自体与辐照自体肋软骨移植在鼻整形术中的效果。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2023.0334
Virginia E Drake, Connor Smith, Mariel O Watkins, Shannon F Rudy, Andrew W Joseph, Chaz L Stucken, Michael J Brenner, Jennifer C Kim, Jeffrey S Moyer
{"title":"自体与辐照自体肋软骨移植在鼻整形术中的效果。","authors":"Virginia E Drake, Connor Smith, Mariel O Watkins, Shannon F Rudy, Andrew W Joseph, Chaz L Stucken, Michael J Brenner, Jennifer C Kim, Jeffrey S Moyer","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2023.0334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Autologous costal cartilage (ACC) and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are commonly used in septorhinoplasty when there is insufficient septal cartilage for grafting. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent septorhinoplasty with either ACC or IHCC as measured by rates of infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent rhinoplasty with ACC or IHCC at a single academic institution was performed. Demographic data, surgical details, antibiotic use, and outcomes, including surgical duration, infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate, were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> One hundred forty-three patients were identified. The median age was 48 years (interquartile range: 35-57.5) and 62.2% (<i>n</i> = 89) were female, 61 patients (42.7%) underwent ACC, and 82 (57.3%) IHCC. Revision rate in both groups was similar (ACC = 14.8%, IHCC = 14.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.98). There was no difference in infection rate (ACC = 4.9%, IHCC = 3.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.71). Postoperative deformity and nasal obstruction were the most common indications for revision surgery. Surgical time was shorter with IHCC (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (±25) for ACC, and 16 months (±12) for IHCC. <b>Conclusions:</b> ACC and IHCC are similar in terms of effectiveness and safety in septorhinoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"575-581"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Autologous Versus Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Graft in Rhinoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Virginia E Drake, Connor Smith, Mariel O Watkins, Shannon F Rudy, Andrew W Joseph, Chaz L Stucken, Michael J Brenner, Jennifer C Kim, Jeffrey S Moyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpsam.2023.0334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Autologous costal cartilage (ACC) and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are commonly used in septorhinoplasty when there is insufficient septal cartilage for grafting. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent septorhinoplasty with either ACC or IHCC as measured by rates of infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent rhinoplasty with ACC or IHCC at a single academic institution was performed. Demographic data, surgical details, antibiotic use, and outcomes, including surgical duration, infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate, were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> One hundred forty-three patients were identified. The median age was 48 years (interquartile range: 35-57.5) and 62.2% (<i>n</i> = 89) were female, 61 patients (42.7%) underwent ACC, and 82 (57.3%) IHCC. Revision rate in both groups was similar (ACC = 14.8%, IHCC = 14.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.98). There was no difference in infection rate (ACC = 4.9%, IHCC = 3.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.71). Postoperative deformity and nasal obstruction were the most common indications for revision surgery. Surgical time was shorter with IHCC (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (±25) for ACC, and 16 months (±12) for IHCC. <b>Conclusions:</b> ACC and IHCC are similar in terms of effectiveness and safety in septorhinoplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"575-581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自体肋软骨(ACC)和辐照自体肋软骨(IHCC)常用于鼻中隔成形术,如果没有足够的鼻中隔软骨进行移植的话。目的根据感染率、吸收率、翘曲率和翻修率评估使用 ACC 或 IHCC 进行鼻中隔成形术的患者的手术效果。方法:对在一家学术机构接受 ACC 或 IHCC 鼻成形术的患者进行回顾性分析。采用费雪精确检验、卡方检验和逻辑回归分析了人口统计学数据、手术细节、抗生素使用情况以及手术时间、感染、吸收、翘曲和翻修率等结果。结果共发现 143 名患者。61名患者(42.7%)接受了ACC手术,82名患者(57.3%)接受了IHCC手术。两组的翻修率相似(ACC = 14.8%,IHCC = 14.6%;P = 0.98)。感染率没有差异(ACC = 4.9%,IHCC = 3.7%;P = 0.71)。术后畸形和鼻阻塞是最常见的翻修手术适应症。IHCC 的手术时间更短(p 结论:ACC 和 IHCC 的手术时间相似:就鼻中隔成形术的有效性和安全性而言,ACC 和 IHCC 相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Autologous Versus Irradiated Homologous Costal Cartilage Graft in Rhinoplasty.

Background: Autologous costal cartilage (ACC) and irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) are commonly used in septorhinoplasty when there is insufficient septal cartilage for grafting. Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent septorhinoplasty with either ACC or IHCC as measured by rates of infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent rhinoplasty with ACC or IHCC at a single academic institution was performed. Demographic data, surgical details, antibiotic use, and outcomes, including surgical duration, infection, resorption, warping, and revision rate, were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression. Results: One hundred forty-three patients were identified. The median age was 48 years (interquartile range: 35-57.5) and 62.2% (n = 89) were female, 61 patients (42.7%) underwent ACC, and 82 (57.3%) IHCC. Revision rate in both groups was similar (ACC = 14.8%, IHCC = 14.6%; p = 0.98). There was no difference in infection rate (ACC = 4.9%, IHCC = 3.7%; p = 0.71). Postoperative deformity and nasal obstruction were the most common indications for revision surgery. Surgical time was shorter with IHCC (p < 0.01). Mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (±25) for ACC, and 16 months (±12) for IHCC. Conclusions: ACC and IHCC are similar in terms of effectiveness and safety in septorhinoplasty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Cost Comparison of Industry Versus In-House Three-Dimensional Printed Models for Microvascular Mandible Reconstruction. Intradermal Injection of Tranexamic Acid for the Treatment of Adult Melasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Tranexamic Acid in Rhytidectomy: A Split-Face Multi-Institutional Study. Commentary on Von Sneidern et al's "Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Facial Palsy: Opportunities for Optimization at a Single Institution."-Bridging the Gap Between Guidelines and Practice. Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Facial Palsy: Opportunities for Optimization at a Single Institution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1