Nienke Spronk , Madeleine SQ. Kortenhorst , Jasmijn A. van Balveren
{"title":"我们准备好在胎儿血液采样中广泛使用乳酸POCT了吗?新型statstrip POCT分析仪的分析和临床验证","authors":"Nienke Spronk , Madeleine SQ. Kortenhorst , Jasmijn A. van Balveren","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Currently, pH values are used in fetal scalp blood sampling as a parameter to rule out fetal distress during the delivery. Due to a high number of pre-analytical errors in pH measurements, lactate measurement is already extensively examined as an alternative. Our objectives were to confirm the analytical performance of the StatStrip lactate POCT analyzer and to compare pH and lactate as a marker of fetal distress.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p><em>and methods</em>: Fetal blood scalp, umbilical and arterial blood test results (n = 100) were analyzed to compare the current POC blood gas analyzer including lactate (iSTAT-1) with the new POCT analyzer (StatStrip) to test the analytical performance. Furthermore, in all fetal scalp blood tests with a lactate en pH measurement from 2021 to 2023, clinical delivery data was collected to perform a clinical verification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lactate concentration on the StatStrip analyzer correlated well with the iSTAT-1 (Pearson's r ≥ 0.95). 73 Fetal scalp blood tests showed 18% discrepant results when comparing pH and lactate with regard to fetal distress and consequent delivery intervention. Lactate showed more false positive results than pH (4 versus 1), but no false negatives as opposed to pH (0 versus 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lactate Statstrip and iSTAT-1 POCT analyzers were analytically equivalent. The clinical verification study showed that lactate is a good predictor of fetal distress, although more false positive results were found in our limited dataset. However, unnecessary interventions due to failed pH measurements might be prevented when a lactate measurement is introduced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210/pdfft?md5=264c8d80341769c182b509e0f7e6321b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are we ready for widespread implementation of lactate POCT in fetal blood sampling? An analytical and clinical verification of the novel statstrip POCT analyzer\",\"authors\":\"Nienke Spronk , Madeleine SQ. Kortenhorst , Jasmijn A. van Balveren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Currently, pH values are used in fetal scalp blood sampling as a parameter to rule out fetal distress during the delivery. Due to a high number of pre-analytical errors in pH measurements, lactate measurement is already extensively examined as an alternative. Our objectives were to confirm the analytical performance of the StatStrip lactate POCT analyzer and to compare pH and lactate as a marker of fetal distress.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p><em>and methods</em>: Fetal blood scalp, umbilical and arterial blood test results (n = 100) were analyzed to compare the current POC blood gas analyzer including lactate (iSTAT-1) with the new POCT analyzer (StatStrip) to test the analytical performance. Furthermore, in all fetal scalp blood tests with a lactate en pH measurement from 2021 to 2023, clinical delivery data was collected to perform a clinical verification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The lactate concentration on the StatStrip analyzer correlated well with the iSTAT-1 (Pearson's r ≥ 0.95). 73 Fetal scalp blood tests showed 18% discrepant results when comparing pH and lactate with regard to fetal distress and consequent delivery intervention. Lactate showed more false positive results than pH (4 versus 1), but no false negatives as opposed to pH (0 versus 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lactate Statstrip and iSTAT-1 POCT analyzers were analytically equivalent. The clinical verification study showed that lactate is a good predictor of fetal distress, although more false positive results were found in our limited dataset. However, unnecessary interventions due to failed pH measurements might be prevented when a lactate measurement is introduced.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210/pdfft?md5=264c8d80341769c182b509e0f7e6321b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000210-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are we ready for widespread implementation of lactate POCT in fetal blood sampling? An analytical and clinical verification of the novel statstrip POCT analyzer
Objectives
Currently, pH values are used in fetal scalp blood sampling as a parameter to rule out fetal distress during the delivery. Due to a high number of pre-analytical errors in pH measurements, lactate measurement is already extensively examined as an alternative. Our objectives were to confirm the analytical performance of the StatStrip lactate POCT analyzer and to compare pH and lactate as a marker of fetal distress.
Design
and methods: Fetal blood scalp, umbilical and arterial blood test results (n = 100) were analyzed to compare the current POC blood gas analyzer including lactate (iSTAT-1) with the new POCT analyzer (StatStrip) to test the analytical performance. Furthermore, in all fetal scalp blood tests with a lactate en pH measurement from 2021 to 2023, clinical delivery data was collected to perform a clinical verification.
Results
The lactate concentration on the StatStrip analyzer correlated well with the iSTAT-1 (Pearson's r ≥ 0.95). 73 Fetal scalp blood tests showed 18% discrepant results when comparing pH and lactate with regard to fetal distress and consequent delivery intervention. Lactate showed more false positive results than pH (4 versus 1), but no false negatives as opposed to pH (0 versus 1).
Conclusions
The lactate Statstrip and iSTAT-1 POCT analyzers were analytically equivalent. The clinical verification study showed that lactate is a good predictor of fetal distress, although more false positive results were found in our limited dataset. However, unnecessary interventions due to failed pH measurements might be prevented when a lactate measurement is introduced.
期刊介绍:
Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.