关于如何对糖尿病患者足部溃疡进行分类的播客(IWGDF 分类指南 2023 年更新版)。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Diabetes Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s13300-023-01521-2
Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Fran Game
{"title":"关于如何对糖尿病患者足部溃疡进行分类的播客(IWGDF 分类指南 2023 年更新版)。","authors":"Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Fran Game","doi":"10.1007/s13300-023-01521-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this podcast, we present the result of the 2023 scheduled update of the 2019 guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) addressing the use of systems to classify foot ulcers in people with diabetes in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These guidelines were based on a systematic review of the available literature that identified 28 classifications addressed in 149 articles and, subsequently, expert opinion using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. We first assessed the value of each system independently and, in the second stage, chose the best one or two to be used in each clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recommend (1) for communication among healthcare professionals to use the Site, Ischaemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial infection, Area, Depth (SINBAD) classification (first option) or consider using Wound, Ischaemia, foot Infection (WIfI) system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise are available and it is considered feasible) and in each case the individual variables that compose the systems should be described rather than a total score; (2) for predicting the outcome of an ulcer in a specific individual: no existing system could be recommended; (3) for characterising a person with an infected ulcer: the use of the IDSA (Infection Diseases Society of America)/IWGDF (first option) classification or consider using the WIfI system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise are available and it is considered as feasible); (4) for characterising a person with peripheral artery disease: consider using the WIfI system as a means to stratify healing likelihood and amputation risk; (5) for the audit of outcome(s) of populations: the use of the SINBAD score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there is no classification that fits all purposes, it is crucial that healthcare professionals standardize the way they characterise diabetes-related foot ulcers and guide their decision-making process by using validated classification systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Podcast on How to Classify Foot Ulcers in People with Diabetes (2023 Update of the IWGDF Guidelines on Classification).\",\"authors\":\"Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Fran Game\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13300-023-01521-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this podcast, we present the result of the 2023 scheduled update of the 2019 guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) addressing the use of systems to classify foot ulcers in people with diabetes in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These guidelines were based on a systematic review of the available literature that identified 28 classifications addressed in 149 articles and, subsequently, expert opinion using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. We first assessed the value of each system independently and, in the second stage, chose the best one or two to be used in each clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recommend (1) for communication among healthcare professionals to use the Site, Ischaemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial infection, Area, Depth (SINBAD) classification (first option) or consider using Wound, Ischaemia, foot Infection (WIfI) system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise are available and it is considered feasible) and in each case the individual variables that compose the systems should be described rather than a total score; (2) for predicting the outcome of an ulcer in a specific individual: no existing system could be recommended; (3) for characterising a person with an infected ulcer: the use of the IDSA (Infection Diseases Society of America)/IWGDF (first option) classification or consider using the WIfI system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise are available and it is considered as feasible); (4) for characterising a person with peripheral artery disease: consider using the WIfI system as a means to stratify healing likelihood and amputation risk; (5) for the audit of outcome(s) of populations: the use of the SINBAD score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there is no classification that fits all purposes, it is crucial that healthcare professionals standardize the way they characterise diabetes-related foot ulcers and guide their decision-making process by using validated classification systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01521-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01521-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在本期播客中,我们介绍了国际糖尿病足工作组(IWGDF)2019 年指南 2023 年计划更新的结果,其中涉及在常规临床实践中使用系统对糖尿病患者足部溃疡进行分类的问题:这些指南基于对现有文献的系统性回顾,该回顾确定了 149 篇文章中涉及的 28 种分类方法,随后采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级 (GRADE) 方法对专家意见进行了评估。我们首先独立评估了每种系统的价值,然后在第二阶段选择了最好的一种或两种系统用于每种临床情况:我们建议:(1)在医护人员之间进行交流时,使用部位、缺血、神经病变、细菌感染、面积、深度(SINBAD)分类法(第一方案),或考虑使用伤口、缺血、足部感染(WIfI)系统(备选方案,在具备所需设备和专业知识水平且认为可行的情况下),在每种情况下,都应描述组成系统的各个变量,而不是总分;(2)在预测特定个体的溃疡结果时,没有现成的系统可供选择;(3)在预测特定个体的溃疡结果时,没有现成的系统可供选择;(4)在预测特定个体的溃疡结果时,没有现成的系统可供选择;(5)在预测特定个体的溃疡结果时,没有现成的系统可供选择:无法推荐任何现有系统;(3) 用于描述感染性溃疡患者的特征:使用 IDSA(美国感染病协会)/IWGDF(第一方案)分类法,或考虑使用 WIfI 系统(备选方案,在具备所需设备和专业知识水平且认为可行的情况下);(4) 用于描述外周动脉疾病患者的特征:考虑使用 WIfI 系统(备选方案,在具备所需设备和专业知识水平且认为可行的情况下);(5) 用于描述外周动脉疾病患者的特征:考虑使用 WIfI 系统(备选方案,在具备所需设备和专业知识水平且认为可行的情况下):考虑使用 WIfI 系统作为对痊愈可能性和截肢风险进行分层的一种手段;(5) 对人群的结果进行审计:使用 SINBAD 评分。结论虽然没有适合所有目的的分类方法,但医护人员必须使用经过验证的分类系统来规范糖尿病相关足部溃疡的定性方法并指导决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Podcast on How to Classify Foot Ulcers in People with Diabetes (2023 Update of the IWGDF Guidelines on Classification).

Introduction: In this podcast, we present the result of the 2023 scheduled update of the 2019 guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) addressing the use of systems to classify foot ulcers in people with diabetes in routine clinical practice.

Methods: These guidelines were based on a systematic review of the available literature that identified 28 classifications addressed in 149 articles and, subsequently, expert opinion using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. We first assessed the value of each system independently and, in the second stage, chose the best one or two to be used in each clinical scenario.

Results: We recommend (1) for communication among healthcare professionals to use the Site, Ischaemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial infection, Area, Depth (SINBAD) classification (first option) or consider using Wound, Ischaemia, foot Infection (WIfI) system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise are available and it is considered feasible) and in each case the individual variables that compose the systems should be described rather than a total score; (2) for predicting the outcome of an ulcer in a specific individual: no existing system could be recommended; (3) for characterising a person with an infected ulcer: the use of the IDSA (Infection Diseases Society of America)/IWGDF (first option) classification or consider using the WIfI system (alternative option, when the required equipment and level of expertise are available and it is considered as feasible); (4) for characterising a person with peripheral artery disease: consider using the WIfI system as a means to stratify healing likelihood and amputation risk; (5) for the audit of outcome(s) of populations: the use of the SINBAD score.

Conclusion: Although there is no classification that fits all purposes, it is crucial that healthcare professionals standardize the way they characterise diabetes-related foot ulcers and guide their decision-making process by using validated classification systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Therapy Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Treatment Patterns and Glycaemic Control Between 2015 and 2019 in Tianjin, China: A Real-World Study of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Safety and Effectiveness of Concomitant iGlarLixi and SGLT-2i Use in People with T2D During Ramadan Fasting: A SoliRam Study Sub-analysis. The Effects of Imeglimin on Muscle Strength in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study. Correction to: Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide in Asians and Non-Asians with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. An SMS-Guided Basal Insulin Titration in People with Type 2 Diabetes New on Insulin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1