股动脉插管与股动脉直径之比可预测股动脉插管微创心脏手术中潜在的下肢缺血。

Takuya Nishijima, Tomoki Ushijima, Yoshifumi Fuke, Meikun Kan-O, Satoshi Kimura, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akira Shiose
{"title":"股动脉插管与股动脉直径之比可预测股动脉插管微创心脏手术中潜在的下肢缺血。","authors":"Takuya Nishijima, Tomoki Ushijima, Yoshifumi Fuke, Meikun Kan-O, Satoshi Kimura, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akira Shiose","doi":"10.1177/15569845241237212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lower-limb ischemia is a complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery with femoral cannulation. Herein, we verified our strategy using distal perfusion cannulation (DPC) against this complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed 91 cases of aortic valve replacement with femoral cannulation between January 2019 and March 2023. DPC was applied when lower-limb tissue oxygenation index declined by ≥20%. The cannula to femoral artery diameter ratio (C/FA) was calculated by dividing the cannula size (Fr) divided by 3 by the femoral artery inner diameter (mm). Postoperative maximum creatinine kinase (CK<sub>max</sub>), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH<sub>max</sub>), and lactate levels were analyzed, and univariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were employed to determine DPC predictors and the cutoff C/FA for DPC, respectively. Patients without DPC were divided into 2 subgroups based on the cutoff C/FA for further comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DPC was required in 9 patients. Symptomatic ischemia was not observed. All laboratory data were similar in the DPC and non-DPC groups. C/FA was significantly associated with DPC (odds ratio = 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.47, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and the cutoff C/FA was 0.70 (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.80). In the non-DPC group, CK<sub>max</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.027) and LDH<sub>max</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.041) were significantly higher in patients with C/FA ≥0.7 (<i>n</i> = 16) than in those with C/FA <0.7 (<i>n</i> = 66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our strategy for preventing symptomatic ischemia is reasonable and could be almost achieved without DPC when C/FA is <0.7. C/FA also predicts asymptomatic potential ischemia, and proactive DPC is preferable when C/FA is ≥0.7.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannula to Femoral Artery Diameter Ratio Predicts Potential Lower-Limb Ischemia in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery With Femoral Cannulation.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Nishijima, Tomoki Ushijima, Yoshifumi Fuke, Meikun Kan-O, Satoshi Kimura, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akira Shiose\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15569845241237212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lower-limb ischemia is a complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery with femoral cannulation. Herein, we verified our strategy using distal perfusion cannulation (DPC) against this complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed 91 cases of aortic valve replacement with femoral cannulation between January 2019 and March 2023. DPC was applied when lower-limb tissue oxygenation index declined by ≥20%. The cannula to femoral artery diameter ratio (C/FA) was calculated by dividing the cannula size (Fr) divided by 3 by the femoral artery inner diameter (mm). Postoperative maximum creatinine kinase (CK<sub>max</sub>), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH<sub>max</sub>), and lactate levels were analyzed, and univariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were employed to determine DPC predictors and the cutoff C/FA for DPC, respectively. Patients without DPC were divided into 2 subgroups based on the cutoff C/FA for further comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DPC was required in 9 patients. Symptomatic ischemia was not observed. All laboratory data were similar in the DPC and non-DPC groups. C/FA was significantly associated with DPC (odds ratio = 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.47, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and the cutoff C/FA was 0.70 (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.80). In the non-DPC group, CK<sub>max</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.027) and LDH<sub>max</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.041) were significantly higher in patients with C/FA ≥0.7 (<i>n</i> = 16) than in those with C/FA <0.7 (<i>n</i> = 66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our strategy for preventing symptomatic ischemia is reasonable and could be almost achieved without DPC when C/FA is <0.7. C/FA also predicts asymptomatic potential ischemia, and proactive DPC is preferable when C/FA is ≥0.7.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"161-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845241237212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845241237212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下肢缺血是股动脉插管微创心脏手术的并发症之一。在此,我们针对这一并发症验证了我们的远端灌注插管(DPC)策略:我们回顾性评估了 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月期间 91 例股动脉插管主动脉瓣置换术病例。当下肢组织氧合指数下降≥20%时应用DPC。插管与股动脉直径比(C/FA)的计算方法是插管尺寸(Fr)除以股动脉内径(mm)再除以3。对术后最大肌酸激酶(CKmax)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDHmax)和乳酸水平进行了分析,并采用单变量逻辑回归和接收者操作特征曲线分析分别确定了DPC预测因素和DPC的临界C/FA。根据 C/FA 临界值将无 DPC 的患者分为两个亚组,以便进一步比较:结果:9 名患者需要进行 DPC。结果:9 名患者需要进行 DPC,未观察到症状性缺血。DPC 组和非 DPC 组的所有实验室数据相似。C/FA与DPC明显相关(比值比=1.27,95%置信区间:1.09至1.47,P=0.002),C/FA的临界值为0.70(灵敏度=0.89,特异性=0.80)。在非DPC组中,CKmax(P = 0.027)和LDHmax(P = 0.041)在C/FA≥0.7(n = 16)的患者中明显高于C/FA n = 66的患者:我们预防症状性心肌缺血的策略是合理的,当 C/FA 为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cannula to Femoral Artery Diameter Ratio Predicts Potential Lower-Limb Ischemia in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery With Femoral Cannulation.

Objective: Lower-limb ischemia is a complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery with femoral cannulation. Herein, we verified our strategy using distal perfusion cannulation (DPC) against this complication.

Methods: We retrospectively assessed 91 cases of aortic valve replacement with femoral cannulation between January 2019 and March 2023. DPC was applied when lower-limb tissue oxygenation index declined by ≥20%. The cannula to femoral artery diameter ratio (C/FA) was calculated by dividing the cannula size (Fr) divided by 3 by the femoral artery inner diameter (mm). Postoperative maximum creatinine kinase (CKmax), lactate dehydrogenase (LDHmax), and lactate levels were analyzed, and univariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were employed to determine DPC predictors and the cutoff C/FA for DPC, respectively. Patients without DPC were divided into 2 subgroups based on the cutoff C/FA for further comparisons.

Results: DPC was required in 9 patients. Symptomatic ischemia was not observed. All laboratory data were similar in the DPC and non-DPC groups. C/FA was significantly associated with DPC (odds ratio = 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.47, P = 0.002), and the cutoff C/FA was 0.70 (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.80). In the non-DPC group, CKmax (P = 0.027) and LDHmax (P = 0.041) were significantly higher in patients with C/FA ≥0.7 (n = 16) than in those with C/FA <0.7 (n = 66).

Conclusions: Our strategy for preventing symptomatic ischemia is reasonable and could be almost achieved without DPC when C/FA is <0.7. C/FA also predicts asymptomatic potential ischemia, and proactive DPC is preferable when C/FA is ≥0.7.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery is the first journal whose main mission is to disseminate information specifically about advances in technology and techniques that lead to less invasive treatment of cardiothoracic and vascular disease. It delivers cutting edge original research, reviews, essays, case reports, and editorials from the pioneers and experts in the field of minimally invasive cardiothoracic and vascular disease, including biomedical engineers. Also included are papers presented at the annual ISMICS meeting. Official Journal of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery
期刊最新文献
Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Patient-Level Data. The 10 Commandments for State-of-the-Art Imaging of the Proximal Thoracic Aorta. Robot-Assisted Atrial Septal Defect Closure Via the Left Atrium: Dual Case Reports. The 10 Commandments of Endo-Bentall Repair. Innovative Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technique: Early Experience of Inverted Spiral Closure Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1