{"title":"麻醉后护理病房康复质量评分(QoR-PACU2)的心理计量学评估--前瞻性验证研究。","authors":"Ursula Kahl , Alena Boehm , Linda Krause , Regine Klinger , Kaloyan Stoimenov , Christian Zöllner , Lili Plümer , Marlene Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To date, there is no instrument to adequately assess self-reported quality of recovery (QoR) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). We previously developed the QoR-PACU, a 13-item questionnaire specifically applicable to the PACU. The feasibility, acceptance, and validity of the QoR-PACU were promising. However, measures of reliability were slightly lower than expected.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We modified the QoR-PACU and evaluated its psychometric properties in a cohort of adult patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia. The modified QoR-PACU (termed QoR-PACU<sub>2</sub>) was administered before surgery and postoperatively in the PACU at the time of the decision to discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 307 patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative QoR-PACU<sub>2</sub> sum scores differed across categories of sex, perioperative and surgical risk, and modes of airway management. The duration of anesthesia and surgery, maximum pain intensity and analgesic requirement in the PACU, and length of PACU stay were all inversely correlated with QoR in the PACU. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.66–0.75). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.70–0.94, <em>p</em> < 0.001) for intra-rater reliability (<em>n</em> = 24) and 0.94 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.97, <em>p</em> < 0.001) for inter-rater reliability (<em>n</em> = 31). Cohen’s effect size was 0.68 and the standardized response mean was 0.57.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The QoR-PACU<sub>2</sub> assesses self-reported QoR after surgery in the PACU. Measures of feasibility, validity, and reliability were consistently high. Measures of responsiveness were moderate, which might be attributable to the heterogeneity of the study population. Future studies should include aspects of ethnicity and cross-cultural applicability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 3","pages":"Article 101380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000389/pdfft?md5=49b33d0fe230a44f4650f4416c365246&pid=1-s2.0-S2352556824000389-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of the modified quality of recovery score for the postanaesthesia care unit (QoR-PACU2)—A prospective validation study\",\"authors\":\"Ursula Kahl , Alena Boehm , Linda Krause , Regine Klinger , Kaloyan Stoimenov , Christian Zöllner , Lili Plümer , Marlene Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To date, there is no instrument to adequately assess self-reported quality of recovery (QoR) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). We previously developed the QoR-PACU, a 13-item questionnaire specifically applicable to the PACU. The feasibility, acceptance, and validity of the QoR-PACU were promising. However, measures of reliability were slightly lower than expected.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We modified the QoR-PACU and evaluated its psychometric properties in a cohort of adult patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia. The modified QoR-PACU (termed QoR-PACU<sub>2</sub>) was administered before surgery and postoperatively in the PACU at the time of the decision to discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 307 patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative QoR-PACU<sub>2</sub> sum scores differed across categories of sex, perioperative and surgical risk, and modes of airway management. The duration of anesthesia and surgery, maximum pain intensity and analgesic requirement in the PACU, and length of PACU stay were all inversely correlated with QoR in the PACU. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.66–0.75). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.70–0.94, <em>p</em> < 0.001) for intra-rater reliability (<em>n</em> = 24) and 0.94 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.97, <em>p</em> < 0.001) for inter-rater reliability (<em>n</em> = 31). Cohen’s effect size was 0.68 and the standardized response mean was 0.57.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The QoR-PACU<sub>2</sub> assesses self-reported QoR after surgery in the PACU. Measures of feasibility, validity, and reliability were consistently high. Measures of responsiveness were moderate, which might be attributable to the heterogeneity of the study population. Future studies should include aspects of ethnicity and cross-cultural applicability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000389/pdfft?md5=49b33d0fe230a44f4650f4416c365246&pid=1-s2.0-S2352556824000389-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychometric evaluation of the modified quality of recovery score for the postanaesthesia care unit (QoR-PACU2)—A prospective validation study
Background
To date, there is no instrument to adequately assess self-reported quality of recovery (QoR) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). We previously developed the QoR-PACU, a 13-item questionnaire specifically applicable to the PACU. The feasibility, acceptance, and validity of the QoR-PACU were promising. However, measures of reliability were slightly lower than expected.
Methods
We modified the QoR-PACU and evaluated its psychometric properties in a cohort of adult patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia. The modified QoR-PACU (termed QoR-PACU2) was administered before surgery and postoperatively in the PACU at the time of the decision to discharge.
Results
A total of 307 patients were included in the final analysis. Postoperative QoR-PACU2 sum scores differed across categories of sex, perioperative and surgical risk, and modes of airway management. The duration of anesthesia and surgery, maximum pain intensity and analgesic requirement in the PACU, and length of PACU stay were all inversely correlated with QoR in the PACU. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.66–0.75). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.70–0.94, p < 0.001) for intra-rater reliability (n = 24) and 0.94 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.97, p < 0.001) for inter-rater reliability (n = 31). Cohen’s effect size was 0.68 and the standardized response mean was 0.57.
Conclusion
The QoR-PACU2 assesses self-reported QoR after surgery in the PACU. Measures of feasibility, validity, and reliability were consistently high. Measures of responsiveness were moderate, which might be attributable to the heterogeneity of the study population. Future studies should include aspects of ethnicity and cross-cultural applicability.
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.