健康指导可改善慢性非癌性疼痛成人的体育活动、残疾和疼痛状况:系统性综述。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jphys.2024.01.001
Talia Barnet-Hepples , Amabile Dario , Juliana Oliveira , Christopher Maher , Anne Tiedemann , Anita Amorim
{"title":"健康指导可改善慢性非癌性疼痛成人的体育活动、残疾和疼痛状况:系统性综述。","authors":"Talia Barnet-Hepples ,&nbsp;Amabile Dario ,&nbsp;Juliana Oliveira ,&nbsp;Christopher Maher ,&nbsp;Anne Tiedemann ,&nbsp;Anita Amorim","doi":"10.1016/j.jphys.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>What is the effect of health coaching on physical activity, disability, pain and quality of life compared with a non-active control in adults with chronic non-cancer pain?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Evidence was synthesised as standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine evidence certainty.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus and PEDro were searched from inception to November 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults with chronic non-cancer pain.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Health coaching to increase physical activity.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Measures of physical activity, disability, pain and quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six randomised trials (n = 4,403) were included. Trials had moderate to high risk of bias. Health coaching had a trivial to small effect on improving physical activity compared with control (15 trials; SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.35; low certainty evidence). Health coaching had a small effect on improving disability (19 trials; SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.32; moderate certainty evidence) and pain (19 trials; SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.43; very low certainty evidence) compared with control. The effect of health coaching on quality of life was unclear due to significant imprecision in the effect estimate (five trials; SMD 0.19, 95% CI –0.14 to 0.53; moderate certainty evidence).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Health coaching promotes a trivial to small improvement in physical activity and small improvements in disability and pain in adults with chronic non-cancer pain. The effect of health coaching on quality of life remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>PROSPERO CRD42020182740.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"70 2","pages":"Pages 115-123"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S183695532400002X/pdfft?md5=18b0268dbfa50d8d528be30d176f02c5&pid=1-s2.0-S183695532400002X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health coaching improves physical activity, disability and pain in adults with chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Talia Barnet-Hepples ,&nbsp;Amabile Dario ,&nbsp;Juliana Oliveira ,&nbsp;Christopher Maher ,&nbsp;Anne Tiedemann ,&nbsp;Anita Amorim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jphys.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>What is the effect of health coaching on physical activity, disability, pain and quality of life compared with a non-active control in adults with chronic non-cancer pain?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Evidence was synthesised as standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine evidence certainty.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus and PEDro were searched from inception to November 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults with chronic non-cancer pain.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Health coaching to increase physical activity.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Measures of physical activity, disability, pain and quality of life.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six randomised trials (n = 4,403) were included. Trials had moderate to high risk of bias. Health coaching had a trivial to small effect on improving physical activity compared with control (15 trials; SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.35; low certainty evidence). Health coaching had a small effect on improving disability (19 trials; SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.32; moderate certainty evidence) and pain (19 trials; SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.43; very low certainty evidence) compared with control. The effect of health coaching on quality of life was unclear due to significant imprecision in the effect estimate (five trials; SMD 0.19, 95% CI –0.14 to 0.53; moderate certainty evidence).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Health coaching promotes a trivial to small improvement in physical activity and small improvements in disability and pain in adults with chronic non-cancer pain. The effect of health coaching on quality of life remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>PROSPERO CRD42020182740.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"70 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S183695532400002X/pdfft?md5=18b0268dbfa50d8d528be30d176f02c5&pid=1-s2.0-S183695532400002X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S183695532400002X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S183695532400002X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题在患有慢性非癌性疼痛的成年人中,健康指导对身体活动、残疾、疼痛和生活质量的影响与非活动对照组相比如何?对随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。采用随机效应模型,以标准化平均差和 95% 置信区间对证据进行综合。使用修订版 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。采用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)确定证据的确定性:检索了从开始到 2023 年 11 月的 MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Scopus 和 PEDro:干预措施:增加体育锻炼的健康指导:干预措施:健康指导以增加体育锻炼:结果:对身体活动、残疾、疼痛和生活质量进行测量:结果:共纳入 26 项随机试验(n = 4 403)。试验存在中度至高度偏倚风险。与对照组相比,健康指导对提高身体活动量的影响微不足道(15 项试验;SMD 0.21,95% CI 0.07 至 0.35;证据确定性低)。与对照组相比,健康指导对改善残疾(19 项试验;SMD 0.25,95% CI 0.17 至 0.32;中等确定性证据)和疼痛(19 项试验;SMD 0.31,95% CI 0.18 至 0.43;极低确定性证据)的影响较小。健康指导对生活质量的影响尚不明确,因为其效果估计值极不精确(5项试验;SMD为0.19,95% CI为-0.14至0.53;中度确定性证据):结论:对患有慢性非癌症疼痛的成年人而言,健康指导可促进其体育锻炼的微小改善以及残疾和疼痛的小幅改善。健康指导对生活质量的影响尚不明确:ProCOMO CRD42020182740.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health coaching improves physical activity, disability and pain in adults with chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review

Question

What is the effect of health coaching on physical activity, disability, pain and quality of life compared with a non-active control in adults with chronic non-cancer pain?

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Evidence was synthesised as standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine evidence certainty.

Data sources

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus and PEDro were searched from inception to November 2023.

Participants

Adults with chronic non-cancer pain.

Intervention

Health coaching to increase physical activity.

Outcome measures

Measures of physical activity, disability, pain and quality of life.

Results

Twenty-six randomised trials (n = 4,403) were included. Trials had moderate to high risk of bias. Health coaching had a trivial to small effect on improving physical activity compared with control (15 trials; SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.35; low certainty evidence). Health coaching had a small effect on improving disability (19 trials; SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.32; moderate certainty evidence) and pain (19 trials; SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.43; very low certainty evidence) compared with control. The effect of health coaching on quality of life was unclear due to significant imprecision in the effect estimate (five trials; SMD 0.19, 95% CI –0.14 to 0.53; moderate certainty evidence).

Conclusion

Health coaching promotes a trivial to small improvement in physical activity and small improvements in disability and pain in adults with chronic non-cancer pain. The effect of health coaching on quality of life remains unclear.

Registration

PROSPERO CRD42020182740.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiotherapy
Journal of Physiotherapy ORTHOPEDICS-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiotherapy is the official journal of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. It aims to publish high-quality research with a significant impact on global physiotherapy practice. The journal's vision is to lead the field in supporting clinicians to access, understand, and implement research evidence that will enhance person-centred care. In January 2008, the Journal of Physiotherapy became the first physiotherapy journal to adhere to the ICMJE requirement of registering randomized trials with a recognized Trial Registry. The journal prioritizes systematic reviews, clinical trials, economic analyses, experimental studies, qualitative studies, epidemiological studies, and observational studies. In January 2014, it also became the first core physiotherapy/physical therapy journal to provide free access to editorials and peer-reviewed original research. The Australian Physiotherapy Association extended their support for excellence in physiotherapy practice by sponsoring open access publication of all Journal of Physiotherapy content in 2016. As a result, all past, present, and future journal articles are freely accessible, and there are no author fees for publication.
期刊最新文献
Critically appraised paper: An internet intervention with or without telephone support in primary care is not superior to usual care for low back pain [commentary]. Critically appraised paper: An individualised, progressive walking and education intervention reduces the risk of low back pain recurrence [commentary]. Contents Critically appraised paper: Telerehabilitation consultations with a physiotherapist are non-inferior to in-person consultations for chronic knee pain Critically appraised paper: Telerehabilitation is non-inferior to in-person care for chronic knee pain [commentary]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1