捍卫技术:二元裁判情况下技术辅助裁判的规范性辩护

IF 1.6 Q2 ETHICS Sport Ethics and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1080/17511321.2024.2329909
Torben Kjærsgaard
{"title":"捍卫技术:二元裁判情况下技术辅助裁判的规范性辩护","authors":"Torben Kjærsgaard","doi":"10.1080/17511321.2024.2329909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses how technological official aids influence sporting competitions in terms of fairness and flow. It addresses the main arguments against technological official aids used to ass...","PeriodicalId":51786,"journal":{"name":"Sport Ethics and Philosophy","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defending technology: a normative defence of technologically assisted officiating in binary referee situations\",\"authors\":\"Torben Kjærsgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17511321.2024.2329909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses how technological official aids influence sporting competitions in terms of fairness and flow. It addresses the main arguments against technological official aids used to ass...\",\"PeriodicalId\":51786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sport Ethics and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sport Ethics and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2024.2329909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Ethics and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2024.2329909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了官方技术辅助设备如何在公平性和流程方面影响体育比赛。文章论述了反对官方技术辅助工具用于评估体育比赛公平性的主要论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defending technology: a normative defence of technologically assisted officiating in binary referee situations
This article discusses how technological official aids influence sporting competitions in terms of fairness and flow. It addresses the main arguments against technological official aids used to ass...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Book Symposium: Alfred Archer and Jake Wojtowicz’s Why it’s OK to be a Sports Fan Fair Play Principle in Esports Be a good sport: A care ethical inquiry into sport parenting Weight in sport: changing the focus from ‘weight-sensitive sports’ to risk groups of athletes The etymological evolvement and redefinition of ‘game’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1