择期减肥手术患者预防性头孢西丁的群体药代动力学:前瞻性单中心研究

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101376
Emmanuel Novy , Xin Liu , María Patricia Hernández-Mitre , Thibaut Belveyre , Julien Scala-Bertola , Jason A. Roberts , Suzanne L. Parker
{"title":"择期减肥手术患者预防性头孢西丁的群体药代动力学:前瞻性单中心研究","authors":"Emmanuel Novy ,&nbsp;Xin Liu ,&nbsp;María Patricia Hernández-Mitre ,&nbsp;Thibaut Belveyre ,&nbsp;Julien Scala-Bertola ,&nbsp;Jason A. Roberts ,&nbsp;Suzanne L. Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study describes the population pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in obese patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery and evaluates different dosing regimens for achievement of pre-defined target exposures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Serial blood samples were collected during surgery with relevant clinical data. Total serum cefoxitin concentrations were measured by chromatographic assay and analysed using a population PK approach with Pmetrics®. The cefoxitin unbound fraction (fu) was estimated. Dosing simulations were performed to ascertain the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve cefoxitin fu above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) from surgical incision to wound closure. Fractional target attainment (FTA) was calculated against MIC distributions of common pathogens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 123 obese patients (median BMI 44.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included with 381 cefoxitin concentration values. Cefoxitin was best described by a one-compartment model, with a mean clearance and volume of distribution of 10.9 ± 6.1 L/h and 23.4 ± 10.5 L, respectively. In surgery &lt;2 h, a 2 and a 4 g doses were sufficient for an MIC up to 4 and 8 mg/L (fu 50%), respectively. In prolonged surgery (2–4 h), only continuous infusion enabled optimal PTA for an MIC up to 16 mg/L. Optimal FTAs were obtained against <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and <em>Escherichia Coli</em> only when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding (intermittent regimen) and regardless of the protein binding for the continuous infusion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intermittent dosing regimens resulted in optimal FTAs against susceptible MIC distributions of <em>S. aureus</em> and <em>E. coli</em> when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding. Continuous infusion of cefoxitin may improve FTA regardless of protein binding.</p></div><div><h3>Study registration</h3><p>Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306290</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 3","pages":"Article 101376"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in elective bariatric surgery patients: a prospective monocentric study\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Novy ,&nbsp;Xin Liu ,&nbsp;María Patricia Hernández-Mitre ,&nbsp;Thibaut Belveyre ,&nbsp;Julien Scala-Bertola ,&nbsp;Jason A. Roberts ,&nbsp;Suzanne L. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study describes the population pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in obese patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery and evaluates different dosing regimens for achievement of pre-defined target exposures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Serial blood samples were collected during surgery with relevant clinical data. Total serum cefoxitin concentrations were measured by chromatographic assay and analysed using a population PK approach with Pmetrics®. The cefoxitin unbound fraction (fu) was estimated. Dosing simulations were performed to ascertain the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve cefoxitin fu above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) from surgical incision to wound closure. Fractional target attainment (FTA) was calculated against MIC distributions of common pathogens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 123 obese patients (median BMI 44.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included with 381 cefoxitin concentration values. Cefoxitin was best described by a one-compartment model, with a mean clearance and volume of distribution of 10.9 ± 6.1 L/h and 23.4 ± 10.5 L, respectively. In surgery &lt;2 h, a 2 and a 4 g doses were sufficient for an MIC up to 4 and 8 mg/L (fu 50%), respectively. In prolonged surgery (2–4 h), only continuous infusion enabled optimal PTA for an MIC up to 16 mg/L. Optimal FTAs were obtained against <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and <em>Escherichia Coli</em> only when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding (intermittent regimen) and regardless of the protein binding for the continuous infusion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intermittent dosing regimens resulted in optimal FTAs against susceptible MIC distributions of <em>S. aureus</em> and <em>E. coli</em> when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding. Continuous infusion of cefoxitin may improve FTA regardless of protein binding.</p></div><div><h3>Study registration</h3><p>Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306290</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究描述了接受择期减肥手术的肥胖患者中头孢西丁的群体药代动力学,并评估了不同给药方案对达到预定目标暴露量的影响:本研究描述了接受择期减肥手术的肥胖患者体内头孢西丁的群体药代动力学,并评估了不同给药方案对达到预定目标暴露量的影响:方法:收集手术期间的连续血样和相关临床数据。方法:在手术期间采集血样并提供相关临床数据,通过色谱分析法测定血清中头孢西丁的总浓度,并使用 Pmetrics® 进行群体 PK 分析。估计了头孢西丁的非结合部分(fu)。进行了剂量模拟,以确定从手术切口到伤口闭合期间,头孢西丁浓度高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的达标概率(PTA)。根据常见病原体的 MIC 分布计算了达到目标的几率(FTA):结果:共纳入 123 名肥胖患者(中位体重指数为 44.3 kg/m2),381 个头孢西丁浓度值。头孢西丁用单室模型进行了最佳描述,其平均清除率和分布容积分别为 10.9 ± 6.1 L/h 和 23.4 ± 10.5 L。手术中在模拟头孢西丁蛋白结合率为 50%的情况下,间歇给药方案对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的易感 MIC 分布产生了最佳 FTA。连续输注头孢西丁可改善FTA,而与蛋白结合无关:研究注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03306290。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in elective bariatric surgery patients: a prospective monocentric study

Background

This study describes the population pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in obese patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery and evaluates different dosing regimens for achievement of pre-defined target exposures.

Methods

Serial blood samples were collected during surgery with relevant clinical data. Total serum cefoxitin concentrations were measured by chromatographic assay and analysed using a population PK approach with Pmetrics®. The cefoxitin unbound fraction (fu) was estimated. Dosing simulations were performed to ascertain the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve cefoxitin fu above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) from surgical incision to wound closure. Fractional target attainment (FTA) was calculated against MIC distributions of common pathogens.

Results

A total of 123 obese patients (median BMI 44.3 kg/m2) were included with 381 cefoxitin concentration values. Cefoxitin was best described by a one-compartment model, with a mean clearance and volume of distribution of 10.9 ± 6.1 L/h and 23.4 ± 10.5 L, respectively. In surgery <2 h, a 2 and a 4 g doses were sufficient for an MIC up to 4 and 8 mg/L (fu 50%), respectively. In prolonged surgery (2–4 h), only continuous infusion enabled optimal PTA for an MIC up to 16 mg/L. Optimal FTAs were obtained against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli only when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding (intermittent regimen) and regardless of the protein binding for the continuous infusion.

Conclusion

Intermittent dosing regimens resulted in optimal FTAs against susceptible MIC distributions of S. aureus and E. coli when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding. Continuous infusion of cefoxitin may improve FTA regardless of protein binding.

Study registration

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306290

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Are corticosteroids in intensive care immunosuppressive? Reflections and hypotheses. Transfusion thresholds after acute brain injury: How can they impact on protocols optimizing brain oxygenation? Transfusion strategy in the most critically patients with trauma brain injury: Differences to other populations? Protecting the lungs during surgery: modes of ventilation are no silver bullet. Cardiac surgery associated-acute kidney injury: deciphering renal physiology to understand effects of amino acids infusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1