护士对医院产科探视限制影响的看法。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1097/NMC.0000000000001020
Stacey E Iobst, Rachel Blankstein Breman, Hannah Black, Joyce K Edmonds
{"title":"护士对医院产科探视限制影响的看法。","authors":"Stacey E Iobst, Rachel Blankstein Breman, Hannah Black, Joyce K Edmonds","doi":"10.1097/NMC.0000000000001020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore how perinatal nurses perceive the effects of visitor restrictions on patient care within a hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We distributed a cross-sectional survey online to perinatal nurses in May of 2022. Characteristics of respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Responses to an open-ended question were analyzed via conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among our sample of 101 nurses, we identified seven codes representing positive effects and seven codes representing negative effects. The most frequently reported positive effects were ability to provide person-centered care ( n = 36, 35.6%) and less patient stress and more rest ( n = 29, 28.7%). The most frequently reported negative effects were limited patient support ( n = 22, 21.8%) and emotional distress to the patient ( n = 15, 14.9%). Fourteen percent ( n = 14) of respondents cited both positive and negative effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Nurses perceived that visitor restrictions resulted in both positive and negative patient experiences. Balancing clinical needs and safety considerations with emotional needs of the childbearing individual requires careful consideration by maternity care clinicians and health care systems. Subsequent research is needed to determine optimal visitation policies during intrapartum and postpartum with consideration to hospital context and patient preferences for optimal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51121,"journal":{"name":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' Perceived Effects of Visitor Restrictions in Hospital Maternity Units.\",\"authors\":\"Stacey E Iobst, Rachel Blankstein Breman, Hannah Black, Joyce K Edmonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NMC.0000000000001020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore how perinatal nurses perceive the effects of visitor restrictions on patient care within a hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We distributed a cross-sectional survey online to perinatal nurses in May of 2022. Characteristics of respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Responses to an open-ended question were analyzed via conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among our sample of 101 nurses, we identified seven codes representing positive effects and seven codes representing negative effects. The most frequently reported positive effects were ability to provide person-centered care ( n = 36, 35.6%) and less patient stress and more rest ( n = 29, 28.7%). The most frequently reported negative effects were limited patient support ( n = 22, 21.8%) and emotional distress to the patient ( n = 15, 14.9%). Fourteen percent ( n = 14) of respondents cited both positive and negative effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Nurses perceived that visitor restrictions resulted in both positive and negative patient experiences. Balancing clinical needs and safety considerations with emotional needs of the childbearing individual requires careful consideration by maternity care clinicians and health care systems. Subsequent research is needed to determine optimal visitation policies during intrapartum and postpartum with consideration to hospital context and patient preferences for optimal care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000001020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000001020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨围产期护士如何看待探视限制对医院内病人护理的影响:我们于 2022 年 5 月在网上向围产期护士发放了一份横断面调查问卷。我们使用描述性统计对受访者的特征进行了分析。对开放式问题的回答则通过传统的内容分析法进行分析:在 101 名护士的样本中,我们确定了 7 个代表积极影响的代码和 7 个代表消极影响的代码。最常报告的积极影响是能够提供以人为本的护理(36 人,占 35.6%)以及减轻病人压力和增加休息(29 人,占 28.7%)。最常报告的负面影响是病人的支持有限(22 人,21.8%)和病人的情绪困扰(15 人,14.9%)。14%的受访者(n = 14)既提到了积极影响,也提到了消极影响:临床影响:护士们认为探视限制会给患者带来积极和消极的体验。产科护理临床医生和医疗保健系统需要仔细考虑如何在临床需求和安全考虑与育龄个体的情感需求之间取得平衡。需要进行后续研究,以确定产前和产后的最佳探视政策,同时考虑到医院环境和患者对最佳护理的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses' Perceived Effects of Visitor Restrictions in Hospital Maternity Units.

Purpose: To explore how perinatal nurses perceive the effects of visitor restrictions on patient care within a hospital setting.

Study design and methods: We distributed a cross-sectional survey online to perinatal nurses in May of 2022. Characteristics of respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Responses to an open-ended question were analyzed via conventional content analysis.

Results: Among our sample of 101 nurses, we identified seven codes representing positive effects and seven codes representing negative effects. The most frequently reported positive effects were ability to provide person-centered care ( n = 36, 35.6%) and less patient stress and more rest ( n = 29, 28.7%). The most frequently reported negative effects were limited patient support ( n = 22, 21.8%) and emotional distress to the patient ( n = 15, 14.9%). Fourteen percent ( n = 14) of respondents cited both positive and negative effects.

Clinical implications: Nurses perceived that visitor restrictions resulted in both positive and negative patient experiences. Balancing clinical needs and safety considerations with emotional needs of the childbearing individual requires careful consideration by maternity care clinicians and health care systems. Subsequent research is needed to determine optimal visitation policies during intrapartum and postpartum with consideration to hospital context and patient preferences for optimal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MCN''s mission is to provide the most timely, relevant information to nurses practicing in perinatal, neonatal, midwifery, and pediatric specialties. MCN is a peer-reviewed journal that meets its mission by publishing clinically relevant practice and research manuscripts aimed at assisting nurses toward evidence-based practice. MCN focuses on today''s major issues and high priority problems in maternal/child nursing, women''s health, and family nursing with extensive coverage of advanced practice healthcare issues relating to infants and young children. Each issue features peer-reviewed, clinically relevant articles. Coverage includes updates on disease and related care; ideas on health promotion; insights into patient and family behavior; discoveries in physiology and pathophysiology; clinical investigations; and research manuscripts that assist nurses toward evidence-based practices.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Rural Access to Prenatal Care in the United States by Patients, Nurses, Midwives, and Physicians: An Integrative Review. Concept Analysis of Woman-Centered Care: Implications for Postpartum Care. African Immigrant Women's Experiences of Maternity Care in the United States. Gastrointestinal and Gastroesophageal Reflux Scale Reference Values. Standardizing Fetal Movement Monitoring using Count the Kicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1