在预测卵巢肿瘤恶性风险时,血清蛋白对临床和超声波信息的附加值

An Coosemans, Jolien Ceusters, Chiara Landolfo, Thaïs Baert, Wouter Froyman, Ruben Heremans, Gitte Thirion, Sandra Claes, Julie Oosterlynck, Roxanne Wouters, Ann Vankerckhoven, Francesca Moro, Floriana Mascilini, Adam Neumann, Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy, Dominique Schols, Jaak Billen, Toon Van Gorp, Ignace Vergote, Tom Bourne, Caroline Van Holsbeke, Valentina Chiappa, Giovanni Scambia, Antonia Testa, Daniela Fischerova, Dirk Timmerman, Ben Van Calster
{"title":"在预测卵巢肿瘤恶性风险时,血清蛋白对临床和超声波信息的附加值","authors":"An Coosemans, Jolien Ceusters, Chiara Landolfo, Thaïs Baert, Wouter Froyman, Ruben Heremans, Gitte Thirion, Sandra Claes, Julie Oosterlynck, Roxanne Wouters, Ann Vankerckhoven, Francesca Moro, Floriana Mascilini, Adam Neumann, Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy, Dominique Schols, Jaak Billen, Toon Van Gorp, Ignace Vergote, Tom Bourne, Caroline Van Holsbeke, Valentina Chiappa, Giovanni Scambia, Antonia Testa, Daniela Fischerova, Dirk Timmerman, Ben Van Calster","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.14.24304282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ADNEX model (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) is the best performing model to predict the risk of malignancy (binary) and type of malignancy (multiclass) in ovarian tumors. The immune system plays a role in the onset and progression of ovarian cancer. Preliminary research has suggested that immune-related biomarkers can help in the discrimination of ovarian tumors. We aimed to assess which proteins have the most additional diagnostic value in addition to ADNEX' clinical and ultrasound predictors. Materials and methods: In this exploratory diagnostic study, 1086 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively enrolled at five oncology centers and one non-oncology center in Belgium, Italy, Czech Republic and United Kingdom between 2015 and 2019. The quantification of 33 serum proteins was carried out preoperatively, using multiplex high throughput immunoassays (Luminex) and electrochemiluminescence immuno-assay (ECLIA). Logistic regression analysis was performed for ADNEX' clinical and ultrasound predictors alone (age, maximum diameter of lesion, proportion of solid tissue, presence of >10 cyst locules, number of papillary projections, acoustic shadows and ascites) and after adding proteins. We reported the AUC for benign vs malignant, Polytomous Discrimination Index (PDI; a multiclass AUC) and pairwise AUCs for pairs of tumor types. AUCs were corrected for optimism using bootstrapping.\nResults: After applying exclusion criteria, 932/1086 patients were eligible for analysis (474 benign, 135 borderline, 84 stage I primary invasive cancer, 208 stage II-IV primary invasive cancer, 31 secondary metastatic invasive tumors). ADNEX predictors alone had an AUC of 0.909 (95% CI 0.894-0.929) to discriminate benign from malignant tumors, and a PDI of 0.532 (0.510-0.589). HE4 yielded the highest increase in AUC (+0.026), followed by CA125 (+0.017). CA125 yielded the highest increase in PDI (+0.049), followed by HE4 (+0.036). Whereas CA125 mainly improved pairwise AUCs between different types of invasive tumors (increases between 0.020-0.165 over ADNEX alone), HE4 mainly improved pairwise AUCs for benign tumors versus stage I (+0.022) and benign tumors versus stage II-IV ovarian cancers (+0.028). CA72.4 might be useful to distinguishing secondary metastatic tumors from benign, borderline, and stage I tumors. CA15.3 might be useful to discriminate borderline tumors from stage I and stage II-IV tumors. Distinguishing stage I and borderline tumors (AUCs ≤ 0.72) and stage I and secondary metastatic tumors (AUCs ≤ 0.76) remained difficult after adding proteins. Conclusions: CA125 had the highest added value over clinical and ultrasound predictors to distinguish between the five tumor types, followed by HE4. In addition, CA72.4 and CA15.3 may further improve discrimination but findings for these proteins should be confirmed. The immune-related proteins were in general not able to discriminate the groups.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Added value of serum proteins to clinical and ultrasound information in predicting the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors\",\"authors\":\"An Coosemans, Jolien Ceusters, Chiara Landolfo, Thaïs Baert, Wouter Froyman, Ruben Heremans, Gitte Thirion, Sandra Claes, Julie Oosterlynck, Roxanne Wouters, Ann Vankerckhoven, Francesca Moro, Floriana Mascilini, Adam Neumann, Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy, Dominique Schols, Jaak Billen, Toon Van Gorp, Ignace Vergote, Tom Bourne, Caroline Van Holsbeke, Valentina Chiappa, Giovanni Scambia, Antonia Testa, Daniela Fischerova, Dirk Timmerman, Ben Van Calster\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.14.24304282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The ADNEX model (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) is the best performing model to predict the risk of malignancy (binary) and type of malignancy (multiclass) in ovarian tumors. The immune system plays a role in the onset and progression of ovarian cancer. Preliminary research has suggested that immune-related biomarkers can help in the discrimination of ovarian tumors. We aimed to assess which proteins have the most additional diagnostic value in addition to ADNEX' clinical and ultrasound predictors. Materials and methods: In this exploratory diagnostic study, 1086 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively enrolled at five oncology centers and one non-oncology center in Belgium, Italy, Czech Republic and United Kingdom between 2015 and 2019. The quantification of 33 serum proteins was carried out preoperatively, using multiplex high throughput immunoassays (Luminex) and electrochemiluminescence immuno-assay (ECLIA). Logistic regression analysis was performed for ADNEX' clinical and ultrasound predictors alone (age, maximum diameter of lesion, proportion of solid tissue, presence of >10 cyst locules, number of papillary projections, acoustic shadows and ascites) and after adding proteins. We reported the AUC for benign vs malignant, Polytomous Discrimination Index (PDI; a multiclass AUC) and pairwise AUCs for pairs of tumor types. AUCs were corrected for optimism using bootstrapping.\\nResults: After applying exclusion criteria, 932/1086 patients were eligible for analysis (474 benign, 135 borderline, 84 stage I primary invasive cancer, 208 stage II-IV primary invasive cancer, 31 secondary metastatic invasive tumors). ADNEX predictors alone had an AUC of 0.909 (95% CI 0.894-0.929) to discriminate benign from malignant tumors, and a PDI of 0.532 (0.510-0.589). HE4 yielded the highest increase in AUC (+0.026), followed by CA125 (+0.017). CA125 yielded the highest increase in PDI (+0.049), followed by HE4 (+0.036). Whereas CA125 mainly improved pairwise AUCs between different types of invasive tumors (increases between 0.020-0.165 over ADNEX alone), HE4 mainly improved pairwise AUCs for benign tumors versus stage I (+0.022) and benign tumors versus stage II-IV ovarian cancers (+0.028). CA72.4 might be useful to distinguishing secondary metastatic tumors from benign, borderline, and stage I tumors. CA15.3 might be useful to discriminate borderline tumors from stage I and stage II-IV tumors. Distinguishing stage I and borderline tumors (AUCs ≤ 0.72) and stage I and secondary metastatic tumors (AUCs ≤ 0.76) remained difficult after adding proteins. Conclusions: CA125 had the highest added value over clinical and ultrasound predictors to distinguish between the five tumor types, followed by HE4. In addition, CA72.4 and CA15.3 may further improve discrimination but findings for these proteins should be confirmed. The immune-related proteins were in general not able to discriminate the groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:ADNEX模型(附件不同恶性肿瘤评估)是预测卵巢肿瘤恶性风险(二元)和恶性类型(多类)的最佳模型。免疫系统在卵巢癌的发生和发展中起着一定的作用。初步研究表明,与免疫相关的生物标志物有助于鉴别卵巢肿瘤。我们的目的是评估除了 ADNEX 的临床和超声波预测指标外,哪些蛋白质具有最大的额外诊断价值。材料和方法:在这项探索性诊断研究中,比利时、意大利、捷克共和国和英国的五家肿瘤中心和一家非肿瘤中心在 2015 年至 2019 年间连续招募了 1086 名计划进行手术的附件包块患者。术前使用多重高通量免疫测定(Luminex)和电化学发光免疫测定(ECLIA)对33种血清蛋白进行了定量分析。我们对 ADNEX 的临床和超声预测指标(年龄、病灶最大直径、实性组织比例、是否存在 10 个囊肿位点、乳头状突起数量、声影和腹水)进行了单独的逻辑回归分析,并在加入蛋白质后进行了回归分析。我们报告了良性与恶性的AUC、多分类AUC(Polytomous Discrimination Index,多分类AUC)以及成对肿瘤类型的成对AUC。利用引导法对AUC进行了乐观校正:应用排除标准后,932/1086 例患者符合分析条件(474 例良性肿瘤、135 例边缘性肿瘤、84 例 I 期原发性浸润癌、208 例 II-IV 期原发性浸润癌、31 例继发性转移浸润性肿瘤)。单用 ADNEX 预测因子区分良性和恶性肿瘤的 AUC 为 0.909(95% CI 0.894-0.929),PDI 为 0.532(0.510-0.589)。HE4 的 AUC 增长率最高(+0.026),其次是 CA125(+0.017)。CA125 的 PDI 增长率最高(+0.049),其次是 HE4(+0.036)。CA125 主要提高了不同类型浸润性肿瘤之间的成对 AUC(比单用 ADNEX 提高了 0.020-0.165 之间),而 HE4 主要提高了良性肿瘤相对于 I 期(+0.022)和良性肿瘤相对于 II-IV 期卵巢癌(+0.028)的成对 AUC。CA72.4可能有助于区分继发性转移肿瘤与良性肿瘤、边缘性肿瘤和I期肿瘤。CA15.3可能有助于区分边缘性肿瘤与I期和II-IV期肿瘤。添加蛋白质后,仍难以区分 I 期和边缘性肿瘤(AUC ≤ 0.72)以及 I 期和继发性转移肿瘤(AUC ≤ 0.76)。结论与临床和超声预测指标相比,CA125在区分五种肿瘤类型方面的附加值最高,其次是HE4。此外,CA72.4和CA15.3可能会进一步提高区分度,但这些蛋白的研究结果有待证实。免疫相关蛋白一般无法区分不同组别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Added value of serum proteins to clinical and ultrasound information in predicting the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors
Background: The ADNEX model (Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa) is the best performing model to predict the risk of malignancy (binary) and type of malignancy (multiclass) in ovarian tumors. The immune system plays a role in the onset and progression of ovarian cancer. Preliminary research has suggested that immune-related biomarkers can help in the discrimination of ovarian tumors. We aimed to assess which proteins have the most additional diagnostic value in addition to ADNEX' clinical and ultrasound predictors. Materials and methods: In this exploratory diagnostic study, 1086 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively enrolled at five oncology centers and one non-oncology center in Belgium, Italy, Czech Republic and United Kingdom between 2015 and 2019. The quantification of 33 serum proteins was carried out preoperatively, using multiplex high throughput immunoassays (Luminex) and electrochemiluminescence immuno-assay (ECLIA). Logistic regression analysis was performed for ADNEX' clinical and ultrasound predictors alone (age, maximum diameter of lesion, proportion of solid tissue, presence of >10 cyst locules, number of papillary projections, acoustic shadows and ascites) and after adding proteins. We reported the AUC for benign vs malignant, Polytomous Discrimination Index (PDI; a multiclass AUC) and pairwise AUCs for pairs of tumor types. AUCs were corrected for optimism using bootstrapping. Results: After applying exclusion criteria, 932/1086 patients were eligible for analysis (474 benign, 135 borderline, 84 stage I primary invasive cancer, 208 stage II-IV primary invasive cancer, 31 secondary metastatic invasive tumors). ADNEX predictors alone had an AUC of 0.909 (95% CI 0.894-0.929) to discriminate benign from malignant tumors, and a PDI of 0.532 (0.510-0.589). HE4 yielded the highest increase in AUC (+0.026), followed by CA125 (+0.017). CA125 yielded the highest increase in PDI (+0.049), followed by HE4 (+0.036). Whereas CA125 mainly improved pairwise AUCs between different types of invasive tumors (increases between 0.020-0.165 over ADNEX alone), HE4 mainly improved pairwise AUCs for benign tumors versus stage I (+0.022) and benign tumors versus stage II-IV ovarian cancers (+0.028). CA72.4 might be useful to distinguishing secondary metastatic tumors from benign, borderline, and stage I tumors. CA15.3 might be useful to discriminate borderline tumors from stage I and stage II-IV tumors. Distinguishing stage I and borderline tumors (AUCs ≤ 0.72) and stage I and secondary metastatic tumors (AUCs ≤ 0.76) remained difficult after adding proteins. Conclusions: CA125 had the highest added value over clinical and ultrasound predictors to distinguish between the five tumor types, followed by HE4. In addition, CA72.4 and CA15.3 may further improve discrimination but findings for these proteins should be confirmed. The immune-related proteins were in general not able to discriminate the groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contraceptive Outcomes of the Natural Cycles Birth Control App: A Study of Canadian Women Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda Impact and factors affecting unplanned out-of-hospital birth on newborns at University Hospital compared to in-hospital born newborns Effectiveness of the modified WHO labour care guide to detect prolonged and obstructed labour among women admitted at publicly funded facilities in rural Mbarara district, Southwestern Uganda: an ambispective cohort study ACVR2A Facilitates Trophoblast Cell Invasion through TCF7/c-JUN Pathway in Pre-eclampsia Progression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1