将分散的老年医学医疗保健系统整合在一起将非常困难。是时候采取联合行动了

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.026
Christopher C. Colenda M.D., M.P.H. , William B. Applegate M.D., M.P.H.
{"title":"将分散的老年医学医疗保健系统整合在一起将非常困难。是时候采取联合行动了","authors":"Christopher C. Colenda M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;William B. Applegate M.D., M.P.H.","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>“Gluing” together integrated Geriatric<span> Clinical Service lines (GCSL) within the US healthcare system is a significant challenge. Reasons encompass health professional workforce shortages, inconsistent requirements for geriatric educational competencies among the health professional disciplines, preconceived ageist attitudes about older adults with complex illnesses, and a US healthcare system infrastructure that is not aligned with longitudinal and interdisciplinary care needs for older adults. This review focuses on three major characteristics of the US healthcare system that have impeded widespread dissemination of GCSLs: 1) the US's historical fee for service (FFS) reimbursement system; 2) increasing reliance upon disease specific specialty care services for older patients that have resulted from advances in medicine; and 3) rising consolidation of US healthcare systems over the last 30 years. Three specific options are also provided that might help change the current and future trajectories of GCSLs: 1) local political advocacy to implement health policy legislation; 2) expand geriatric physician and health professional workforce by nontraditional means; and 3) reprioritize expansionist healthcare systems corporate behavior. Each of these interventions will be hard to achieve, but it is time to unite if GCSLs are to thrive as pathways to improve care outcomes for older adults with complex medical, cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gluing Together a Fragmented Healthcare System for Geriatrics Will Be Hard. It's Time for United Action\",\"authors\":\"Christopher C. Colenda M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;William B. Applegate M.D., M.P.H.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>“Gluing” together integrated Geriatric<span> Clinical Service lines (GCSL) within the US healthcare system is a significant challenge. Reasons encompass health professional workforce shortages, inconsistent requirements for geriatric educational competencies among the health professional disciplines, preconceived ageist attitudes about older adults with complex illnesses, and a US healthcare system infrastructure that is not aligned with longitudinal and interdisciplinary care needs for older adults. This review focuses on three major characteristics of the US healthcare system that have impeded widespread dissemination of GCSLs: 1) the US's historical fee for service (FFS) reimbursement system; 2) increasing reliance upon disease specific specialty care services for older patients that have resulted from advances in medicine; and 3) rising consolidation of US healthcare systems over the last 30 years. Three specific options are also provided that might help change the current and future trajectories of GCSLs: 1) local political advocacy to implement health policy legislation; 2) expand geriatric physician and health professional workforce by nontraditional means; and 3) reprioritize expansionist healthcare systems corporate behavior. Each of these interventions will be hard to achieve, but it is time to unite if GCSLs are to thrive as pathways to improve care outcomes for older adults with complex medical, cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748124000265\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748124000265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国医疗保健系统中 "粘合 "一体化老年医学临床服务项目(GCSL)是一项重大挑战。原因包括医疗专业人员短缺、医疗专业学科对老年医学教育能力的要求不一致、对患有复杂疾病的老年人存在先入为主的年龄歧视态度,以及美国医疗系统的基础设施与老年人的纵向和跨学科护理需求不一致。本综述将重点关注美国医疗保健系统中阻碍全球老年患者护理方案广泛传播的三大特点:1) 美国历史上的按服务收费(FFS)报销制度;2) 由于医学的进步,老年患者越来越依赖于特定疾病的专科护理服务;3) 在过去的 30 年中,美国医疗保健系统不断整合。本报告还提供了三种可能有助于改变全球慢性病实验室当前和未来发展轨迹的具体方案:1) 通过地方政治倡导来实施医疗政策立法;2) 通过非传统手段来扩大老年病医生和医疗专业人员的队伍;3) 重新调整扩张型医疗系统企业行为的优先次序。这些干预措施中的每一项都很难实现,但现在是团结起来的时候了,只有这样,老年病护理中心才能茁壮成长,成为改善患有复杂的医疗、认知和神经精神疾病的老年人护理效果的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gluing Together a Fragmented Healthcare System for Geriatrics Will Be Hard. It's Time for United Action

“Gluing” together integrated Geriatric Clinical Service lines (GCSL) within the US healthcare system is a significant challenge. Reasons encompass health professional workforce shortages, inconsistent requirements for geriatric educational competencies among the health professional disciplines, preconceived ageist attitudes about older adults with complex illnesses, and a US healthcare system infrastructure that is not aligned with longitudinal and interdisciplinary care needs for older adults. This review focuses on three major characteristics of the US healthcare system that have impeded widespread dissemination of GCSLs: 1) the US's historical fee for service (FFS) reimbursement system; 2) increasing reliance upon disease specific specialty care services for older patients that have resulted from advances in medicine; and 3) rising consolidation of US healthcare systems over the last 30 years. Three specific options are also provided that might help change the current and future trajectories of GCSLs: 1) local political advocacy to implement health policy legislation; 2) expand geriatric physician and health professional workforce by nontraditional means; and 3) reprioritize expansionist healthcare systems corporate behavior. Each of these interventions will be hard to achieve, but it is time to unite if GCSLs are to thrive as pathways to improve care outcomes for older adults with complex medical, cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents In This Issue Information for Subscribers Suicidal Behavior in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1