生物信息学分析描述了免疫浸润状况,并确定了心脏移植的潜在血液生物标记物。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Transplant immunology Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.trim.2024.102036
Yujia Wang , Xiaoping Peng
{"title":"生物信息学分析描述了免疫浸润状况,并确定了心脏移植的潜在血液生物标记物。","authors":"Yujia Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Background: Cardiac allograft rejection (AR) remains a significant complication following heart transplantation. The primary objective of our study is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental mechanisms involved in AR and identify possible therapeutic targets.</p><p>Methods: We acquired the <span>GSE87301</span><svg><path></path></svg> dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. In <span>GSE87301</span><svg><path></path></svg>, a comparison was conducted on blood samples from patients with and without cardiac allograft rejection (AR and NAR) to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Enrichment analysis was conducted to identify the pathways that show significant enrichment during AR. Machine learning techniques, including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) and random forest (RF) algorithms, were employed to identify potential genes for the diagnosis of AR. The diagnostic value was evaluated using a nomogram and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, immune cell infiltration was analyzed to explore any dysregulation of immune cells in AR.</p><p>Results: A total of 114 DEGs were identified from the <span>GSE87301</span><svg><path></path></svg> dataset. These DEGs were mainly found to be enriched in pathways related to the immune system. To identify the signature genes, the LASSO and RF algorithms were used, and four genes, namely <em>ALAS2</em>, <em>HBD</em>, <em>EPB42</em>, and <em>FECH</em>, were identified. The performance of these signature genes was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, which showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values for <em>ALAS2</em>, <em>HBD</em>, <em>EPB42</em>, and <em>FECH</em> were 0.906, 0.881, 0.900, and 0.856, respectively. These findings were further confirmed in the independent datasets and clinical samples. The selection of these specific genes was made to construct a nomogram, which demonstrated excellent diagnostic ability. Additionally, the results of the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) revealed that these genes may be involved in immune cell infiltration.</p><p>Conclusion: We identified four signature genes (<em>ALAS2</em>, <em>HBD</em>, <em>EPB42</em>, and <em>FECH</em>) as potential peripheral blood diagnostic candidates for AR diagnosis. Additionally, a nomogram was constructed to aid in the diagnosis of heart transplantation. This study offers valuable insights into the identification of candidate genes for heart transplantation using peripheral blood samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23304,"journal":{"name":"Transplant immunology","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 102036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioinformatics analysis characterizes immune infiltration landscape and identifies potential blood biomarkers for heart transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Yujia Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Background: Cardiac allograft rejection (AR) remains a significant complication following heart transplantation. The primary objective of our study is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental mechanisms involved in AR and identify possible therapeutic targets.</p><p>Methods: We acquired the <span>GSE87301</span><svg><path></path></svg> dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. In <span>GSE87301</span><svg><path></path></svg>, a comparison was conducted on blood samples from patients with and without cardiac allograft rejection (AR and NAR) to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Enrichment analysis was conducted to identify the pathways that show significant enrichment during AR. Machine learning techniques, including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) and random forest (RF) algorithms, were employed to identify potential genes for the diagnosis of AR. The diagnostic value was evaluated using a nomogram and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, immune cell infiltration was analyzed to explore any dysregulation of immune cells in AR.</p><p>Results: A total of 114 DEGs were identified from the <span>GSE87301</span><svg><path></path></svg> dataset. These DEGs were mainly found to be enriched in pathways related to the immune system. To identify the signature genes, the LASSO and RF algorithms were used, and four genes, namely <em>ALAS2</em>, <em>HBD</em>, <em>EPB42</em>, and <em>FECH</em>, were identified. The performance of these signature genes was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, which showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values for <em>ALAS2</em>, <em>HBD</em>, <em>EPB42</em>, and <em>FECH</em> were 0.906, 0.881, 0.900, and 0.856, respectively. These findings were further confirmed in the independent datasets and clinical samples. The selection of these specific genes was made to construct a nomogram, which demonstrated excellent diagnostic ability. Additionally, the results of the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) revealed that these genes may be involved in immune cell infiltration.</p><p>Conclusion: We identified four signature genes (<em>ALAS2</em>, <em>HBD</em>, <em>EPB42</em>, and <em>FECH</em>) as potential peripheral blood diagnostic candidates for AR diagnosis. Additionally, a nomogram was constructed to aid in the diagnosis of heart transplantation. This study offers valuable insights into the identification of candidate genes for heart transplantation using peripheral blood samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant immunology\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966327424000522\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966327424000522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏同种异体移植排斥反应(AR)仍然是心脏移植后的一个重要并发症。我们研究的主要目的是全面了解参与 AR 的基本机制,并确定可能的治疗靶点:我们从基因表达总库(Gene Expression Omnibus)数据库中获得了 GSE87301 数据集。在 GSE87301 数据集中,我们对心脏同种异体移植排斥反应(AR 和 NAR)患者和无排斥反应患者的血液样本进行了比较,以检测差异表达基因(DEGs)。进行了富集分析,以确定在 AR 期间表现出显著富集的通路。采用机器学习技术,包括最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归(LASSO)算法和随机森林(RF)算法,来识别诊断AR的潜在基因。诊断价值采用提名图和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)进行评估。此外,还对免疫细胞浸润进行了分析,以探讨AR中免疫细胞的失调情况:结果:从 GSE87301 数据集中共鉴定出 114 个 DEGs。结果:从 GSE87301 数据集中共鉴定出 114 个 DEGs,这些 DEGs 主要富集在与免疫系统相关的通路中。为了确定特征基因,研究人员使用了 LASSO 和 RF 算法,并确定了四个基因,即 ALAS2、HBD、EPB42 和 FECH。接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析表明,ALAS2、HBD、EPB42和FECH的曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.906、0.881、0.900和0.856。这些发现在独立数据集和临床样本中得到了进一步证实。选择这些特定基因构建的提名图显示了出色的诊断能力。此外,单样本基因组富集分析(ssGSEA)结果显示,这些基因可能参与了免疫细胞浸润:结论:我们确定了四个特征基因(ALAS2、HBD、EPB42 和 FECH)作为诊断 AR 的潜在外周血候选基因。此外,我们还构建了一个提名图来帮助诊断心脏移植。这项研究为利用外周血样本鉴定心脏移植候选基因提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bioinformatics analysis characterizes immune infiltration landscape and identifies potential blood biomarkers for heart transplantation

Background: Cardiac allograft rejection (AR) remains a significant complication following heart transplantation. The primary objective of our study is to gain a comprehensive understanding of the fundamental mechanisms involved in AR and identify possible therapeutic targets.

Methods: We acquired the GSE87301 dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. In GSE87301, a comparison was conducted on blood samples from patients with and without cardiac allograft rejection (AR and NAR) to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Enrichment analysis was conducted to identify the pathways that show significant enrichment during AR. Machine learning techniques, including the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) and random forest (RF) algorithms, were employed to identify potential genes for the diagnosis of AR. The diagnostic value was evaluated using a nomogram and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, immune cell infiltration was analyzed to explore any dysregulation of immune cells in AR.

Results: A total of 114 DEGs were identified from the GSE87301 dataset. These DEGs were mainly found to be enriched in pathways related to the immune system. To identify the signature genes, the LASSO and RF algorithms were used, and four genes, namely ALAS2, HBD, EPB42, and FECH, were identified. The performance of these signature genes was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, which showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values for ALAS2, HBD, EPB42, and FECH were 0.906, 0.881, 0.900, and 0.856, respectively. These findings were further confirmed in the independent datasets and clinical samples. The selection of these specific genes was made to construct a nomogram, which demonstrated excellent diagnostic ability. Additionally, the results of the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) revealed that these genes may be involved in immune cell infiltration.

Conclusion: We identified four signature genes (ALAS2, HBD, EPB42, and FECH) as potential peripheral blood diagnostic candidates for AR diagnosis. Additionally, a nomogram was constructed to aid in the diagnosis of heart transplantation. This study offers valuable insights into the identification of candidate genes for heart transplantation using peripheral blood samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant immunology
Transplant immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Transplant Immunology will publish up-to-date information on all aspects of the broad field it encompasses. The journal will be directed at (basic) scientists, tissue typers, transplant physicians and surgeons, and research and data on all immunological aspects of organ-, tissue- and (haematopoietic) stem cell transplantation are of potential interest to the readers of Transplant Immunology. Original papers, Review articles and Hypotheses will be considered for publication and submitted manuscripts will be rapidly peer-reviewed and published. They will be judged on the basis of scientific merit, originality, timeliness and quality.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in renal transplant recipients: A single-center experience. Utilization of kidneys from tuberculosis-infected donors in renal transplantation: A case report. Cyclosporine's immunosuppressive effects, entwined toxicity, and clinical modulations of an organ transplant drug. Identification of mitophagy-related gene signatures for predicting delayed graft function and renal allograft loss post-kidney transplantation. Potential of new 250-nautical mile concentric circle allocation system for improving the donor/recipient HLA matching: Development of new matching algorithm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1