potential impacts on the electric grid of high electric vehicle (EV) adoption, while energy economists have shown issues with modern electricity retail tariff design. However, little work has shown how customer decisions regarding their tariff and optimizing EV charging costs could affect the utility and the customer. If commercial customers can optimize their charging profile, how do different tariff structures affect local distribution system voltage, utility cost recovery, and customer bills? To answer this question, we model commercial customers optimizing their EV charging to minimize costs using real-world tariffs. Then, we model the voltage impacts of customers charging EVs on a realistic distribution feeder. Finally, we calculate the costs of EV charging for customers and the distribution utility. We find that current tariff designs do not support large-scale deployments of EVs without system upgrades or additional control measures. We also find that customers can reduce costs nearly 15% by switching retail tariffs, leading to a potential revenue gap for the utility. Finally, we show that new power subscription-based tariffs are less efficient than traditional demand charge-based tariffs, and instead, designing tariffs for load optimization can reduce costs for both the customer and the utility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10361598/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10361598/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电力工程师研究了大量采用电动汽车(EV)对电网的潜在影响,而能源经济学家则指出了现代电力零售电价设计的问题。然而,很少有研究表明,客户在电价和优化电动汽车充电成本方面的决策会如何影响电力公司和客户。如果商业客户可以优化其充电情况,那么不同的电价结构会如何影响当地配电系统电压、电力公司成本回收和客户账单?为了回答这个问题,我们建立了商业客户优化电动汽车充电的模型,利用现实世界的电价将成本降至最低。然后,我们模拟客户在现实配电馈线上为电动汽车充电对电压的影响。最后,我们计算了客户和配电公司的电动汽车充电成本。我们发现,如果不进行系统升级或采取额外的控制措施,目前的电价设计无法支持电动汽车的大规模部署。我们还发现,客户通过转换零售电价可降低近 15%的成本,这将导致电力公司出现潜在的收入缺口。最后,我们表明,与传统的基于需求收费的电价相比,基于电力订购的新电价效率较低,相反,为优化负荷而设计电价可以降低客户和电力公司的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impacts of Retail Tariff Design on Electric Vehicle Charging for Commercial Customers
Power engineers have examined the potential impacts on the electric grid of high electric vehicle (EV) adoption, while energy economists have shown issues with modern electricity retail tariff design. However, little work has shown how customer decisions regarding their tariff and optimizing EV charging costs could affect the utility and the customer. If commercial customers can optimize their charging profile, how do different tariff structures affect local distribution system voltage, utility cost recovery, and customer bills? To answer this question, we model commercial customers optimizing their EV charging to minimize costs using real-world tariffs. Then, we model the voltage impacts of customers charging EVs on a realistic distribution feeder. Finally, we calculate the costs of EV charging for customers and the distribution utility. We find that current tariff designs do not support large-scale deployments of EVs without system upgrades or additional control measures. We also find that customers can reduce costs nearly 15% by switching retail tariffs, leading to a potential revenue gap for the utility. Finally, we show that new power subscription-based tariffs are less efficient than traditional demand charge-based tariffs, and instead, designing tariffs for load optimization can reduce costs for both the customer and the utility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2024 Index IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation Vol. 2 Table of Contents IEEE Power & Energy Society Information IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy, and Regulation Information for Authors Blank Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1