经皮肾镜取石手术治疗复杂肾结石患者的仰卧位与俯卧位对比。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1177/03915603241229801
Krishnendu Maiti, Kani Dayal Khare, Dilip Kumar Pal
{"title":"经皮肾镜取石手术治疗复杂肾结石患者的仰卧位与俯卧位对比。","authors":"Krishnendu Maiti, Kani Dayal Khare, Dilip Kumar Pal","doi":"10.1177/03915603241229801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare the surgical outcomes, safety, stone free rate, hospital stay, and complication of prone and supine PCNL in case of complex renal stone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is an observational study conducted in our institute, it consist of 120 patients over the period of 2 years from July 2021 to June 2023, all the patients were divided into two groups: 60 patients underwent modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and remaining 60 patients underwent standard prone PCNL. The measured data included operative time, number of punctures, blood loss, stone-free rate, length of hospital stays, and rate of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were comparable in mean age, male to female ratio, number of punctures, number of tract, size of tract, residual calculi in follow up period, blood transfusion, re-do surgery, chest complication, hospital stay, and postoperative fever and pain. The mean operating time was 1.59 h in supine PCNL and 2.49 h in prone PCNL. The <i>p</i> value was significant (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By this study we observed that the supine PCNL is associated with statistically significant reduced operating time as compared to conventional prone PCNL with advantages of not putting the patient in prone position. The postoperative complications such as pain and fever were not significant when compared in both groups. We conclude our study and found that, the supine PCNL is an equally effective in treating complex renal stone as compared to prone PCNL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"558-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of patient with complex renal stone diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Krishnendu Maiti, Kani Dayal Khare, Dilip Kumar Pal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241229801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare the surgical outcomes, safety, stone free rate, hospital stay, and complication of prone and supine PCNL in case of complex renal stone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is an observational study conducted in our institute, it consist of 120 patients over the period of 2 years from July 2021 to June 2023, all the patients were divided into two groups: 60 patients underwent modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and remaining 60 patients underwent standard prone PCNL. The measured data included operative time, number of punctures, blood loss, stone-free rate, length of hospital stays, and rate of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were comparable in mean age, male to female ratio, number of punctures, number of tract, size of tract, residual calculi in follow up period, blood transfusion, re-do surgery, chest complication, hospital stay, and postoperative fever and pain. The mean operating time was 1.59 h in supine PCNL and 2.49 h in prone PCNL. The <i>p</i> value was significant (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By this study we observed that the supine PCNL is associated with statistically significant reduced operating time as compared to conventional prone PCNL with advantages of not putting the patient in prone position. The postoperative complications such as pain and fever were not significant when compared in both groups. We conclude our study and found that, the supine PCNL is an equally effective in treating complex renal stone as compared to prone PCNL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"558-562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241229801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241229801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较俯卧位和仰卧位PCNL治疗复杂性肾结石的手术效果、安全性、无结石率、住院时间和并发症:这是一项在我院进行的观察性研究,从 2021 年 7 月到 2023 年 6 月的两年时间里,共有 120 例患者,所有患者被分为两组:60 例患者接受了改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL),其余 60 例患者接受了标准俯卧位 PCNL。测量数据包括手术时间、穿刺次数、失血量、无石率、住院时间和并发症发生率:结果:两组在平均年龄、男女比例、穿刺次数、结石道数量、结石道大小、随访期间结石残留、输血、再次手术、胸部并发症、住院时间、术后发热和疼痛等方面具有可比性。仰卧位 PCNL 平均手术时间为 1.59 小时,俯卧位 PCNL 平均手术时间为 2.49 小时。P值显著(P = 0.001):通过这项研究,我们发现与传统的俯卧位 PCNL 相比,仰卧位 PCNL 的手术时间在统计学上有显著缩短,而且患者无需采取俯卧位。两组患者的术后并发症(如疼痛和发烧)比较无显著差异。我们的研究得出结论,仰卧位 PCNL 与俯卧位 PCNL 相比,在治疗复杂性肾结石方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of patient with complex renal stone diseases.

Objectives: Compare the surgical outcomes, safety, stone free rate, hospital stay, and complication of prone and supine PCNL in case of complex renal stone.

Materials and methods: This is an observational study conducted in our institute, it consist of 120 patients over the period of 2 years from July 2021 to June 2023, all the patients were divided into two groups: 60 patients underwent modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and remaining 60 patients underwent standard prone PCNL. The measured data included operative time, number of punctures, blood loss, stone-free rate, length of hospital stays, and rate of complications.

Results: The two groups were comparable in mean age, male to female ratio, number of punctures, number of tract, size of tract, residual calculi in follow up period, blood transfusion, re-do surgery, chest complication, hospital stay, and postoperative fever and pain. The mean operating time was 1.59 h in supine PCNL and 2.49 h in prone PCNL. The p value was significant (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: By this study we observed that the supine PCNL is associated with statistically significant reduced operating time as compared to conventional prone PCNL with advantages of not putting the patient in prone position. The postoperative complications such as pain and fever were not significant when compared in both groups. We conclude our study and found that, the supine PCNL is an equally effective in treating complex renal stone as compared to prone PCNL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for benign uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures after open radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. On integrative analysis of multi-level gene expression data in Kidney cancer subgrouping. A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access. Potential value of Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 score in prediction of final cancer pathology parameters in radical prostatectomy patients. Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) versus surgical findings in assessment of urethral strictures length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1