Yuta OHASHI, Ryota TSUCHIYA, Masahisa ISHII, Makio HAYASHI
{"title":"利用热箱和热平衡分析,开发评估温室透气隔热屏隔热能力的方法","authors":"Yuta OHASHI, Ryota TSUCHIYA, Masahisa ISHII, Makio HAYASHI","doi":"10.2480/agrmet.d-23-00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p> In this study, we developed a method for evaluating the heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens. Heat transfer through breathable thermal screens involves radiation, convection, conduction, and ventilation. Of these, ventilation heat transfer is unique to breathable thermal screens, and warrants further understanding. Therefore, we evaluated the heat insulation capacity of aluminized (Screen_Al) and polyester (Screen_Poly) thermal screens. Ventilation heat transfer coefficient (<i>k<sub>ven</sub></i>), heat transfer coefficient of the nonventilated part of the thermal screen (<i>k</i>), and heat transfer coefficient including all heat transfer forms (<i>k<sub>all</sub></i>) were measured via a hot-box with heat balance analysis. The <i>k<sub>ven</sub></i> of Screen_Al (1.5 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) was higher than that of Screen_Poly (1.3 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C<sup>-1</sup>) because the ventilation rate of Screen_Al (4.2 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>) was higher than that of Screen_Poly (3.8 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>). The <i>k</i> of Screen_Al (4.1 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) was lower than that of Screen_Poly (6.0 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) because of the higher longwave radiation reflectance of Screen_Al. Finally, the <i>k<sub>all</sub></i> of Screen_Al (5.7 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) was lower than that of Screen_Poly (7.2 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>). In conclusion, we successfully demonstrated a method by which the heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens can be evaluated.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":56074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology","volume":"163 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a method for evaluating heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens for greenhouses using a hot-box with heat balance analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuta OHASHI, Ryota TSUCHIYA, Masahisa ISHII, Makio HAYASHI\",\"doi\":\"10.2480/agrmet.d-23-00025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"</p><p> In this study, we developed a method for evaluating the heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens. Heat transfer through breathable thermal screens involves radiation, convection, conduction, and ventilation. Of these, ventilation heat transfer is unique to breathable thermal screens, and warrants further understanding. Therefore, we evaluated the heat insulation capacity of aluminized (Screen_Al) and polyester (Screen_Poly) thermal screens. Ventilation heat transfer coefficient (<i>k<sub>ven</sub></i>), heat transfer coefficient of the nonventilated part of the thermal screen (<i>k</i>), and heat transfer coefficient including all heat transfer forms (<i>k<sub>all</sub></i>) were measured via a hot-box with heat balance analysis. The <i>k<sub>ven</sub></i> of Screen_Al (1.5 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) was higher than that of Screen_Poly (1.3 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C<sup>-1</sup>) because the ventilation rate of Screen_Al (4.2 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>) was higher than that of Screen_Poly (3.8 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-2</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>). The <i>k</i> of Screen_Al (4.1 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) was lower than that of Screen_Poly (6.0 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) because of the higher longwave radiation reflectance of Screen_Al. Finally, the <i>k<sub>all</sub></i> of Screen_Al (5.7 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>) was lower than that of Screen_Poly (7.2 W m<sup>-2</sup> °C <sup>-1</sup>). In conclusion, we successfully demonstrated a method by which the heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens can be evaluated.</p>\\n<p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.d-23-00025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.d-23-00025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这项研究中,我们开发了一种评估透气隔热屏隔热能力的方法。透气隔热屏的热传递包括辐射、对流、传导和通风。其中,通风传热是透气隔热屏所特有的,需要进一步了解。因此,我们评估了镀铝(Screen_Al)和聚酯(Screen_Poly)隔热屏的隔热能力。通过热箱和热平衡分析测量了通风传热系数(kven)、隔热屏非通风部分的传热系数(k)和包括所有传热形式的传热系数(kall)。Screen_Al 的 kven(1.5 W m-2 ℃-1)高于 Screen_Poly(1.3 W m-2 ℃-1),因为 Screen_Al 的通风率(4.2 m3 m-2 h-1)高于 Screen_Poly(3.8 m3 m-2 h-1)。由于铝幕的长波辐射反射率较高,因此铝幕的 k 值(4.1 W m-2 ℃-1)低于聚合幕(6.0 W m-2 ℃-1)。最后,Screen_Al 的 kall 值(5.7 W m-2 ℃-1)低于 Screen_Poly(7.2 W m-2 ℃-1)。总之,我们成功地展示了一种可以评估透气隔热屏隔热能力的方法。
Development of a method for evaluating heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens for greenhouses using a hot-box with heat balance analysis
In this study, we developed a method for evaluating the heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens. Heat transfer through breathable thermal screens involves radiation, convection, conduction, and ventilation. Of these, ventilation heat transfer is unique to breathable thermal screens, and warrants further understanding. Therefore, we evaluated the heat insulation capacity of aluminized (Screen_Al) and polyester (Screen_Poly) thermal screens. Ventilation heat transfer coefficient (kven), heat transfer coefficient of the nonventilated part of the thermal screen (k), and heat transfer coefficient including all heat transfer forms (kall) were measured via a hot-box with heat balance analysis. The kven of Screen_Al (1.5 W m-2 °C -1) was higher than that of Screen_Poly (1.3 W m-2 °C-1) because the ventilation rate of Screen_Al (4.2 m3 m-2 h-1) was higher than that of Screen_Poly (3.8 m3 m-2 h-1). The k of Screen_Al (4.1 W m-2 °C -1) was lower than that of Screen_Poly (6.0 W m-2 °C -1) because of the higher longwave radiation reflectance of Screen_Al. Finally, the kall of Screen_Al (5.7 W m-2 °C -1) was lower than that of Screen_Poly (7.2 W m-2 °C -1). In conclusion, we successfully demonstrated a method by which the heat insulation capacity of breathable thermal screens can be evaluated.
期刊介绍:
For over 70 years, the Journal of Agricultural Meteorology has published original papers and review articles on the science of physical and biological processes in natural and managed ecosystems. Published topics include, but are not limited to, weather disasters, local climate, micrometeorology, climate change, soil environment, plant phenology, plant response to environmental change, crop growth and yield prediction, instrumentation, and environmental control across a wide range of managed ecosystems, from open fields to greenhouses and plant factories.