Bareq S. Al-Lami, Baqer S. Al-Lami, Yasir S. Al-Lami
{"title":"PET/CT与PET/MRI在胶质瘤治疗中作为成像模式的比较--系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bareq S. Al-Lami, Baqer S. Al-Lami, Yasir S. Al-Lami","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Gliomas are the most commonly occurring type of primary brain tumors. They account for 32% of all brain tumors and 80% of all malignant intracranial tumors. Gliomas are separated into four grades according to the World Health Organization. While low-grade gliomas generally have a favorable outlook, high-grade gliomas cause significant morbidity and mortality Given the lack of clarity about the causes of gliomas and their potential lethality, early diagnosis and identification is crucial.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The systematic literature search was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The electronic databases used were the following: Google Scholar, MEDLINE (PubMed), and EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Medical subject headings (MeSH) and Boolean operators were used to find any relevant literature. To evaluate the quality of the studies used, a quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four papers concerning the PET/MR modality that included 122 patients while on the other hand we had five papers about the PET/CT modality that included 251 patients. On both sides, the patients were mostly male and the overall mean age 45 ± 10 years. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PET/MR modality was found to be 89% (95% CI, <em>p</em> = 1.00) and 84% (95% CI, <em>p</em> = 1.00) respectively. In the four included studies revolving around PET/MR, the accuracy was found out to be: 78%, 96.4%, 100%, and N/R.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PET/MR modality was deemed to be slightly diagnostically better than the PET/CT modality. More studies investigating the efficacy of using hybrid FDG PET/MR in gliomas are encouraged to shed light on its potential role in clinical use. Conducting prospective randomized studies that directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT and PET/MR for glioma would help establish the role of imaging modalities for diagnosis of glioma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PET/CT in comparison with PET/MRI as an imaging modality in the management of Gliomas: A systematic review and meta analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bareq S. Al-Lami, Baqer S. Al-Lami, Yasir S. Al-Lami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Gliomas are the most commonly occurring type of primary brain tumors. They account for 32% of all brain tumors and 80% of all malignant intracranial tumors. Gliomas are separated into four grades according to the World Health Organization. While low-grade gliomas generally have a favorable outlook, high-grade gliomas cause significant morbidity and mortality Given the lack of clarity about the causes of gliomas and their potential lethality, early diagnosis and identification is crucial.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The systematic literature search was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The electronic databases used were the following: Google Scholar, MEDLINE (PubMed), and EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Medical subject headings (MeSH) and Boolean operators were used to find any relevant literature. To evaluate the quality of the studies used, a quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four papers concerning the PET/MR modality that included 122 patients while on the other hand we had five papers about the PET/CT modality that included 251 patients. On both sides, the patients were mostly male and the overall mean age 45 ± 10 years. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PET/MR modality was found to be 89% (95% CI, <em>p</em> = 1.00) and 84% (95% CI, <em>p</em> = 1.00) respectively. In the four included studies revolving around PET/MR, the accuracy was found out to be: 78%, 96.4%, 100%, and N/R.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The PET/MR modality was deemed to be slightly diagnostically better than the PET/CT modality. More studies investigating the efficacy of using hybrid FDG PET/MR in gliomas are encouraged to shed light on its potential role in clinical use. Conducting prospective randomized studies that directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT and PET/MR for glioma would help establish the role of imaging modalities for diagnosis of glioma.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424000213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
PET/CT in comparison with PET/MRI as an imaging modality in the management of Gliomas: A systematic review and meta analysis
Introduction
Gliomas are the most commonly occurring type of primary brain tumors. They account for 32% of all brain tumors and 80% of all malignant intracranial tumors. Gliomas are separated into four grades according to the World Health Organization. While low-grade gliomas generally have a favorable outlook, high-grade gliomas cause significant morbidity and mortality Given the lack of clarity about the causes of gliomas and their potential lethality, early diagnosis and identification is crucial.
Methods
The systematic literature search was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The electronic databases used were the following: Google Scholar, MEDLINE (PubMed), and EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Medical subject headings (MeSH) and Boolean operators were used to find any relevant literature. To evaluate the quality of the studies used, a quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2.
Results
Four papers concerning the PET/MR modality that included 122 patients while on the other hand we had five papers about the PET/CT modality that included 251 patients. On both sides, the patients were mostly male and the overall mean age 45 ± 10 years. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the PET/MR modality was found to be 89% (95% CI, p = 1.00) and 84% (95% CI, p = 1.00) respectively. In the four included studies revolving around PET/MR, the accuracy was found out to be: 78%, 96.4%, 100%, and N/R.
Conclusion
The PET/MR modality was deemed to be slightly diagnostically better than the PET/CT modality. More studies investigating the efficacy of using hybrid FDG PET/MR in gliomas are encouraged to shed light on its potential role in clinical use. Conducting prospective randomized studies that directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT and PET/MR for glioma would help establish the role of imaging modalities for diagnosis of glioma.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
