诊断糖尿病骨质疏松症--关于 BMD 和骨折的系统综述。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Current Osteoporosis Reports Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1
Inge Agnete Gerlach Brandt, Jakob Starup-Linde, Sally Søgaard Andersen, Rikke Viggers
{"title":"诊断糖尿病骨质疏松症--关于 BMD 和骨折的系统综述。","authors":"Inge Agnete Gerlach Brandt, Jakob Starup-Linde, Sally Søgaard Andersen, Rikke Viggers","doi":"10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Recently, the American Diabetes Association updated the 2024 guidelines for Standards of Care in Diabetes and recommend that a T-score of - 2.0 in patients with diabetes should be interpreted as equivalent to - 2.5 in people without diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the most recent findings concerning the bone mineral density (BMD)-derived T-score and risk of fractures related to osteoporosis in subjects with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is the golden standard for evaluating BMD. The BMD-derived T-score is central to fracture prediction and signifies both diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis. However, the increased fracture risk in diabetes is not sufficiently explained by the T-score, complicating the identification and management of fracture risk in these patients. Recent findings agree that subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher T-score and higher fracture risk compared with subjects without diabetes. However, the actual number of studies evaluating the direct association of higher fracture risk at higher T-score levels is scant. Some studies support the adjustment based on the 0.5 BMD T-score difference between subjects with T2D and subjects without diabetes. However, further data from longitudinal studies is warranted to validate if the T-score treatment threshold necessitates modification to prevent fractures in subjects with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48750,"journal":{"name":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Diabetes-A Systematic Review on BMD and Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Inge Agnete Gerlach Brandt, Jakob Starup-Linde, Sally Søgaard Andersen, Rikke Viggers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Recently, the American Diabetes Association updated the 2024 guidelines for Standards of Care in Diabetes and recommend that a T-score of - 2.0 in patients with diabetes should be interpreted as equivalent to - 2.5 in people without diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the most recent findings concerning the bone mineral density (BMD)-derived T-score and risk of fractures related to osteoporosis in subjects with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is the golden standard for evaluating BMD. The BMD-derived T-score is central to fracture prediction and signifies both diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis. However, the increased fracture risk in diabetes is not sufficiently explained by the T-score, complicating the identification and management of fracture risk in these patients. Recent findings agree that subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher T-score and higher fracture risk compared with subjects without diabetes. However, the actual number of studies evaluating the direct association of higher fracture risk at higher T-score levels is scant. Some studies support the adjustment based on the 0.5 BMD T-score difference between subjects with T2D and subjects without diabetes. However, further data from longitudinal studies is warranted to validate if the T-score treatment threshold necessitates modification to prevent fractures in subjects with diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Osteoporosis Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Osteoporosis Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Osteoporosis Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:最近,美国糖尿病协会更新了《2024 年糖尿病护理标准指南》,并建议糖尿病患者的 T 评分为-2.0,应解释为相当于非糖尿病患者的-2.5。我们旨在评估有关糖尿病患者骨矿密度(BMD)得出的 T 评分和骨质疏松症相关骨折风险的最新研究结果:最新研究结果:双能量 X 射线吸收测定法(DXA)扫描是评估骨密度的黄金标准。由 BMD 得出的 T 评分是骨折预测的核心,也是诊断和治疗骨质疏松症的标志。然而,T 评分并不能充分解释糖尿病患者骨折风险增加的原因,从而使这些患者骨折风险的识别和管理变得更加复杂。最近的研究结果表明,与非糖尿病患者相比,2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的 T 评分更高,骨折风险也更高。然而,评估 T 评分越高骨折风险越高的直接关联性的实际研究数量却很少。一些研究支持根据 T2D 患者与非糖尿病患者之间 0.5 的 BMD T 评分差异进行调整。不过,还需要纵向研究的进一步数据来验证是否有必要修改 T 评分治疗阈值,以预防糖尿病患者骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Diabetes-A Systematic Review on BMD and Fractures.

Purpose of review: Recently, the American Diabetes Association updated the 2024 guidelines for Standards of Care in Diabetes and recommend that a T-score of - 2.0 in patients with diabetes should be interpreted as equivalent to - 2.5 in people without diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the most recent findings concerning the bone mineral density (BMD)-derived T-score and risk of fractures related to osteoporosis in subjects with diabetes.

Recent findings: The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is the golden standard for evaluating BMD. The BMD-derived T-score is central to fracture prediction and signifies both diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis. However, the increased fracture risk in diabetes is not sufficiently explained by the T-score, complicating the identification and management of fracture risk in these patients. Recent findings agree that subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher T-score and higher fracture risk compared with subjects without diabetes. However, the actual number of studies evaluating the direct association of higher fracture risk at higher T-score levels is scant. Some studies support the adjustment based on the 0.5 BMD T-score difference between subjects with T2D and subjects without diabetes. However, further data from longitudinal studies is warranted to validate if the T-score treatment threshold necessitates modification to prevent fractures in subjects with diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Osteoporosis Reports
Current Osteoporosis Reports ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of osteoporosis. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as current and future therapeutics, epidemiology and pathophysiology, and evaluation and management. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Adiposity and Mineral Balance in Chronic Kidney Disease. Between a Rock and a Short Place-The Impact of Nephrolithiasis on Skeletal Growth and Development Across the Lifespan. Vitamin D-Do Diet Recommendations for Health Remain Strong? Correction: Bringing Mechanical Context to Image-Based Measurements of Bone Integrity. Practical Compass of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1